“marginally significant”

3 a and b) and differences for SKJ were marginally significant (Mann-Whitney test: p -value = 0.067, Fig. 3 c).

In the crude model, the inactive health-related behavior class was significantly associated with greater levels of IL-6 ( β = 0.187, SE (standard error) = 0.069, p = 0.007) and cMetS ( β = 0.921, SE = 0.392, p = 0.020), whereas the positive association between the inactive health-related behavior class and hs-CRP ( β = 0.228, SE = 0.124) were marginally significant ( p = 0.067).

The analysis revealed a significant interaction between test and culture in 6- and 7-year-olds F (4, 372) = 5.49, MSE = 4.72, p = 0.001, and F (4, 476) = 3.01, MSE = 3.20, p = 0.018, respectively, and a marginally significant interaction in 8-year-olds, F (4, 460) = 2.21, MSE = 2.25, p = 0.067.

(AB/AC), which was marginally significant (p=0.067).

There were marginally significant differences in P1 amplitude for no makeup, light makeup, and heavy makeup, Makeup type: F (2, 21) = 3.08, p = .067, η p 2 = .23.

Generally, North American and European experts disagreed on the ranking of priorities, with an exception for the importance of Biodiversity and Taxonomic Challenges, for which the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of their overall category rankings indicated marginally significant correlation ( r s = 0.633, p = 0.067).

The interaction between FCLD and habitat in the full model was marginally significant (estimate = −0.075 ± 0.041, p = 0.067; Table 1a ), suggesting that the selection tended to be stronger in the forest.

Our results indicate that there is a marginally significant cross-level relationship between group-level change impact and change fairness interactions for change self-efficacy (γ = -0.53, p = 0.067) and positive experience to change (γ = -0.47, p = 0.054), as shown in Model 4 and Model 10 in Table 3 .

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that a marginally significant interaction trend ( p = 0.067) suggested a tendency for male kayakers to exhibit higher baseline cortisol levels compared to male canoeists.

β = 0.547, p = 0.067, marginally significant).

However, we further explored disease-free survival (DFS) in early-stage (n=162), and the result suggested that higher expression of PRAME was marginally significant (P=0.067) related to higher recurrence ( Figure S2C ).

In addition, a marginally significant difference was found between the father’s occupation as a farmer and the number of bacteria in the children’s microbiota (p = 0.067), where 60% of sons of a farmer had 0–2 bacteria (60%) (Table 1 ).

Additionally, a Session × Rhythm Set interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 10) = 4.21, p = .067.

T0) follow-up were found for relaxation (β = .42) and positive thinking (β = .53), whereas the intervention effect on helplessness was marginally significant (β = -.36, p = .067; Table II ).

= 0.10, t 67 = 2.83, p = 0.006, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.09, 0.49]) and marginally significant for fatigue ( b = 0.29, s.e. = 0.15, t 78 = 1.86, p = 0.067, 95% CI [−0.02, 0.59]) but not tense arousal ( b = 0.18, s.e. = 0.13, t 62 = 1.37, p = 0.177, 95% CI [−0.08, 0.43]).

Walking speed was also reduced by the Combination of the insecticides, with a mean of 2.79 cm·s − 1 (95% CI: 2.19–3.38 cm·s−1) marginally significant ( z = -1.829, p = 0.067), with a reduction of -0.78 cm·s − 1 (95% CI: -1.62–0.06) by its Combination with Deltamethrin.

We observed a marginally significant association between chronic stress and rTL ( p = 0.067).

A marginally significant interaction effect between products and adjectives (F[1,20] = 3.744, p = 0.067; η 2 = 0.158) was been observed.

The current intimate touch (CIT) scale was identified as a marginally significant predictor of the quadratic velocity terms for 0.4 N touch ( F (1, 23) = 3.68, p = .067).

This corresponded to mean cyberbullying victimization reductions of 0.40 to 0.65 instances/2 weeks, where the interaction term comparing the reduction in the intervention arm to the control arm was marginally significant in the PP analysis without MI ( P =.067) but was increasingly nonsignificant in other models, ranging up to P =.301 for ITT with MI.

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between the infant’s mean Hr and the caregiver’s S-PICTS score in the CT-optimal condition ( ρ = −0.55, p = 0.067) but not in the slow or in the fast velocity conditions (respectively ρ = .068, p = 0.811 and ρ = .309, p = 0.283).

When analyzed based on 500 beds, there were marginally significant differences (> 500 vs. ≤ 500, p=0.067).

For the IQ-matched control group there was only a marginally significant main effect of TRIPLET, (F(1,12) = 4.05, MSE = 0.001, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0.25), whereas the main effect of EPOCH was not significant, (F(3,36) = 0.48, MSE = 0.004, p = 0.70, η p 2 = 0.04).

However, in the normal calcium subgroup (2.1-2.5 mmol/L), a marginally significant positive trend was observed (R 2 = 0.017, P = 0.067).

Notably, Karnofsky's performance scores (KPS) and clinical stage showed a marginally significant association with OS ( P = 0.067 and P = 0.088) (Figure 1B and 1C ), suggesting they might be additional confounding factors required for control.