“marginally significant”

In the overall measure of instructional quality, there was only a marginally significant difference between GTAs from University A and GTAs from University B ( p = 0.06).

In the SI condition, O showed no significant arm motion in the pre-MI period ( χ 2 (1) = 0.93, p = 0.33), and Y showed marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 3.54, p = 0.06) forward motion.

Latent period decreased with increasing pustule density on all host genotypes and there was a marginally significant (p = 0.06) interaction effect between pustule density and host genotype on latent period (Table 4 ).

Marginally significant differences were found between Staphylococcus aureus IMI in pregnant heifers compared to cows in their second and later lactations (p = 0.06, p = 0.05, respectively) but no significant differences between heifers and cows in their first lactation.

Interaction between the two factors was marginally significant (F = 3.644, p = 0.060).

There was a marginally significant difference in diversification rates between small and large chromosome clades ( P = 0.06, Mann-Whitney U-test).

There were also marginally significant interactions between tillage and sampling time each year (2012: F 5,40 = 2.29, P = 0.06 and 2013: F 5,40 = 2.33, P = 0.06).

The Stimulation type × Period interaction was marginally significant ( F [2, 354] = 2.8, p = .06).

However, the simple slope for teachers with high-stress levels (84 th percentile) was negative and marginally significant, b = -0.14, SE = 0.07, p = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.30, 0.00].

However, this difference in recurrence frequency is marginally significant (chi‐square test, P = 0.06). 3.4.

The Trees & Bio group saw a marginally significant improvement over the No GI group ( p = 0.06).

Quantitative analysis revealed a marginally significant upward trend in XBP1u expression (1.85-fold, P = 0.06) in our FXR −/− mice compared with wild-type controls, as evidenced by protein immunoblotting.

Comparison between pulses revealed that survival of beetles from high complexity landscape (HC) was 23% higher after the second pulse compared to the first, but the observed difference was marginally significant (t-ratio = 1.861, df = 166, p = 0.06).

In the face conditions, the connectivities from FFA to dlPFC and PPA to FFA were significantly modulated ( t -test < 0.05) and PPA to dlPFC was also found marginally significant ( p = 0.06; Figure 6B ).

In beta band, graph density was higher, while small-worldness was lower during the alcohol (see Figure 2B ); however, these effects were marginally significant (p = 0.06).

Results and Conclusion: Fatal outcome in terms of death and permanent disability was 34.24% and they had higher marginally significant ( P = 0.06), SISS score (45.17 ± 12.59).

However, at 6 months postinjury, the correlation between PbtO 2 signals and GOS scores ( Figure 3(c) ) was still marginally significant ( P = 0.060). 4.

Allelic and genotypic odds ratios for individual SNPs As shown in Table 4 , the G allele and the GG genotype of the -11377C>G SNP significantly increased the risk of obesity (OR, 1.48 and 2.30, respectively, in the G3 group), although the regression model for the genotypic test was marginally significant (p=0.06).

The group difference in smoking was marginally significant ( P = 0.06), with patients smoking more than controls.

In the olfactory preference experiment, across 28 test trials the overall population showed a marginally significant preference for the orange odor ( t 27 = 1.953, p = 0.06).

The age differences during post-test were marginally significant [χ 2 (2, N = 342) = 5.63, p = 0.06, Cramer’s V = 0.13], indicating, in line with this latter finding, that the adults tended to choose the teacher less often than did the 7- and 10-year-olds.

Haplotype TAGCGT of block rs9525641-rs2277439-rs2324851-rs2875459-rs2200287-rs9533166 of TNFSF11 showed marginally significant association with AAM ( P = 0.06).

Attachment-related avoidance was a marginally significant predictor ( t (286) = 1.90, P < 0.06).

There was a marginally significant association between HCP advice to lose weight and frequency of salad consumption (e b = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.30; p = 0.06).

Additionally, Cat activity showed marginally significant 1.3-fold enhancement ( P = 0.06, Fig. 6D ).