On the other hand, reduced risk of death was seen in patients with any reduction in tumor AEF (decrease ratio ≥ 0) and with increased AEF but not exceeding the ratio of 0.102 (increase ratio < 0.102) (HR = 0.32, p < 0.001), though the protective effect was marginally significant in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.61, p = 0.068).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
mediator) between-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the proportion correctly recalled targets on the final test yielded a small, marginally significant main effect of learning condition, F (1,83) = 3.416, p = .068, η 2 p = .040.
A marginally significant main effect of time was found for the interval subtest [ F (2,16) = 3.19, p = 0.068].
The interaction effect between electrodes and condition was marginally significant (χ 2 (2) = 4.783, p = 0.068), and the post hoc comparison suggested that the ERP responses evoked by aspect violation sentences were larger than those evoked by correct sentences at PZ (β = 2.038, SE = 1.227, z = 2.362, p = 0.017).
The results revealed a marginally significant main effect of typicality ( F (1, 76) = 3.44, p = 0.068), a significant main effect of AoA ( F (1, 76) = 24.43 p < 0.0001), but no reliable effect of frequency ( F (1, 76) = 0.74, p = 0.392).
The marginally significant difference between the conditions in the time taken ( t (210) = 1.84, p = .068, d = 0.13, BF 01 = 3.46) was in the opposite direction—participants spent marginally more time writing about the feminist topic in the repeat condition than in the switch condition ( M repeat = 232.29 s, M switch = 204.12 s, M Diff = 28.17 s, SE = 15.35 s).
Multiple testing of the mean angle in the supralateral sector, which was statistically significant, between PSD, fellow, and controls showed a significant difference between fellow and control and a marginally significant difference between PSD and controls (PSD vs. control; P = 0.068, PSD vs. fellow; P = 0.652, fellow vs. control; P = 0.011, Steel-Dwass test).
As shown in Table 2 , there is no association between nuclear YAP1 expression and tumor grade or residual disease in regional lymph nodes, but there exists a marginally significant correlation (r = 0.33 and p-value = 0.068 in the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis) between nuclear YAP1 level and tumor stage.
In public validation sets for samples with PFS information ( n =91), the Class-1 membership was associated with better prognosis in univariate analysis ( P =1.4 × 10 −3 ), shown as Figure 2 , and still marginally significant association with multivariate analysis ( P =6.8 × 10 −2 , n =57).
Moreover, differences in richness of typical grassland species among treatment were recorded, even if marginally significant (F = 5.69, p = 0.068).
Obesity significantly associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP, p =0.005) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, p =0.002), larger cardiac volumes (end-diastolic volume, EDV, p =0.013; end-systolic volume, ESV, p =0.040), and a marginally significant influence on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, p =0.068).
Biogeographic patterns of ant genomes After controlling for both spatial autocorrelation and potential phylogenetic patterns, we found a marginally significant, positive correlation between ant assembly size similarity and climate similarity (Mantel R = 0.12, p -value = 0.068).
zebrina showed a marginally significant difference between genetic groups at 20°C, with genetic group one displaying a lower metabolic rate than group 2 ( p = 0.068) (Figure 4 , bottom panels). 3.5.
This trend was consistent among species (slopes = −0.107 to −0.015), although the interaction between latitude and species was marginally significant (λ F 2,48 = 2.85, P = 0.068; λ s : F 2,12 = 3.10, P = 0.082).
Moreover, the differences of ERPs elicited by “NAL” and “NA” prosodies were marginally significant over left hemisphere ( p = .068).
4 A) of benthic macroinvertebrates, while the differences in δ 13 C values among species were marginally significant (p = 0.068, Kruskal–Wallis test, n = 60, Fig. 4 B).
The multivariate main effect of Time was marginally significant [Pillai’s V = 0.064, F (2, 81) = 2.78, p = 0.068, ηp 2 = 0.064], while the Time * Group interaction did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.628).
However, the path from reading ability to MT6 was marginally significant (β = 0.09, p = 0.068), and the path from visual–spatial ability to CT6 (β = –0.05, p = 0.680), and MT6 (β = –0.02, p = 0.853) was not significant.
However, several fatty acids showed marginally significant differences between subjects with and without depressive symptoms, including EPA ( P =0·068), n -3 PUFA ( P =0·072) and n -3 LCPUFA ( P =0·078).
The variable Daily using is non-significant in the GDP model ( β = 0.2102, p = 0.153) but becomes much stronger and marginally significant in the GNI model ( β = 0.4144, p = 0.068).
Differences in IES-R score between the UC and LP groups were marginally significant from baseline to 12 months ( p = 0.068).
While no statistically significant interaction was observed between HIV status and either treatment or cancer stage, there was a marginally significant survival benefit for HIV-positive patients diagnosed at Stage 1 (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.13–1.07, p = 0.068).
A similar marginally significant two-way interaction emerged when comparing the control video with the porn baseline , B = 74.60, t (23427) = 1.824, p = 0.068, 95% CI: −5.569, 154.772.
For example, the association of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency with T2D risk was marginally significant after complete adjustments (adjusted HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.96–2.84; P = 0.068).
Additionally, a marginally significant relationship ( t = 1.946, p = 0.068) was observed between decreased progesterone levels from LFP to PMP and FWHM reductions in the left STG in the MRM group (Figure 3D ).