“marginally significant”

Also the response to left unilateral trials showed a marginally significant improvement in both the immediate and delayed post-hypnotic testing sessions (100% correct for both sessions vs. 9/12 correct before hypnosis, CHI2 (1) = 3.4, p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant reduction on HOMA-IR by 0.27 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.55; p = 0.06; I 2 = 0%) based on 3 studies (Fig. 3 ).

The intercept was marginally significant ( β ± SE : 0.65 ± 0.35, P = 0.06).

Blacks had marginally significant higher depressive symptoms (1.59 ± 0.65 vs. 1.54 ± 0.59, p = 0.06).

Nonetheless, the total effect was marginally significant ( b = −0.39; β = −0.10; 95% CI [−0.21–0.01], SE = 0.20, p = 0.06), which suggests the indirect and direct pathways accounted for variance in treatment-seeking intention to a small degree. 1 Discussion The current study examined the association between mental illness self-stigma, externalizing proneness, and the intention to seek treatment.

The difference between the Cooperative/Competitive and Altruistic treatments and the Atomistic and Control treatments is marginally significant ( p = 0.06) during the first month, but becomes insignificant as the treatments converge over time (see Fig. 9 ).

The difference in HE4 was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), which may be due to the small sample size of our study.

At the uncorrected level, the detectability difference was also significant in the time window between saccade cue and saccade onset ( p = 0.027), and marginally significant during saccade ( p = 0.060).

In the quit and maintenance phase, we found a marginally significant effect of using the medication tracking feature on the 6-week cessation status (Wald χ 2 1 =3.57; P =.06; OR 2.66, 95% CI 0.96-7.36), and a significant effect on the 12-week cessation status (Wald χ 2 1 =8.83; P =.003; OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.70-13.31).

Anti-AMA1 antibodies showed a marginally significant association with increased malaria risk: for the secondary case definition, the adjusted IRR was 1.28 (95% CI: 0.97–1.71; p = 0.06), with a similar trend for the primary case definition (IRR = 1.36; p = 0.06).

The results indicated only a marginally significant difference in the pain/discomfort score in the EOSQ-24 (p = 0.060), indicating that patients with a growth mindset scored higher in this dimension.

To assess HI effects independent of temperature modulation, a 4 (Area) × 2 (Sex) × 2 (Treatment; HI normothermic and sham) repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant Sex × Treatment interaction [ F (1,37) = 5.621, p < 0.05], as well as a marginally significant Sex effect [ F (1,37) = 3.748, p = 0.06] and Area × Sex interaction [ F (1,37) = 2.996, p = 0.09].

There was a marginally significant effect of irradiation × treatment interaction on immobility (F (1,22) = 3.81, P = 0.06).

Table S6 shows that the associations between the variables were significant (0.21 ≤ | r s| ≤ 0.90, all p s < .05), albeit SE-ST had a marginally significant ( r = 0.24, p = .06) relationship with Collectivism of Kashima and Kashima (1998) .

There was also a marginally significant interaction between age (6, 12 months) and stimulus (face, object); F (1,47) = 3.71, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.073) such that there were longer peak looks to faces than objects at 6 months but not 12 months (6 months face M 20.46, SE 2.92; object M 14.87, SE 1.78; 12 months face M 14.23, SE 1.41; object M 14.77, SE = 1.04).

before exposure to NWIs) – decreased willingness to donate in three of the seven scenarios – xenotransplant, stem cells, and evolution – and was marginally significant ( p = .06) in the bioweapons scenario.

Between-group comparisons showed that at 1 month, the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in anxiety ( P = .03) and a marginally significant improvement in depression ( P = .06) compared to the control group.

Duration of breastfeeding was no longer significant in country-constrained PERMANOVA after FDR correction; however, it was a marginally significant factor in CAR alone (FDR-adjusted p = 0.06).

Effects of TMS-induced Disruptions on Sensitivity ( d ′) In the lip experiment the effect of time on sensitivity ( d ′) was marginally significant ( F 2,34 = 3.04, P = 0.06; Table 3 , Fig. 5 A ).

Post hoc pairwise comparison performed with Holm’s sequential Bonferroni correction revealed that the ITD threshold increased when the modulation depth in one ear was reduced to 71%, and this reduction was marginally significant (t= -2.37, p= 0.06).

The minor allele of rs74163663 co-occurred with the 1858T risk allele at rs2476601 ( Table 2 ) and showed a marginally significant association with T1D ( P = 0.06) after conditioning on rs2476601.

Regressing power, ad (dummy-coded), their interaction, and age and gender on purchase intention revealed a marginally significant effect of age ( β = − .01, t (187) = − 1.92, p = .06, semipartial correlation = − .14), and more importantly, a significant interaction of power × ad ( β = .39, t (187) = 2.10, p = .04, semipartial correlation = .143; see Fig. 1 ).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant effect of small bee visitation on pollinator-perceived color (p=0.06; Table 2 ).

While the presence of adenoma or carcinoma did not seem to affect the correlation between microbial PCo1 and metabolite PC1, females showed a higher microbial PCo1-metabolite PC1 correlation than males (Spearman’s ρ = −0.772, P < 10 −19 for females; Spearman’s ρ = −0.643, P < 10 −17 for males; difference was marginally significant when tested using Fisher r -to- z transformation, P < 0.06).

Chital spatial density was marginally significant (P = 0.06) with a very weak relation with lion density, while there was no relationship with spatial density of sambar, distance to water sources, or vegetation density ( S5 Fig ).