“marginally significant”

The center parameter for temporal tuning was also shifted more toward the signal onset in early blind individuals, which was marginally significant [ t (14) = 1.93, P = 0.074].

Pre-registered traditional ANOVAs For ERPs time-locked to inflection onset, repeated measures ANOVAs on the four quadrants revealed a marginally significant prediction-mismatch effect [ F (1,186) = 3.21, p = .074, mean difference = −.14 μV, 95% CI = (–.01, .29), Cohen's d = .168], reflecting, on average, less positive voltage for the mismatching condition than for the matching condition (match, M = .62 μV, SD = 1.17; mismatch, M = .48 μV, SD = 1.05).

Further analysis revealed that the main effect of training comes from the post-test difference between trained and untrained complex problems [ t (33.73) = 2.12, p = 0.041, d = 0.47], while the difference was marginally significant in the pre-test [ t (33.24) = 1.84, p = 0.074, d = 0.41].

In the present study, previous history of fracture was identified as an independent risk factor for females and increased 3.68-time risk of ankle fracture, and marginally significant for males (P = 0.074).

Three a-priori comparisons of these means with Shaffer control for alpha inflation revealed marginally significant differences between little and medium levels of technicality, Δ M = 0.31, σ = 0.16, t = 1.96, p = 0.074, and between little and high levels of technicality, Δ M = 0.37, σ = 0.16, t = 2.25, p = 0.074.

OT Reduced Subjective Fear Experience in Social Fear Naturalistic Contexts The ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of emotion ( F (1,65) = 1434, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.957, Figure 1 a ) such that participants rated subjective fear considerably higher during fear trials (FS and FNS) than neutral ones, and a significant main effect of social ( F (1,65) = 76.81, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.542, Figure 1a ) reflecting lower fear during social trials (FS and NS) compared with non‐social trials, and a marginally significant main effect of treatment ( F (1,65) = 3.31, p = 0.074, η p 2 = 0.048, Figure 1a ).

The overall sample also showed a significant decrease in BMD (p = 0.004), while the group with U-Cd levels of 2–4.99 μg/g creatinine showed a marginally significant decrease (p = 0.074).

110 The distribution of the four patient groups differed between responders and non-responders, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.074, Figure 6 H).

The percentage of the total effect mediated by the AgeMaxW was around 14% for the overall sample and all strata, and while the PM was not statistically significant, it was marginally significant with p = 0.074–0.075.

In children, only the oldest 11-12-year-olds exhibited a marginally significant higher d’ for the Asain-parent ( M = 1.591, SE = .124) than that in the Caucasian-parent condition ( M = 1.363, SE = .096), t (20) = 1.497, p = .074.

Spheroids from fast-relaxing gels did also trend toward increased growth, with a marginally significant p value = 0.074.

The suppression exerted by the amblyopic eye on the fellow eye (crimson bar) is indeed significantly weaker than what is observed from the nondominant eye in controls ( t [17] = 3.273, P = 0.004, Cohen's d = 1.405; independent samples t -test), and the suppression exerted on the amblyopic eye (blue bar) is much stronger than on the nondominant eye (marginally significant: t [17] = 1.906, P = 0.074, Cohen's d = 1.742; independent samples t -test).

This association remains marginally significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.074).

In that analysis, the difference between women across groups became marginally significant (Wald = 3.185, p = .074).

Subsequent analysis using a Cox regression model revealed a marginally significant association (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04-1.17, P = 0.074), indicating a 79% lower risk of extended hospitalization among patients not administered vancomycin.

In BC+CHI, we found a negative but marginally significant association between anthropization and reservoir richness (p = 0.074) ( Table 4 ).

Subsequently, a repeated-measures ANOVA with the within-subjects factor session (session 1–5) and the between-subjects factor optotype (Landolt-C versus Tumbling-E) was conducted and revealed a marginally significant main effect of session (F [3.05, 64.03] = 2.4; p = 0.074; η 2 = 0.10; Huynh-Feldt corrected), but neither a significant main effect of optotype (F [1, 21] = 0.31; p = 0.58; η 2 = 0.015) nor a significant interaction between session and optotype (F [3.05, 64.03] = 0.93; p = 0.43; η 2 = 0.04; Huynh-Feldt corrected).

In the traditional offering, this difference was significant and the median score of students who participated was 13.4 percent higher than the median score of nonparticipants (Mdn participating = 90.9, Mdn Notparticipating = 77.5, U = 396.5, p <0.0001); in the interactive offering, the difference was 4.5 percent and marginally significant (Mdn participating = 89.99, Mdn Notparticipating = 85.46, U = 184, p = 0.074).

For the parietal region, the regression model (F (16) = 2.291, p = .038) of hierarchical regression analyses revealed significant interaction effect between low-band alpha asymmetry index at P5-P6 and HF ( β = .485; p = .018), and marginally significant interactions between low-band alpha asymmetry index at P3-P4 and LF/HF ( β = -.419; p = .074) and P5-P6 and LF/HF ( β = .412; p = .072) on the BDI score for MDD patients ( Table 2 , Fig. 1 ).

The model with the Digit Span score as moderator was marginally significant ( F (3,77) = 2.40, p = 0.074, R 2 = 0.086) and the ANT and Stroop scores did not significantly moderate the relationship between age group and placebo hypoalgesia (both F < 1.45, p > 0.236).

perienced significantly (P<0.001) higher rates of collapse than trees of forms 3–7, (2) large trees with cavities within old growth stands were significantly (P = 0.009) less likely to collapse than trees within 1939-aged stands and ∼20-year old stands, and (3) trees on high productivity sites were marginally significant (P = 0.074) more likely to collapse than trees on low productivity sites ( Supplementary Information S3 ).

HIV/HCV coinfected, although marginally significant ( p = 0.074) and no significant viral load difference was detected between DAA failures and SVR patients, while untreated vs.

Furthermore, the log-rank test showed that there was a marginally significant difference in survival ( P = 0.074) among the four clusters, indicating the survival relevance of the sPA scores.

A marginally significant CO and HE interaction was found for the last of the three intervals (433–500 ms; F(1, 7) = 4.408; p = 0.074).

A linear mixed-effects model with SCS scores as the dependent variable revealed a marginally significant Group × Time interaction effect via Type III Wald F tests ( F = 2.66, p = 0.074) (see Table 3 ).