Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
However, the results in model 1 suggested that participants in overweight group had a decreased risk of low HGS compared to normal weight individuals (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56–0.81), while the obesity group showed a marginally significant decreased risk (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58–1.01, p = 0.063).
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
4.5.4 Ascending rate of blood glucose With respect to the ascending rate of blood glucose during the two-hour postprandial period, the interaction effect between the multigrain intervention and exercise was not statistically significant [Wald χ 2 (4) = 2.321, p = 0.677]; the main effect of the multigrain intervention type did not reach statistical significance but demonstrated a marginally significant trend [Wald χ 2 (4) = 8.910, p = 0.063]; and the main effect of exercise was not statistically significant [Wald χ 2 (1) = 0.003, p = 0.955].
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Compared to the Col-0 wildtype, the frd3-3 mutant showed a significant reduction of root growth in response to high Zn according to the 2-way ANOVA ( p < 0.001) while the genotype x treatment interaction was marginally significant for frd3-7 ( p = 0.063) (Fig. 1d, e , Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2 and 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Two-way ANOVAs revealed a main effect of reward value on felt achievement [ M high value = 5.03, M low value = 4.41; F (1, 259) = 9.40, p = 0.002, ω p 2 = 0.031] and a marginally significant main effect of reward value on competence [ M high value = 4.77, M low value = 4.43; F (1, 259) = 3.47, p = 0.063, ω p 2 = 0.009].
Deriving Mental Energy From Task Completion.
Front Psychol · 2021 · PMC8418126
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
The analysis yielded a main effect of competitive intragroup outcome interdependence, F (1,137) = 29.27, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.176, and a significant Strategies × Competitive Intragroup Outcome Interdependence interaction, F (1,137) = 18.58, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.119, and a marginally significant Results Presentation × Strategies interaction, F (1,137) = 3.52, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.025.
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Looking at descriptive results, establishing a green office was associated with lower pre-questionnaire self-efficacy ( M established = 5.07, M not_established = 5.24), higher collective efficacy ( M established = 5.47, M not_established = 5.31), lower participatory efficacy ( M established = 4.54, M not_established = 4.88), and more volunteer time ( M established = 5.85, M not_established = 4.13) that also emerged as marginally significant predictor ( p = 0.063).