Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp -value = 0.0320.6× alphagold
An individual level cross-sectional analysis conducted in India indicated that there is a marginally significant positive relationship between arsenic intake from rice and the changes of LDL ( p -value = 0.032) [ 34 ], which complies with the results in our study.
marginally significantp < .0320.6× alphagold
The proportional hazards test of the habitat × hypoxia interaction term had a marginally significant p < .032 and only when clones were treated as fixed effects; it was not significant in the coxme analysis with clones as a random nested effect (Table 2 ); likewise, the clone x hypoxia interaction was not significant (Table 2 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0330.7× alphagold
Based on the 45 sequences, lmo0693 showed marginally significant evidence for recombination with NSS (P = 0.033) and no evidence for recombination with the other three methods, largely consistent with the genome-wide recombination analyses, which found no evidence for recombination in this gene.
marginally significantp=.0330.7× alphagold
We observed no significant differences between online and in-lab data across two of the three conditions (Harmonic, Random Phase, Z=1.77, p=.076, Pure Tone, Z=1.86, p=.063, using two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum tests), and a marginally significant difference in one condition (Harmonic, Sine Phase, Z=2.14, p=.033).
Harmonicity aids hearing in noise.
Atten Percept Psychophys · 2022 · PMC8803411
marginally significantp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
Nepal) with anger outcomes was marginally significant ( β = 0.1841, p = 0.033).
marginally significantp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
Among older African Americans, however, the association between having none or one vs two or more recent stressors strengthened over time (and marginally significant in 2012) to become more protective for SRH declines (time*stress, p = 0.033).
marginally significantp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
Overall quality of life, the main study outcome measure, showed a decline between baseline ( M = 5.29, SD = 1.29) and M3 ( M = 5.14, SD = 1.32) ( t (583) = 3.71; p < 0.001) and then increased back to levels comparable to those at baseline (M6: M = 5.48, SD = 1.16; M9: M = 5.48, SD = 1.19; M12: M = 5.52, SD = 1.23), with all changes relative to M3 being significant at p < 0.001 and changes from M0 being non-significant ( p = 0.14 and p = 0.17 for M6 and M9, respectively) or marginally significant ( p = 0.033 for M12).