“marginally significant”

Multiple regression analysis identified BMI as an independent predictor of composite brain SUVR (β = -0.0168, p = 0.0046), while SUVR SG was marginally significant (β = -0.0714, p = 0.0701).

This aligns well with the presence of a marginally significant negative correlation in the prey group between score gains and the occurrence of dreams related to the participant’s personal life ( p = 0.0702).

Winter colony loss rates was significantly inverse related to colony loss rate in the following autumn in Germany ( r 2 = 0.463, F 1,8 = 6.034, p = 0.044) and Regions ( r 2 = 0.236, F 1,33 = 9.914, p = 0.004)), with a similar trend but marginally significant in RP ( r 2 = 0.351, F 1,8 = 4.531, p = 0.071) ( Figure 2 ).

The condition-by-ROI interaction was marginally significant ( F (2,74) = 2.74, p = 0.071, η p 2 = 0.07), reaching significance when only right-handed participants were included (see Supplementary Materials ).

In the group of learners we observed a significant positivity from 330 to 386 ms (cluster mass permutation test, p < .01) and a marginally significant negativity from 416 to 450 ms (cluster mass permutation test, p = .071) in the left fronto-central region after Rule deviants.

The type of ART was marginally significant (P=0.071) and the maturation rate was not significant (P=0.786).

As a result, the protective effect of AICs against overall infection was significant in model 1 (HR 0.18; CI 95% 0.04-0.87; p = 0.016) and marginally significant in model 2 (HR 0.25; CI 95% 0.05-1.29; p = 0.071).

The rmANOVA of the frequency values showed a marginally significant effect of the interaction of group and hand [ F (4, 15) = 2.694, p = 0.071, η 2 = 0.418; Table 3 ].

In contrast, little out-group distrust was observed for either ethnic group in the southern part of Xinjiang (Korla), except that the d’ in differentiating between out-group faces+distrust words and out-group faces+trust words was marginally significant for the Uyghur, F (1, 428) = 3.28, p = .071.

Although the bivariate correlation between “need for more” and log‐transformed calories consumed was marginally significant ( r = .19, p = .071), “need for more” and “making trade‐offs” did not relate to log‐transformed calorie consumption in the full regression model, β = 0.18, t (90) = 1.47, p = .14, and β = −0.02, t (90) = −0.51, p = .61, respectively.

The main effect of feedback was marginally significant, with increased switching observed after the absence of reward compared to receiving a reward (23.1% and 21.3%), F (1, 51) = 3.39, p = 0.071, η p 2 = 0.06.

In the same model, the prior suspension × condition interaction was somewhat reduced and became marginally significant, b = 0.042, P = 0.071 (table S26).

The alpha-diversity (Shannon and Chao1 indexes) was evaluated for each group at each timepoint, and only the Chao1 index showed a marginally significant difference when CRC1 and CRC2 rats were compared ( p = 0.071) ( Figure 7 A).

These trends were marginally significant with respect to Mrp8 expression in liver (FC = 4.13, P = 0.071), Mrp8 expression in ear skin (FC = 3.32, P = 0.036), Mrp14 expression in liver (FC = 3.64, P = 0.057) and Mrp14 expression in ear skin (FC = 2.15, P = 0.064) (one-tail two-sample t -test).

Changes (post‐pre) in scores for all clinical and psychological variables were statistically significant ( P < .05) except DSST, which showed a marginally significant increase ( P = .071). 3.2.

Notably, within the high-efficacy group (SE > 44), self-efficacy itself showed a marginally significant negative association with job satisfaction ( β = −0.542, p = 0.071), suggesting a potential saturation effect or complex interplay where very high efficacy, in the absence of sufficient passion or other factors, might not further enhance satisfaction and could even be associated with different dynamics (e.g., heightened sensitivity to unmet expectations).

There was a marginally significant difference between the family and friend conditions ( p = .071).

sad: p = .009), and the sad over neutral comparison remains marginally significant after the Bonferroni post-hoc correction (p = .071).

A marginally significant improvement (quadratic, P = 0.071) in G:F was observed as SID Lys increased.

Mouth breathing showed a marginally significant association that attenuated after full adjustment (P = 0.071).

The two main effects were also non-significant for the motor RDM ( p > 0.5 for both) but their interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.071).

This difference is marginally significant ( p = 0.071 for ER + PR + and p = 0.054 for ER - PR - cancer).

The number of retrieved lymph nodes and tumor differentiation were marginally significant between the two groups (P=0.071 and 0.053, respectively).

When COVID-19 stress scores were entered into the model, the gene x collection time interaction was marginally significant (p=0.071), with youth with higher stress scores reporting higher externalizing behaviors regardless of their genotype.

Although the time × group × context interaction was marginally significant ( p = .071, see Table 3 ), the second and third columns in Fig. 5 depict the change in mu attenuation for social and nonsocial conditions for computer-generated and live action environments, respectively.