“marginally significant”

Differences in number of individuals in center between the first control and the experimental trial were significantly related to migratory strategy (95% confidence intervals: −189.31; −97.18, p<0.0001) and marginally significant for diet breadth (−6.85; 0.43, p = 0.035).

Another cluster of the left motor cortex, including the precentral gyrus, the postcentral gyrus, and the posterior division of the middle frontal gyrus, showed a marginally significant correlation with CMAPs in the orbicularis oculi at the Post-V1 period (r = 0.499, p = 0.035) and a marginal prediction effect on oculi CMAPs at the Post-V1 period by pre-neurorrhaphy activation (r = 0.473, p = 0.047).

Additionally, our results showed that CBI with gender was marginally significant (β = 0.118, P = 0.035).

Furthermore, there was now a marginally significant effect in the TB1 condition that was previously not significant in either study ( M = 0.173, 95%CI = [0.012; 0.333]), t 49 = 2.165, p = 0.035.

A test for linear trend was marginally significant ( P = 0.035), and there was no evidence of a nonlinear relation DISCUSSION We have confirmed the increased risk of death after bereavement and demonstrated its independence of pre-existing physician-recorded chronic comorbid conditions and social status.

Supertype ST12 had a marginally significant effect on parasite intensity on these ornamental fish ( z 1421 = −2.11, p = .035; Figure S4 ).

Of note, when we ran another model in which disease duration (marginally significant in the univariate analysis) was included, results did not change [for HLA-B-27; OR (95% CI) = 4.14 (1.11–15.43), p = 0.035; and for peripheral arthritis OR (95% CI) = 3.05 (1.10–8.42), p = 0.031].

We observed a slight decrease in both aerial and root dry weight in 1RW relative to 1RS (average 7.2% and 8.0%, respectively), which was marginally significant in one of the experiments ( P = 0.035 and P = 0.036, respectively) but not in the combined analyses (Table 1 ).

Marginally significant correlations during the SAT condition were observed at Optodes 3 and 5 for [HbO] with the PANSS positive subscale (rho = 0.45~0.484, p = 0.035~0.04) but not for other subscales.

Only a marginally significant difference was found between these two distributions using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test ( P = 0.035) (Figure 1a ).

The strength in the p-value was largely due to zero abundances; upon exclusion of zeros, the difference in richness was marginally significant (p-value = 0.035).

Prediction for ABO status in all individuals was marginally significant when compared to permuted data ( P = 0.035); however, accuracy was low (median accuracy = 46%).

Correlations of personality traits with conversion risk in iRBD patients In the unadjusted Cox regression model, openness was a marginally significant predictor of conversion (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.98; p = 0.035; P adjusted = 0.12; post hoc power = 0.54).

For age acceleration metrics, significant differences were observed in PhenoAge ( P < 0.001), GrimAge ( P < 0.001), and HannumAge ( P < 0.001), while HorvathAge showed a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.035).

Mask wear resulted in marginally significant higher corneal staining of left eye samples (0.4±0.6 vs. 0.2±0.4, mask vs. no-mask wear, respectively, P =0.035), but otherwise there was no statistical support for differences between mask and no-mask wear for dry eye and CL symptoms with the OSDI and CLDEQ-8 questionnaires, respectively, or for conjunctival staining in both eyes (Table 1 ).

Intriguingly, Poisson regression of the count of paternal mutations on both parental ages revealed a marginally significant effect of maternal age ( P = 0.035) and a slight but nonsignificant improvement in the fit compared with a model with paternal age only (∆AIC = −2.4; SI Appendix , Table S8 ).

The analysis revealed a significant main effect of procedure ( F (1, 12) = 11.36, p = .006, partial η 2 = .486), as well as a marginally significant three-way interaction between stimulation mode, procedure and electrode number ( F (4.8, 57.3) = 2.63, p = .035, partial η 2 = .179).

The MIMOP program successfully identified three out of the four test cases, albeit with a marginally significant prediction for the 1N8Z dataset ( P -value = 0.035).

Moreover, correlations between this factor and behavioral task results (Semantic Definition accuracy and General Success) stayed fully or marginally significant even after FDR corrections (adjusted p = 0.035 and 0.068, respectively).

For the binary data of “college or university degree” versus other six categories, the bivariate GREML indicated a marginally significant heterogeneity between POP1 and POP2 ( p -value = 0.035) and no significant signal between POP2 and POP3 ( p -value = 0.494), and POP1 and POP3 ( p -value = 0.94).

the child’s CDC BMI percentile with an OR 1.073 (95% CI 1.046–1.101; p<0.001) per percentile point, and though marginally significant, the child’s age with an OR of 1.117 (95% CI 1.006–1.241; p = 0.035) per year of age and maternal education with an OR (per additional level).

The observed gains are much closer to those predicted by the power-law model, although the difference between the model and observations was marginally significant ( p = 0.035) over the entire 40 000–60 000-generation interval ( table 2 ).

The effect of layer was marginally significant for δ 15 N values (ANOVA: F = 6.760, p = 0.035) but not for δ 13 C values ( F = 4.48, p = 0.07).

Left rotation in Group A was marginally significant (p = 0.035), whereas Group B exhibited an extremely significant gain (p < 0.0001).

The PD-UNC group showed marginally significant higher GM volume than the HC group (mean difference = -0.23, p = 0.035, post-hoc Bonferroni).