“marginally significant”

We built the aforementioned models stratified by gender based on the marginally significant interaction between gender and weight perception pattern in our sample (p = 0.07), and further performed subgroup analysis across BMI category (normal and obese).

There was also a marginally significant negative change in left amygdala–vACC connectivity for Anger > Neutral in the HCs alone ( P = 0.07, svc; see Figure 3B ), but not in the CD subgroups considered separately.

We found that unretired older adults’ negative attitudes toward older population in personality and mental health predicted a lower likelihood of post-retirement employment planning at a marginally significant level (p = .07), even after controlling socioeconomic status.

Regarding the lockdown sample, the ART ANOVAs revealed significant time×group interaction effects on VO 2peak ( F 1,13 =11.44; P =.01; η 2 =0.47) and a marginally significant interaction effect on depression ( F 1,13 =3.90; P =.07; η 2 =0.23).

Regarding statistical analysis, the only interaction terms that came out marginally significant when fitting the full model was between the group and the iontophoretic dose ( p = 0.07, below the predefined level of 0.1, see Methods).

Head shape was also significantly related to trophic level (δ 15 N) (correlation coefficient = .37; permutation test, p ≤ .01) among morphs but had only a marginally significant first singular axis (SA) (Eigenvalues coefficient = .017; permutation test, p = .07).

The post hoc t test revealed a marginally significant difference between agency and narrative [mean agency score = 0.20; mean narrative score = –0.06, t (80) = 2.20, P = .07, Cohen's d = 0.24 , 1 – ß = 0.17].

At the northern extent, 20 species showed a northward shift, marginally significant at p = 0.07.

Reductions in the correlation between left SFG and right LOC in Patient 2 ( p < 0.05), and right ( p < 0.01) and left (marginally significant: p = 0.07) SMG, and right LOC (marginally significant: p = 0.07) in Patient 3, and were also found.

Manifest anxiety showed a marginally significant influence ( P = .070), but multiple comparison analysis showed no significant differences for T0 to T1 ( P = .128), T0 to T2 ( P = .150), and T1 to T2 ( P = .985) (Table 2 ).

The exception is the temporariness subscale, which only showed a marginally significant association with the EPDS for men ( p =0.07).

At an above-average income, fWHR was a marginally significant predictor of Machiavellianism, β = −.36, p = .07. fWHR was not a significant predictor of narcissism, β = .04, p = .71.

There was a marginally significant effect of the prevention focus on the level of goal [ F (1,111) = 3.5 , p = 0.07] such that high-prevention respondents were setting directionally lower goal levels compared to the low-prevention respondents.

Crucially, the main effect for PMEA level, while not significant at the α = 0.05 threshold, was found to be marginally significant, [ F (1,116) = 3.305, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03].

There were significant main effects of cultural group ( F [1, 83] = 5.84, p = 0.02; Cohen’s d = 0.51) and ABMT condition ( F [1, 83] = 4.98, p = 0.03; Cohen’s d = 0.47), but these main effects were qualified by their interaction that was marginally significant: ( F [1, 83] = 3.39, p = 0.07; Cohen’s d = 0.39).

When qPCR results were compared to temperatures of collection dates, the temperature 60 days prior to collection date was marginally significant (p = 0.07), and temperature 15 and 30 days prior to the collection date were not significant.

In the logistic regression model, individuals in the PmPPF group were more likely to have a UIP pattern compared to the non‐PmPPF group, and this effect was marginally significant (odds ratio [OR] = 4.44, P = 0.07) but was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for age and sex (OR = 3.39, P = 0.17).

The increase in step length for the normal leg was marginally significant ( p = 0.070).

Next, when the clinical features of the 84 ESCC cases were stratified by the pathohistological response of the primary lesion to NAC, the distribution of pathological T stage was significantly different between responders and non-responders ( P < 0.0001) whereas the distribution of pathological stage and pretreatment serum CEA value were marginally significant ( P = 0.07, Table 2 ).

Correlations between the three speech measures and tinnitus awareness and tinnitus impact were not significant at the alpha < 0.05 level (two-tailed distribution), although a marginally significant positive correlation was seen between BKB sentence testing in quiet scores and tinnitus awareness ( r = 0.185, p = 0.07).

There was a marginally significant difference in initial sputum culture positivity between the two groups ( P = 0.07), with DM+ being more likely to present with a positive sputum culture.

In the multivariate model, gender was marginally significant, with women less likely to report transactional sex than men (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04–1.14, p = 0.07).

As we predicted, language extremity had a marginally significant effect on discount rate (F(2, 125) = 2.761, p = 0.07, η p 2 = .042).

The main effect of time for reduction in glucose AUC was marginally significant from pre to post 10 kg of weight loss ( P = 0.07).

There was no significant interaction of elevated FLI with age ( p = 0.11) and there was a marginally significant interaction with sex ( p = 0.07).