A marginally significant negative relationship was also found for natural killer (NK) cells, with alcohol lowering their frequency by 6.2% (OR 0.9377, p = 0.0359).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
When we analyzed the species independently, only Saponaria pumila (Caryophyllaceae) and Androsace vitaliana (Primulaceae) showed significant and marginally significant associations between heterozygosity and pcurv ( p ‐value = 0.036, r 2 = 0.126 and p ‐value = 0.086, r 2 = 0.093, respectively).
The main effect of group was not significant, but planned comparisons indicated a difference between non-musicians and a combination of novices and experts that was marginally significant at an adjusted alpha of.03, F (1, 31) = 3.25, p = .036.
Developmental stage was also marginally significant ( P = 0.036) for moult communities, with a significant interaction between trawl and sex ( P < 0.01).
The Woodcock and MLU quantitative measures showed marginally significant p-values for replication in the 112–114 cM region ( p = 0.036 and 0.045, respectively).
Floral epidermal cells of selfers are approximately 35% smaller in surface area than epidermal cells in related outcrossers, a difference that is marginally significant ( P = 0.036, n = 6 species pairs; Table S1 ).
There was no evidence of a difference between the group means but there was a marginally significant difference between the means at 2 h ( p = 0.036) and at 3 h ( p = 0.041) when each was compared to the baseline mean.
After adjustments for age, prepregnancy BMI, occupation, conception method, conception season, family history of diabetes, gravidity and parity in model 2, the association weakened to marginally significant (a OR = 0.656, 95% CI : 0.443–0.973, p = 0.036).
In this population, a marginally significant association of rs2014408 with HT was observed (over-dominant, OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48–0.98, p = 0.036, Table 4 ).
In the Hong Kong cohort, it showed a marginally significant association (P = 0.036, OR = 1.31; after adjustment, P = 0.042, OR = 1.32).
The two models were compared using likelihood ratio test and observed that the additional value of SAECG and HRV on EF<40% is marginally significant (P=0.036).
Results: Reverse MR analysis indicated a causal relationship where depression leads to an increase in overall WBC count (IVW beta = 0.031, p = 0.015, p FDR = 0.044) and specifically in basophil count (IVW beta = 0.038, p = 0.006, p FDR = 0.038), with a marginally significant impact on lymphocyte count (beta = 0.029, p = 0.036, p FDR = 0.071).
Follow-up ANOVAs, conducted in each sex and each social context separately, revealed a significant effect of time delay on male average bout duration in courtship interactions, F 4, 32 = 5.01, P = 0.003, but no effect in females or in any rivalry interactions; t -tests on the male courtship data revealed a marginally significant increase between Live and 3 s, t 8 = −2.51, P = 0.036, in male average bout duration ( Figure 8 ).
Notably, the condition of depression in pregnancy also appeared to be related to a higher risk of pre-eclampsia, albeit in a marginally significant way: OR 1.36, p = 0.036, CI 1.02-1.82.
For parent data, there was one difference, with the marginally significant hyperactivity finding becoming significant (p = 0.036).
M1-M2 “C-C” haplotype was absent in the probands and stratified analysis showed a marginally significant difference for the male individuals (χ 2 = 4.37, P = 0.036) as opposed to male controls.
While we are underpowered to detect any true correlations between recombination rate and parental age, we did find a marginally significant association between NCO rate and paternal age ( P = .036; raw data in s upplementary table S3 , Supplementary material online).
Frequency distribution of bi-allelic mean in two categories (extreme and moderate alleles) showed over-representation of extreme sized alleles in the cases with marginally significant value (50.3% vs. 61.5%, χ 2 = 4.41; P = 0.036), which turned insignificant upon applying Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
HRV ratio As with SDNN, multilevel analysis revealed a marginally significant decrease in HRV ratio during the incubation ( β i n c u b a t i o n = −0.01, SE=0.01; p=0.0361) and presymptomatic periods ( β p r e - s y m p t o m a t i c = −0.02, SE = −0.01; p=0.0165) compared with baseline ( β i n t e r c e p t = 0.50, SE=0.02; p<0.0001).
There was a marginally significant overall effect of lockdown on NPI scores ( p = 0.0367, adjusted p = 0.064).
In LCL control nuclei the average super-cluster diameter was 0.62 (±0.22) μm, with only the difference between control and minipig 201 being marginally significant ( p = 0.037).
There were marginally significant correlations between Repetitive Behavior Scale—Revised (RBS-R) scores and the number of nights recorded with Dreem or Empatica ( r (102) < −0.21, P < 0.037, not significant after Bonferroni’s correction), but not with Withings ( r (102) > −0.1, P = 0.3).
However, its predictive power declined in the full models, though it remained marginally significant in Model 5 ( p = 0.037).
Relative to the right radial access, a marginally significant increase in catheter numbers was observed in the left radial access in studies with diagnostic coronary procedure only (WMD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.63; P = 0.037), with strong evidence of heterogeneity (P<0.0005).
Similarly, for Monkey B, duration (coefficient estimate = − 0.214, standard error = 0.219, t = − 0.976, p = 0.350) did not significantly predict slope, though velocity showed a marginally significant effect (coefficient estimate = − 0.005, standard error = 0.002, t = − 2.370, p = 0.037).