Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP- value = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Association between spatial distance of the parents, coancestry, and DBH with the number of generated seeds The correlation between the distance of pollen donors with the number of seeds was marginally significant ( r = −0.253, P- value = 0.073), suggesting a greater tendency toward mating between spatially proximal trees than distant ones.
marginally significantP = 0.0731.5× alphagold
The total net effect of water addition on the bacterial community was marginally significant [standardized coefficient = 0.28, Z value (dividing the regression weight estimate by its standard error) = 1.79, P = 0.073], whereas that of nitrogen addition was non-significant (standardized coefficient = 0.11, Z value = 1.35, P = 0.176).
marginally significantp = 0.0731.5× alphagold
While there was no difference between the noise-normalized pattern correlation and 1 for the near voxels ( t (9) = 1.942, p = 0.958, d = 0.614; corrected), the difference was marginally significant for the far voxels ( t (9) = 2.029, p = 0.073, d = 0.642; corrected), with a significant difference between the near and far voxels ( t (9) = 2.52, p = 0.033, d = 1.06).
marginally significantp = 0.073651.5× alphagold
Following Long ( 2012 ), we then interpreted the chosen model by looking at the coefficients together with visually inspecting the plot of the fitted model. As shown in the table, the simplest model that provided a marginally significant better fit of the data than simpler models was the cubic model, χ 2 (7) = 12.9371 , p = 0.07365.
Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance.
Cogn Res Princ Implic · 2022 · PMC8817015
marginally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
OT Reduced Subjective Fear Experience in Social Fear Naturalistic Contexts The ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of emotion ( F (1,65) = 1434, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.957, Figure 1 a ) such that participants rated subjective fear considerably higher during fear trials (FS and FNS) than neutral ones, and a significant main effect of social ( F (1,65) = 76.81, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.542, Figure 1a ) reflecting lower fear during social trials (FS and NS) compared with non‐social trials, and a marginally significant main effect of treatment ( F (1,65) = 3.31, p = 0.074, η p 2 = 0.048, Figure 1a ).
marginally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
However, Tukey’s post hoc tests revealed no differences between specific education levels, except for a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.074) in the ranking of Idea 8 ( popular people ) between secondary education (HAVO, n = 23, M = 5.74) and university students ( n = 167, M = 4.40). 4.