“marginally significant”

The difference between the MMN for the GP and PP groups was marginally significant at the central location (t(13) = 1.87, p = 0.07, GP = -0.82μV, PP = -0.13μV), and not significant at the supratemporal location.

For ∂ 15 N and sex, maturity stage and location a marginally significant relationship was found (∂ 15 N: p = 0.07, r 2 = 0.31, F 10,43 = 1.92) attributed to the fact that male individuals of S . pteropus do not grow as large as females and therefore occupy lower size classes with lower ∂ 15 N values ( Fig 5A ).

Additionally, boys had an earlier acrophase on A during the school days, but this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

Crucially, this analysis revealed that, overall, the stress group showed marginally greater learning of probability-based information than the control group (as indicated by the marginally significant GROUP × PROBABILITY interaction, F (1, 51) = 3.45, p = .07, η 2 p = .06; stress group: M random high = 96.34%, M random low = 101.61%, standardized learning score: M = 5.27%; control group: M random high = 97.04%, M random low = 100.89%, standardized learning score: M = 3.85%, see Fig 4 ; for a figure with individual data points, see S5 Fig in S1 File ).

There was a marginally significant positive interaction term between time and intervention (adjusted GEE, P = .07), suggesting that the PI was more effective than the PSI in increasing mammogram screening among Latinas ( Figure 2 ).

Marginally significant improvement in sensitivity of zone diagnosis using colored images with FA (61.1%) compared to colored images alone (47%) ( P = 0.07) was noted.

Besides replicating the non-significant effect of movement order already observed in the former ANOVA, this analysis indicated a significant main effect of target distance (F (1,28) = 7.03, p = 0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.5) and a marginally significant distance by eccentricity interaction (F (1,28) = 3.4, p = 0.07; LSD post-hoc comparisons: FP < NP, FC and NC, all p < 0.05).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between Group and Sex, F (4, 699) = 2.11, p = 0.07.

For the biology and fruits categories, the results were marginally significant, t (126) = 1.86 , p = .07 and t (127) = 1.86, p = .07 respectively, with NUS students producing slightly more words than NUS High students.

A marginally significant main effect of button function was found [ F (1,80) = 3.38, p = 0.070, η p 2 = 0.04], together with a significant interaction effect of age group and button function [ F (2,80) = 3.51, p = 0.035, η p 2 = 0.08].

Probing the presence of Style differences in Mandarin and English perceivers as a function of Tone, one marginally significant comparison was observed: T3 perceived by English participants ( p = 0.07; p -values >0.25 in other comparisons); their identification of Clear T3 (58.4%, SD = 0.53) was higher than Plain T3 (48.2%, SD = 0.53).

Results: For the number of words recalled across each of the 6 lists, there was a significant main effect for list (P<0.001, η 2 p =0.15), marginally significant main effect for group (P=0.07, η 2 p =0.09), but no list by group interaction effect (P=0.44, η 2 p =0.03).

There was a significant interaction between time × quality of memory ( F (2,653) = 14.324, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.021) and a marginally significant interaction between quality of memory × genotype ( F (1,653) = 2.673, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.008).

LUACR, in the logistic regression analysis, was marginally significant ( P =0.07) but was not included in the final model (Figure 2 ).

Behrmann, Avidan [ 22 ] reported a marginally significant correlation ( r = .84, p = .07) between face discrimination performance and a global/local index derived from the Navon paradigm [(Local-Global Inconsistent trials)–(Local-Global Consistent trials)] in a small group of individuals ( N = 5): The greater the local bias, the poorer the performance in the face discrimination task.

At TL2 we found marginally significant reduced power in the alpha band for LATE versus EARLY questions between about 600 to 900 ms after the onset of the last word (p = .07).

When multiple comparisons were accounted for, only the CYP17A1 rs17724534 variant remained marginally significant (OR per copy of the risk allele (A) = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.08-1.78, corrected p-value = 0.07).

Response latencies in Range 3 were faster than in Range 4, although this effect was marginally significant [ F (1,7) = 4.72, MSE = 0.02,4, p < 0.07].

Moreover, the difference between the two groups in delta 1 was marginally significant but in the expected direction, with delta 1 being larger in the Training-first group than in the Waiting-first group ( p < 0.07; Cohen’s d = 0.49).

After controlling for hormone receptor (HR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and having received trimodality treatment, the association between Ki-67 status and overall survival remained marginally significant (p=0.07).

Likewise, adding relative risk to a model with only absolute risk improved fit significantly (p<.001), whereas adding absolute risk to a model including relative risk was associated with only a marginally significant improvement in fit (p=.07).

The decrease in total Hg in the brain over time was marginally significant ( p < 0.07), with an apparent T 1/2 of 59.5 ± 24.1 days.

The performance on training trials was very similar between the two groups (t(18) = 1.51, p = 0.15), however the difference in performance on test trials was marginally significant (t(18) = 1.87, p = 0.07).

A marginally significant ( p = 0.07) inverse relationship between the number of children and mean hair THg concentration was found with the highest levels in women who had not had children previously.

However, the squared term for employer event communication demonstrated a marginally significant and positive relationship with salesperson resilience (B = 0.19, p = .07), which indicates a weak curvilinear relationship between employer event communication and salesperson resilience.