“marginally significant”

Furthermore, the interaction between lHC grading and ADAS‐13 was significant for eMCI ( t = −2.22, p = .03) and lMCI ( t = −2.74, p = .006), and marginally significant for AD ( t = −1.85, p = .06); that is, the slopes of changes in ADAS‐13 scores associated with changes in lHC grading were significantly steeper in all disease cohorts in comparison with the NCs.

RESULTS Lp-PLA2 levels were higher among American men (301.7 ±82.6 ng/mL) than Japanese men (275.9 ±104.7 ng/mL); the difference was marginally significant (p=0.060, Table 1 ).

There was a significant interaction between sentence-effect compatibility and action-effect relation [ F (1, 38) = 8.04, MSE = 38.89, p = 0.007] and a marginally significant interaction between sentence-effect compatibility and SOA [ F (4, 152) = 2.67, MSE = 50.92, p = 0.06].

Significant difference in SBP change followed by age, BMI and Bonferroni correction was observed at the end of 2 weeks (genotype*gender, P = 0.028), and a marginally significant difference in MAP change at the end of 6 weeks was also observed (genotype*gender, P = 0.060).

However, overall connectivity between mFus and STS was less than mFus to other areas, significant in ITS/MOG ( t -test, t = 2.31, p = 0.04, one-tailed) and marginally significant in IOG ( t = 2.16, p = 0.06, one-tailed), but not significant in aIT ( t = 1.48, p = 0.11, one-tailed).

MANCOVA revealed that there was a marginally significant main effect of victim’s views, Wilk’s λ = .94, F (2, 90) = 2.86, p = .06, partial ŋ 2 = .06.

Notably, the main effect of trialwise preference remained marginally significant when an additional variable representing the general preference (see below) was additionally included in the model ( p = 0.06).

While the effect of baseline gait speed on subsequent mental intactness was slightly attenuated and became marginally significant (β=.030, 95% CI 0.002-0.061; P =.06), the reverse pathway still strongly held (β=.084, 95% CI 0.049-0.120; P <.001; Multimedia Appendix 2 ).

The Dunn test for multiple comparisons, with p -values adjusted with Holm’s method, shows a marginally significant difference ( p -value = 0.06) between the orthologous gene counts of Aveiro Lagoon and of Sado River.

There is a significant difference when comparing the mean RMCBS slopes of symptomatic infected C57BL/6 and infected balb/c (p = 0.01); a significant difference when comparing symptomatic infected C57BL/6 and non-infected C57BL/6 controls (p = 0.004); a marginally significant difference (p = 0.06) when comparing symptomatic infected C57BL/6 with asymptomatic infected C57BL/6; a non-significant difference when comparing infected balb/c and non-infected control balb/c (p = 0.48); and a non-significant difference (p = 0.70) when comparing infected balb/c with asymptomatic infected C57BL/6 and non-infected control C57BL/6.

The difference between the stop and arrow projection conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.06). 6.

For the covert-attention task paradigm, there were also no significant correlations between IAF and any of the ERP components or the latency differences between components in the UVF ( Table 1 ), although a negative correlation between IAF and the C1 peak latency was marginally significant [ r (16) = −0.45, p = 0.06].

Furthermore, it was marginally significant following exclusion of participants with MDD ( p = .06, η p 2 = .08) or ADHD ( p = .06, η p 2 = .08).

The results showed that there was a significant interaction effect of diagnosis and age for negative effects on parents, F = 8.08, p < 0.001, as well as marginally significant interaction effects for negative effects on children, F = 2.41, p = 0.06, and lack of support from school, F = 2.49, p = 0.06.

At the uncorrected level, the detectability difference was also significant in the time window between saccade cue and saccade onset ( p = 0.027), and marginally significant during saccade ( p = 0.060).

Analysis of Cohort 2 revealed a similar, though marginally significant effect of MSEW, with MSEW mice again moving faster than controls (p = 0.06).

A similar pattern was evident at the 3-month follow-up, though marginally significant (50 % among men vs 38.9 % among women, p = 0.06); however, the effect was significant at the 6-month follow-up (50.7 % of men reported their spouse as their source of peer support vs 42.5 % of women, p = 0.04). 3.2.

Results We found marginally significant differences between AA and GG genotypes of waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) ( P = 0.06) and BAI ( P = 0.06) of participants after adjusting for potential confounders.

Correlations further indicated a marginally significant positive relationship between TLE and parent age ( r = 0.15, p = 0.06), and none between TLE and the other two potentially mediating factors, gender and immigrant status ( Table 4 ).

The main effect of condition was marginally significant, F (3, 66) = 2.71, MSE = 27.31, p = .06, η 2 p = .11, and a significant Group × Condition interaction was found, F (3, 66) = 4.37, MSE = 27.31, p = .01, η 2 p = .17, reflecting the fact that especially blinkers required a relatively long target duration in the rotated distractors condition.

A slight reduction of IgG2 levels, marginally significant (p= 0.06) was observed (Table IV and Fig. 2 A).

Results showed a significant effect of TIME [ F (1, 35) = 10.42, p = 0.003], in line with overall forgetting over the retention interval and a marginally significant effect of REGULARITY [ F (1, 35) = 3.79, p = 0.06], reflecting better temporal order memory for no-rule faces than rule faces, across groups and retrieval sessions ( Figure 5C ).

Yet, in our model, parrotfish density was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the component of variance was minor and lower than other significant variables (3.9%), and no interactions were observed with taxa.

However, after modifying the experimental procedure so that more dissonance was thought to be induced (i.e., making choice more important and meaningful), they found a marginally significant difference between preference change in the Rate-Choose-Rate condition and that in the Rate-Rate-Choose condition ( p = 0.06; Chen and Risen, 2010 ), suggesting that the mere act of making a choice seems to have an effect on preference over and above the artifact.

There was a positive and marginally significant relationship between changing diet and per capita incidence of ciguatera ( p = 0.06), and secondary medical problems and per capita incidence of ciguatera ( p = 0.08) ( Table 6 ).