“marginally significant”

The initial decrement of tumor size was a marginally significant positive predictor for PFS (P = 0.06). 20 The maximal benefit was also reported in patients with a better ECOG performance status. 6 Our clinical experience obtained a similar finding.

In the multivariate linear regression analysis, a marginally significant correlation was observed between TyG and length of hospital stay ( p = 0.06).

Regarding Europe, the short-term effect of clean energy shocks on tourism appears weakly negative and marginally significant ( p = 0.06), possibly reflecting transitional frictions or sectoral inertia.

Effects of Mindfulness Training on Cortisol The CAR measured over 3 workdays showed a marginally significant Group*Time interaction, controlling for baseline CAR, cohort, gender, years of policing, smoking status, and BMI [ χ 2 (2, N =13)=5.55, p =0.06, η 2 =0.04; Figure 3 ; Table 2 ].

Of note, after Bonferroni correction, Belief Updating was marginally significant in our Conviction model (corrected p = 0.060) and Distress model (corrected p = 0.066), while all other relationships upheld after correction.

Indeed, the effect of category on mirror recognition cost was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

In addition, there was a significant main effect of reinforcement (F(1,41) = 10.50, P = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.20), such that trials paired with shock showed greater amygdala activity than trials not paired with shock, and a marginally significant main effect of condition (F(1,41) = 3.89, P = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.09), such that trials paired with social support figures showed greater amygdala activity than trials paired with strangers.

The frontal positivity in Declinations was marginally significant relative to Pre-offers at the anterior medial region from 500 to 600 ms ( p = .06).

A similar non-significant lateralization pattern was found for magnetometers for face categorization (3.79 vs 4.18, p =0.26), which was marginally significant for the base frequency (18.71 vs 22.69, p =0.06).

A marginally significant relationship ( t (74) = − 1.9, p = .06) was found between gender and FoP indicating that women ( M = 27.2, SD = 7.9) tended to experience more FoP compared to men ( M = 23.4, SD = 6.7).

Nevertheless, there was a tendency for marginally significant ( p = 0.06–0.07) higher average intensity of AM colonization (M% and m%) in roots of the untreated trees than in roots of the trees treated with pesticides (Table 2 ).

However, among the 20 subjects who did use condoms there was also a marginally significant trend towards more vaginal E. coli (p = 0.06) and a highly significant increase in other enteric gram-negative rods (p = 0.001) after protected intercourse [ 106 ].

This study found that patients with hemorrhagic stroke had a higher incidence of falls with a marginally significant difference (p= 0.06) compared to patients with ischemic stroke.

AR 2 and AR 3 populations show a marginally significant deviation from expectation of neutrality ( p < 0.06 for AR 2 ; p < 0.07 for AR 3 ).

The main effect of outcome frequency (50% and 80% error rate conditions) was marginally significant ( F 1, 23 = 3.91, p = 0.06), showing that slower RT in the 50% (840 ± 20 ms) than in the 80% (833 ± 20 ms) error rate condition.

Of these 114 genes, 27 had an identified IRP2 peak in our data, an overlap that is marginally significant ( P = 0.06, Fisher’s Exact Test).

A marginally significant difference was found between SS-nL patients and HCs (44.5% vs. 38.7%, OR [95% CI]: 1.27 [0.99–1.60], p = 0.06).

However, the one-way ANOVA conducted on accuracy scores revealed a marginally significant effect of group ( p = 0.06) due to fact that the doubly low group displayed the lowest accuracy and differed from both the low-accuracy and the low-rate groups.

2nd, t (19) = −4.25, p < 0.001, and marginally significant between 1st vs. 4th, t (19) = −1.93, p = 0.06; the differences in negative mood were significant between 1st vs. 2nd, t (19) = 3.04, p < 0.01, and between 1st vs. 4th, t (19) = 4.65, p < 0.001; the differences in neutral mood were not significant between 1st vs. 2nd, t (19) = 1.51, p > 0.1, and between 1st vs. 4th, t (19) = 1.32, p > 0.1.

A marginally significant main effect of response set overlap was found, F (1.22, 105.10) = 3.473, p = .06, η p 2 = .04, driven by more excluded trials in the overlapping ( M = 10%, SD = 9%) than in the control condition ( M = 7%, SD = 12%), t (86) = 2.53, p = .04, Cohen’s d = .27.

Finally, regarding EE, a significant increase was seen in this variable from pre-test to post-test ( p = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.008–0.11), whereas a marginally significant decrease was found overall from post-test to follow-up ( p = 0.06, 95%CI: −0.003 to 0.18).

We observed a significant increase in the estimates of evolving HOMA-IR with increasing levels of oxLDL ( P < 0.001) and a marginally significant association with F 2 Isop ( P = 0.06).

A slight reduction of IgG2 levels, marginally significant (p= 0.06) was observed (Table IV and Fig. 2 A).

A repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of GLP1-RA treatment on several efficacy measures over time, revealing that there was a statistically significant difference in mean HbA1c ( p = 0.003), BW ( p = 0.0013) and BMI ( p = 0.0015) between at least two groups, and a marginally significant difference in FPG ( p = 0.06).

Analyses of variance showed marginally significant less differentiation of US-expectancies in the Probe compared to the No probe condition (Stimulus × Trial × Condition: F( 1,17) = 4.04, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.19; Fig. 2 ).