“marginally significant”

The model yielded a significant main effect of depersonalization, F (1,40) = 5.29; p = 0.03, η p 2 = 0.12, and a marginally significant effect of time of assessment, F (1,40) = 3.68; p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.08.

The largest Euclidean distance value, which was seen in channel 9 for the pro-life video, was marginally significant at P < 0.06.

Preliminary Analyses Parental background variables (i.e., parents’ age and education at the time of their child’s birth) and adolescent background variables (i.e., age at the adolescence assessment and intelligence scores measured at 13.5 years of age) did not correlate with any of the dependent variables, r s < 0.20, p s > 0.15, except for mother’s years of education, which had a marginally significant correlation with adolescents’ N2 amplitude at age 17 years, r = −0.25, p = 0.06; therefore, it was controlled in further analyses.

A Mantel test showed a positive correlation between the genetic differentiations (F ST ) and the linearized geographic distances with a marginally significant statistical support (Euclidean distance; r = 0.3, p = 0.06; Figure 2 ).

The results showed that the difference in the inverse efficiency score between English and Chinese words was marginally significant ( t (22) = −1.94, p = .06).

Younger patients (age <65) could get marginally significant OS benefit rather than PFS benefit from ICIs (univariate: HR 1.526, P=0.060; multivariate: HR 1.593, P=0.050).

We also observed significant difference between early exposure and controllable ( z = −2.13, p = 0.017) and a marginally significant difference between late exposure and uncontrollable ( z = 1.55, p = 0.06) phases.

Only neighborhood social cohesion was marginally significant (p = .06).

According to non-parametric tests for the data showing ceiling effects, the accuracy of the easier questions was significantly higher for the Note group than the Tablet group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, W = 179, p = 0.04), and the difference between the Note and Device groups was marginally significant ( W = 164, p = 0.06).

reported that, among patients, having family members infected by SARS was a marginally significant predictive factor ( p = 0.06) of having psychotic disorder during the treatment phase [ 20 ].

Simple effect analysis showed that significant or marginally significant differences between the valid and invalid locations occurred at electrodes P4, P7, and P8 (P4v-i = − 0.507 μV, p = 0.06; P7v-i = − 0.506 μV, p < 0.01; P8v-i = − 0.538 μV, p < 0.05), and a significant maximum difference between the valid and invalid locations was found in the P8 electrode (− 0.538 μV).

When we assessed the interaction between these two variables, adherence to the Mediterranean diet (continuous) and being a health professional, we found only a marginally significant p for interaction (p = 0.06).

The Change Type × Probe Location interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 19) = 3.95, p = .06, η p 2 = .17, 90% CI [.00, .39], BF 10 = 1.89, reflecting a tendency for the inside-triangle benefit to be larger for orientation changes (12%, p < .0001, d z = 0.88, BF 10 = 81.35) than for color changes (4%, p = .04, d z = 0.41, BF 10 = 1.78), though accuracy was significantly better for both orientation and color changes when they were part of the illusory triangle.

( Table 1 ) The two groups were comparable in terms of mean NDI during pre-operative period ( p -value = 0.060; marginally significant), 3 months post-surgery ( p -value = 0.445) and 1 year post-surgery ( p -value = 0.465).

Computational Modeling The two-way GLM on learning rate yielded a significant main effect of Time ( F (1, 44) = 21.76, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.33) and a marginally significant Time X Group interaction ( F (1, 44) = 3.58, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.075).

LGB-unrelated emotional task in HP and CD for the LGB group was considered, the GLM yielded a marginally significant Time x Task interaction for HP, F (1, 18) = 4.04, p = 0.06; η p 2 = 0.18.

Meanwhile, the interaction between condition, time, and group was marginally significant (F = 3.69, p = 0.06, η2 = 0.09).

Compared to patients not reporting ACE and anxiety comorbidity, the ACE + Anxiety group had elevated B cell, T cell, and macrophage infiltration, although this was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Living alone at baseline is considered a risk factor for a larger number of falls at the end of the study ( p = 0.004), and age is marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.060). 4.

There was a marginally significant interaction between emotion and AOI (F(6,282) = 2.1; p = 0.06).

Effects of the intervention on olfactory performance Linear mixed model (LMM) comparing the change in olfactory threshold as a result of the intervention between the two groups, controlling for age, revealed a marginally significant main effect of the intervention, F (1,318) = 3.4, p = 0.06, and a significant and robust main effect of group, F (1,318) = 199.8, p < 0.001, but no interaction of these two factors, F (1,318) = 0.02, p = 0.88, suggesting a small increase in olfactory sensitivity in both groups as a result of the intervention.

Significant main effects for EF strength ( F (2,200) = 25.56, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.12) and ion presence ( F (1,201) = 8.40, p < 0.005, η p 2 = 0.04) as well as a marginally significant interaction between both factors ( p = 0.06) were found.

A repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of GLP1-RA treatment on several efficacy measures over time, revealing that there was a statistically significant difference in mean HbA1c ( p = 0.003), BW ( p = 0.0013) and BMI ( p = 0.0015) between at least two groups, and a marginally significant difference in FPG ( p = 0.06).

A marginally significant difference was found between SS-nL patients and HCs (44.5% vs. 38.7%, OR [95% CI]: 1.27 [0.99–1.60], p = 0.06).

There was a high level of variability in prevalence between tanks (standard deviation 6 on the log odds scale) but irrigation type remained marginally significant ( P = 0·06).