“marginally significant”

In addition, there was a marginally significant two-way interaction between Outcome and Length of Streak, wald X 2 (1) = 3.36, p = 0.067, odds ratio = 0.77, such that longer streaks increased the belief that a trend would continue.

Interestingly, the previous number of manic episodes had a marginally significant but positive effect on early discharge (adjusted OR = 1.08, p = .067), which suggests that while early discharge was driven by mania improvement during the first 7 days, the patient's history of recurrence of mania was not considered in making early discharge decisions.

The effects of Gf were significant for the Gross Food (β = −0.28 [−0.50, −0.06], p = 0.011) and marginally significant for the Terrible Movie (β = −0.36 [−0.75, 0.03], p = 0.067) metaphors but not the Boring Class (−0.08 [−0.44, 0.27], p = 0.644).

We found a marginally significant effect of COVID-19 lockdown for free days ( F (1, 312) = 3.382; p = .067; η 2 = 0.011; M before = 08:32, SD = 01:00; M during = 08:23, SD = 01:10), but not for workdays ( F (1, 312) = 0.399; p = .528; η 2 = 0.001), similar to the results reported above.

T0) follow-up were found for relaxation (β = .42) and positive thinking (β = .53), whereas the intervention effect on helplessness was marginally significant (β = -.36, p = .067; Table II ).

= 0.10, t 67 = 2.83, p = 0.006, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.09, 0.49]) and marginally significant for fatigue ( b = 0.29, s.e. = 0.15, t 78 = 1.86, p = 0.067, 95% CI [−0.02, 0.59]) but not tense arousal ( b = 0.18, s.e. = 0.13, t 62 = 1.37, p = 0.177, 95% CI [−0.08, 0.43]).

The current intimate touch (CIT) scale was identified as a marginally significant predictor of the quadratic velocity terms for 0.4 N touch ( F (1, 23) = 3.68, p = .067).

Controlling for the influence of subregional differences, generalised linear mixed models showed that elevation was significantly and positively related to species richness (estimated coefficient = 0.75, standard error = 0.20, t value = 3.72, P = 0.0002, n = 69) and, albeit marginally significant, abundance (estimated coefficient = 1.16, standard error = 0.66, t value = 1.83, P = 0.067, n = 69).

Interestingly, although TBARS concentrations displayed only a marginally significant association with VPA-caused liver dysfunction ( p = 0.067), there was a 2.6-fold (95% CI: 0.693–6.436) increased risk for liver dysfunction progression.

However, both sexes exhibited a significant increase in DBP following exposure to noise C at 90 dB, and a marginally significant increase in SBP (men p=0.067; women p=0.167).

N400a Analysis without including midline electrodes showed that Group by Semantic judgment by Hemisphere interaction was marginally significant (F(2, 38) = 2.9, p = .067).

However, and in line with H1b, we find a marginally significant and positive effect of conservative-leaning newspapers on the counteractivating frame ( B = 3.33, SE = 1.83, p = .067).

Additionally, a marginally significant positive relationship was observed with the intradensity of the unaffected hemisphere ( R 2 =0.21, p =0.067) for the same subset/band.

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between the infant’s mean Hr and the caregiver’s S-PICTS score in the CT-optimal condition ( ρ = −0.55, p = 0.067) but not in the slow or in the fast velocity conditions (respectively ρ = .068, p = 0.811 and ρ = .309, p = 0.283).

The main effects of moral scenario, F (1, 39) = 285.86, p < 0.001, η 2 g = 0.71, and temperature, F (1, 39) = 5.33, p = 0.026, η 2 g = 0.08, were significant, and the interaction between temperature and scenario was marginally significant, F (1, 39) = 3.54, p = 0.067, η 2 g = 0.03.

Regarding changes in relatedness ( ΔQGM ), we observed a negative association with ALL G , which was statistically significant in Site 2 ( F 1,47.9 = 8.97, p = 0.004), and marginally significant in Site 1 ( F 1,49.8 = 3.51, p = 0.067; Table S4 ).

The interaction effect between condition and measure was marginally significant in post-induction, F (1, 82) = 3.44, p < 0.067, η p 2 = 0.04, and simple effect analysis showed that the N3 mean amplitudes of incongruence were greater than that of congruence at post-induction (all ps < 0.01), whereas such an effect was not found at the baseline or post-intervention (all ps > 0.05).

This difference was marginally significant (p = .067, 95% CI [−.983, .026]).

The HC group showed an insignificant negative effect (Effect = -0.013, p = 0.181), while the FEP group showed an insignificant marginally significant positive effect (Effect = 0.014, p = 0.067).

The analysis revealed a significant interaction between test and culture in 6- and 7-year-olds F (4, 372) = 5.49, MSE = 4.72, p = 0.001, and F (4, 476) = 3.01, MSE = 3.20, p = 0.018, respectively, and a marginally significant interaction in 8-year-olds, F (4, 460) = 2.21, MSE = 2.25, p = 0.067.

high [marginally significant] t = −2.243, p = .067) and lower environmental viscosity (ANOVA: F 2,139 = 11.34; p < .0001; Tukey post hoc tests: low vs. intermediate t = −3.823, p < .001; low vs. high t = −4.37, p < .001) (Figure 3a , Table S3 ).

Our meta-regression of fecundity responses indicated a marginally significant generation effect across all three taxa, with relative hybrid fecundity increasing over subsequent generations (β gen ± SE = 0.106 ± 0.058, Z = 1.83, P = 0.067, I 2 = 95.6%), although this relationship varied across taxa (Fig. 2 a).

In STARR, other statins were associated with reduced colectomy rates as well (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.57–1.01; Supplementary Table 5 ) that was marginally significant ( P = .067).

In the crude model, the inactive health-related behavior class was significantly associated with greater levels of IL-6 ( β = 0.187, SE (standard error) = 0.069, p = 0.007) and cMetS ( β = 0.921, SE = 0.392, p = 0.020), whereas the positive association between the inactive health-related behavior class and hs-CRP ( β = 0.228, SE = 0.124) were marginally significant ( p = 0.067).

Although participants did not differentially detect human stimuli across the two conditions, there was evidence that they were more likely to detect odors in general in the sweat condition: participants reported having smelled nothing in 41 percent of the control sessions but in only 22 percent of the experimental sessions; a binary mixed logistic regression model revealed a marginally significant, within-subject effect of experimental condition on the likelihood of having reported detection of any scent ( b = 1.13, p = 0.067, Exp ( b ) = 3.10).