“marginally significant”

The main effect of ethnicity was marginally significant, indicating slightly higher values for white B = –0.32 [–0.61, –0.03] compared to black participants, B = –0.11, p = 0.030.

When comparing across metabolites, we found a significant difference in correlation coefficients between GABA+ and Glx in LO ( p = 0.001) and a marginally significant difference in EVC ( p = 0.03).

Similarly, the mean triglyceride level was lower in the cases (121.86 ± 59.20 mg/dL) than in the controls (138.53 ± 48.20 mg/dL), with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.03).

Regarding rapid naming accuracy which had marginally significant improvement after the intervention ( p = .03), the trend of improvement in TPT ( p = .05) also seemed more apparent than that of CLR ( p = .18).

Treatment had a marginally significant effect on proportion of total iridoid glycosides that was catalpol sequestered by butterflies [X 2 = 15.9, df = 7, P = 0.03] (see Fig.

Nonetheless, when only age was included as covariate, there was a marginally significant effect of MMR status ( P = .03).

Furthermore, marginally significant association was also observed for lung cancer and head neck cancer with OR of 2.38 (95%CI: 1.06-5.36, P=0.03) and of 2.40 (95%CI: 1.46-3.93, P=0.001), respectively.

Selection of treatment strategy on the basis of 18 F-FDG PET/CT alone was significantly associated with the survival outcomes at nine months (P=0.03) and marginally significant at 12 months (P=0.03).

There was a marginally significant interaction of cue presence and directional cue type, F (1,81) = 4.67, p = .03, η p 2 = .06, indicating, if anything, that there was a larger difference in performance between the control and arrow conditions than the control and human figure conditions.

In addition, the univariate comparisons indicated a marginally significant main effect of personalised risk message on positive outcome expectancies, F (1, 324) = 5.00, p = .03, η p 2 = .02 (α = .025).

Marginally significant differences were observed in Zurich ( P = 0.03) and Midland ( P = 0.04), but no pairwise comparison remained significant after global Bonferroni correction ( Table S9 ; Fig.

Across TE insertion loci, we found only a marginally significant difference in the TE frequency among S12 compared to non-S12 isolates (p=0.03, Figure 5—figure supplement 1 ).

The effect of trauma center level remained marginally significant after controlling for ISS score (p = 0.03, delta BIC = 2.3).

[ 23 ], their cohort included adults and children with IgAN and a correlation between percent Gd-IgA1/IgA and contemporaneous UPCR was found to be marginally significant ( r = 0.25, P = 0.03).

Marginally significant ability was detected for NLR values (AUC: 0.563, 95% CI: 0.505 to 0.621; P = 0.030), and the abilities of other leukocyte subtypes to discriminate an LVO were not significant (Figure S 1 and Table S 2 in the Supplementary material).

In the 6 case studies involving more than one display trait, there was never a significant relationship between trait means and our estimates for Δt ( P ≥ 0.31) or for Δp ( P ≥ 0.33); in four of the case studies the relationship between trait mean and preference strength was also non-significant ( P ≥ 0.35), but in 2 case studies it was significant or marginally significant ( Gryllus spp.; P = 0.03; Enchenopa ; P = 0.07, although the latter relationship was negative).

Additionally, the difference between the depression control and bipolar test groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.03), and a significant difference was found between bipolar test and bipolar control groups ( p < 0.01).

Among the naturally varying photographs, gender typicality again significantly predicted women’s perceived sexual orientation, β = .92, z = 34.13, p < .001, but, in contrast with the neutral photographs, so did emotion (a marginally significant result in Study 2), β = .05, z = 2.13, p = .03.

The approximately 40-kDa procathepsin B exhibited a marginally significant increase of 93±27% (mean±SEM; P<0.03) in the PADK-treated group as compared to vehicle-injected transgenic mice samples ( Fig. 4A and B ).

For major coronary events in the primary prevention trials, the 11 separate tests for trend or heterogeneity of effect yielded only one, between men and women, that was marginally significant (p=0·03; figure 3 and webappendix p 4 ) if considered in isolation, but it was no longer significant if multiplied by 11 to allow for multiple comparisons (p=0·33).

There was no statistically detectable interaction among the treatments ( F 1,6 = 0.29, p = 0.59); however, there was a marginally significant brood effect ( F 6,18 = 2.9, p = 0.03).

The chi-square value of the goodness of fit test was marginally significant (p = 0.03) owing to a lack of observations between 5 and 10 m, but was not deemed sufficient to prevent using the model for inference.

In contrast, StromalScore demonstrated weaker yet marginally significant correlations across datasets ( p value ≈ 0.03–0.09), indicating that high-TIL-80 score tumors exhibit both increased immune infiltration and modest stromal enrichment.

When these factors were included in the model, there was at best marginally significant evidence for associations with tubular growth pattern (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.93; P = 0.03) and tubule formation (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.97 to 2.78; P = 0.07).

Inspection of the standardised β-values indicated that the contrast between the Best-Practice interview and the RI interview was marginally significant ( p = .03): children in the RI condition tended to recall fewer setting details (although note that numbers of setting details recalled were small across all interview conditions).