“marginally significant”

The MANOVA revealed a marginally significant trend for a resource level * fish density interaction on chlorophyll- a (F 4,27 = 2.537, p = 0.063).

However, the results in model 1 suggested that participants in overweight group had a decreased risk of low HGS compared to normal weight individuals (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56–0.81), while the obesity group showed a marginally significant decreased risk (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58–1.01, p = 0.063).

While there was no significant difference in seropositivity in the overall sample ( P = .136), the difference between forestry workers and healthcare/office workers was marginally significant ( P = .063).

A marginally significant association was found between rs180326 and TG after controlling for the top signal of rs651821 ( P = 0.063).

The only factor that showed marginally significant difference between groups was internalizing behavior problems (p = .063).

those who had not (17 participants) correctly indicated the frequent distractor region, in a group × distractor condition analysis of variance (ANOVA), revealed [besides a significant distractor condition main effect: F (1.37,31.52) = 38.12, p < 0.001; Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected values] a marginally significant interaction, F (1.37,31.52) = 2.38, p = 0.063 (Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected values).

In the GEE analysis ( Supplementary Table S2 ), although the linear effect of time was marginally significant (estimate = 0.509, p = 0.063), the quadratic time term (Day 2 ) remained significantly negative (estimate = −0.017, p = 0.017), indicating a nonlinear trend in glycemic variability.

But in puberty those differences were marginally significant ( P =0.063).

001, d = 1.18) and marginally significant higher on IOS ( t (53.92) = 1.90, p = 0.063, d = 0.46) than native Dutch.

On multivariate analysis, a total dose ≥63 Gy, a single site of metastatic disease, and undergoing ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for better OS ( P = 0.007, P = 0.014, and P = 0.038, respectively); radiotherapy involving metastatic sites was a marginally significant prognostic factor ( P = 0.063).

Period and microhabitat had non significant effects on the GLMM ( p > 0.4), but the interaction term was marginally significant ( p = 0.063; Table 2 ). 3.4 Seed dispersal effectiveness Seed dispersal effectiveness provided by different bird groups (residents, and sub‐Saharan and European migrants) changed remarkably in time due to temporal changes in the quantity and quality components (Figure 4 a).

The Emotion × Self-Relevance × Task × Region interaction was marginally significant in the mid-regions omnibus [ F (8,384) = 2.32, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.046] and not significant in the peripheral regions omnibus [ F (2,96) = 0.72, p = 0.489, η 2 = 0.015].

When comparing between the two groups, the improvement in scores was higher in the hands-on training group than the observational training group, and this was marginally significant (p=0.063).

The number of successes out of 6 initial probe trials in individual animals was marginally significant ( p = 0.063) in 4 conditions, and significant ( p = 0.009) in one condition (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).

Declines in HR and SDNN for women showed marginally significant differences in the rate of change across age groups ( P =0.063 and P =0.060) (Table 3 ).

Emotional support of mothers was also found to be marginally significant (OR=2.25, p value=0.063) and those with a lack of emotional support were at greater odds of developing symptoms of depression.

Looking at descriptive results, establishing a green office was associated with lower pre-questionnaire self-efficacy ( M established = 5.07, M not_established = 5.24), higher collective efficacy ( M established = 5.47, M not_established = 5.31), lower participatory efficacy ( M established = 4.54, M not_established = 4.88), and more volunteer time ( M established = 5.85, M not_established = 4.13) that also emerged as marginally significant predictor ( p = 0.063).

Weight loss was significantly associated with poor DMFS ( P = 0.006) as well as OS ( P < 0.001), and had a marginally significant influence on PFS ( P = 0.063).

Results: Probiotic supplementation significantly influenced acetate titer (p=0,032) marginally significant for propionate and butyrate (p=0.063 and p=0.068, respectively) and the respondent with increasing SCFA’s metabolite are higher in probiotic group compared to the respondents in placebo group.

Higher perceived COVID-19 risk predicted greater depressive symptoms ( p < 0.001), particularly among adults with histories of childhood trauma, though this effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.063).

In male participants, the difference for the change score was marginally significant with VAS-insecurity scores decreasing in the placebo group and increasing in the Lpc-37 group from baseline to end of study ( Table S9 ; P = 0.063).

Neither of the main effects of group nor gender on the proportion of errors corrected were significant (all F s < 0.31, p s > 0.57, η p 2 s < 0.01), however, there was a marginally significant interaction between group and gender, F (3, 132) = 2.5, p = 0.063, η p 2 < 0.054.

The marginally significant decrease was observed in plasma putrescine levels in the DFMO-treated ( p = 0.063) and the DFMO/Sulindac-treated ( p = 0.053) aged male mouse groups ( Table S9 ). 3.2.3.

While warming had a marginally significant negative effect on protein depolymerization ( p = .0630), eCO 2 significantly increased amino acid consumption rates (Table 1 , Figure 2a,b ).

unpracticed items) showed a marginally significant main effect of delay , F (3,92) = 2.51, M S E = 0.05, p = .063, η 2 = 0.08, and a main effect of item type , F (1,92) = 66.48, M S E = 0.03, p < .001, η 2 = 0.42, but no interaction between the two factors, F (3,92) < 1.