“marginally significant”

The difference between the effect size for fusion versus sacred values was marginally significant ( z =1.85, p =0.06).

The effect of S1 on wrestling behavior was marginally significant (df = 10, t = 2.13, p = 0.06).

The social network without dependent infants ( N = 16) remained marginally significant (mean pathlength to the nearest case: 0.048, p = 0.060).

But this effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) with a wide CI due to the small sample.

With the addition of BMI, Step 2 was marginally significant, ΔR 2 = 0.04, F(2, 82) = 11.88, p ≤ 0.06, such that greater BMI was associated with greater SDRT, with BMI accounting for a marginal incremental amount of variance in incongruent RT variability beyond the associated descriptive variables, β = 0.19, t (82) = 1.93, p = 0.006.

Authoritative parenting practice showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.06) by adolescent sex, with a higher authoritative score among parents of boys.

Seedling growth response showed a similar trend that was marginally significant, with seedling growth decreasing as the initial seedling density increased ( p = .06, Figure 2b ; Table 2 ).

The reduction was statistically significant in adar2(RNAi) animals (p < 0.05) and marginally significant in adar1(RNAi) animals (p = 0.06).

The results were consistent with a similar study that was completed on healthy individuals with vitamin D deficiency and had revealed both treatment regimens significantly increased the serum 25- hydroxyl vitamin D level with a marginally significant trend in favor of oral (P=0·06) ( 28 ).

Manipulation check As Table 2 shows, for absolute change in mean values for the motive of kin care before and after the intervention, ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of the group assignment [ F (2, 966) = 11.274, p = 0.06].

The difference between ES and NS was marginally significant (H = 3.57, p = 0.06).

Aside from the interaction term of FoMO × condition being a marginally significant predictor of control ( p = 0.06), attachment anxiety and the interaction term of attachment anxiety × condition were not significant predictors of any fundamental need.

We also found a marginally significant interaction; F 1,581 = 3.53, p = 0.06, such that watching the video inflated people's confidence when the ‘without dying’ question was asked first.

As a result, there was a significant correlation between the intervention group and ΔDASS-anxiety ( r = 0.35, p < 0.05); ΔDASS-depression and ΔDASS-stress showed a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.29, p = 0.06; r = 0.26, p = 0.09, respectively).

However, the hypothesized negative association between relatedness need satisfaction and social media addiction was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), and Hypothesis 5 was not supported.

Compared with patients with > 2.00 g/dL of serum albumin concentration, those with 1.01–1.50 g/dL had a significantly lower cumulative probability of remission (P = 0.046) and those with ≤ 1.00 g/dL had lower cumulative probability of remission at marginally significant level (P = 0.060).

Behavioral Results Accuracy The repeated ANOVA results revealed a marginally significant congruency effect ( F = 3.64, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.09), such that the participants responded more accurately in the congruent trials ( M = 0.988, SD = 0.003) than in the incongruent trials ( M = 0.985, SD = 0.003).

Moreover, a marginally significant effect of the rs1799889 variant on TG (SMD = –0.09, 95% CI = –0.17 to 0.00, P = 0.06) and HDL-C [SMD = 0.14, 95% CI = –0.02 to 0.31, P = 0.09; Figure 5 ] levels was observed in the Asian population ( Table 1 ).

The effect was marginally significant [ F (1, 53) = 2.15, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.47].

There was a marginally significant effect on egoistic motives (b = 0.23, SE = 0.12, p = 0.06).

There was some evidence that grazer utilization may increase the percentage bare ground in tufted attractor‐dominated sites: the best model included only a positive and marginally significant effect of dung abundance on percentage bare ground ( F 1,13 = 4.312, p = .06; Figure 5 ; Table S7 ); however, the simpler intercept only model received similar support (ΔAICc = 1.115). 4.

The difference between treatment groups was marginally significant (estimate ± SE = 10.4 ± 5.2, t = 2.0, p = 0.06).

Results demonstrated that there was no significant difference between conditions in perceived efficacy [F(1,148) = .12, p = .73] and a marginally significant difference between the groups in perceived threat [F(1,148) = 3.65, p = .06].

For psychosocial determinants of FVC, a statistically significant interaction effect was found on intention ( P <.001) and planning ( P <.001), whereas the time×group effect was marginally significant for self-efficacy ( P =.06) and nonsignificant for social support ( P =.83).

In addition, there was a marginally significant increase in anxiety from pre- to post-testing, F = 3.46, p = 0.06, partial eta squared = 0.02.