“marginally significant”

sad: p = .009), and the sad over neutral comparison remains marginally significant after the Bonferroni post-hoc correction (p = .071).

The alpha-diversity (Shannon and Chao1 indexes) was evaluated for each group at each timepoint, and only the Chao1 index showed a marginally significant difference when CRC1 and CRC2 rats were compared ( p = 0.071) ( Figure 7 A).

Although the number of saccades was numerically smaller for spaced sentences (mean: 17.74 saccades for spaced, and 18.11 for unspaced), regression analysis revealed only a marginally significant difference (β = −0.447, SE = 0.247, p = 0.071).

In the same model, the prior suspension × condition interaction was somewhat reduced and became marginally significant, b = 0.042, P = 0.071 (table S26).

The results showed a marginally significant main effect of emotion on LPP amplitude [ F (2, 122) = 2.806, p = 0.071, η 2 p = 0.044], with fearful emotion ( M = 8.884, SD = 0.805) eliciting greater LPP amplitudes than happy emotion ( M = 7.177, SD = 0.953).

While the interaction between SRPE and test delay had no significant effect on recognition certainty, χ 2 (1, N = 37) = 0.039, p = 0.84, there was an interaction between SRPEs and recognition accuracy, χ 2 (1, N = 37) = 4.56, p = 0.033, and a marginally significant three-way interaction between SRPE, recognition accuracy and test delay, χ 2 (1, N = 37) = 3.25, p = 0.071.

γ-H2AX expression in TS-overexpressing human tumors was marginally significant as compared with that in TS-negative tumors ( P = 0.071; Figure 8E ).

In contrast, little out-group distrust was observed for either ethnic group in the southern part of Xinjiang (Korla), except that the d’ in differentiating between out-group faces+distrust words and out-group faces+trust words was marginally significant for the Uyghur, F (1, 428) = 3.28, p = .071.

Elytra measurements revealed marginally significant differences among populations ( F 3,96 = 2.42, P = 0.071; Table 1 ).

For 6-minute trial blocks, we found a marginally significant correlation between RESS_rivalry and self-report, r (11) = 0.52, P = .071, B \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{doc

However, the interaction between the main factors was marginally significant ( Wald x 2 2 = 5.301, P = 0.071).

Furthermore, within the trauma-exposed group, higher prefrontal GABA levels retained a marginally significant association with reduced CBF levels after excluding four potential outliers (β = −0.240, P = 0.071).

On the other hand, the association of the CTNNB1 mutation with superficial (< 1/2) MI was marginally significant ( P = 0.071).

Analyses of the full data set indicated a marginally significant association of the APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism with cancer risk under allelic (odds ratio (OR)=1.05; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.99-1.11; P=0.071), dominant (OR=1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; P=0.028), and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16; P=0.026) models, with significant heterogeneity and publication bias.

When analyses were repeated using Spearman rho correlation, four associations remained significant (see Table 2 ), including the associations between Proximity and OXTR binding in the total presubiculum (ρ = − 0.83, p = 0.01), Contact and OXTR binding in the total presubiculum (ρ = − 0.83, p = 0.01), Proximity and OXTR binding in PSB3 (ρ = − 0.88, p = 0.004), and Contact and OXTR binding density in PSB3 (ρ = − 0.88, p = 0.004); the associations between OXTR binding in PSB1 and Proximity and Contact were marginally significant ( p = 0.071; see Table 2 ).

Adding the CBCL peer relations scale to the CBCL Total problem scale regression model led to a decrease in β from 1.75 to 0.97, remaining marginally significant ( β = 0.97, p = 0.071, CI − 0.08 to 2.01, R 2 = 0.30), indicating that CBCL total problem T scores are influenced by the peer relations scale, but remain higher in older presenters compared to younger presenters.

There were marginally significant results for number of vegetable serves (p = 0.071) and of vigorous PA sessions (p = 0.065), both demonstrating an incremental effect as the number increased.

This trend is also reflected in a marginally significant difference in a t -test between the mean liking ratings in the high ( M = 3.80, SD = 0.89) and low feedback condition ( M = 3.70, SD = 0.92, p = 0.071, see right side of Figure 3 ).

Further correlation analysis showed that there was a marginally significant negative correlation between Ruminococcaceae UCG-013 and Bacteroides (Spearman, R = − 0.2, p = 0.071).

Couples who described their relationship with their children at baseline in less negative terms, showed a marginally significant benefit from participating in the TRUE Dads groups ( t = 1.38; p = 0.071), while those entering the study with highly negative relationships with their child significantly improved this relationship if they were in the intervention condition ( t = −3.041; p = 0.023).

These trends were marginally significant with respect to Mrp8 expression in liver (FC = 4.13, P = 0.071), Mrp8 expression in ear skin (FC = 3.32, P = 0.036), Mrp14 expression in liver (FC = 3.64, P = 0.057) and Mrp14 expression in ear skin (FC = 2.15, P = 0.064) (one-tail two-sample t -test).

Mouth breathing showed a marginally significant association that attenuated after full adjustment (P = 0.071).

The MANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Drawing on Linear Overgeneralizations [ F (2,197) = 1.970, p = 0.071; η p 2 = 0.020].

In contrast, the high PCL-R group exhibited a marginally significant negative correlation between Major Drug Use and DRUG > FOOD reactivity within the right insula r = -0.38, p = 0.071 and left caudate nucleus, r = -0.37, p = 0.077.

Poor oral hygiene showed a marginally significant association in both models (univariate OR = 1.79, p = 0.071; multivariate OR = 1.85, p = 0.060) ( Table 6 ). 4.