Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
This model, F (3, 88) = 5.18, p = .002, f 2 = 0.18, resulted in a similar marginally significant nonverbal expression of shame by rurality interaction effect ( B std = 0.64, p = .06) with higher intensities of nonverbal expressions of shame at T1 predicting higher T2 suicidal ideation for rural ( B std = 0.73, p = 0.004) but not for urban ( B std = 0.09, p = 0.71) LGBTQ participants.
marginally significantp = .0601.2× alphagold
Although quite less than these studies, our model predicted only 10.7% of total intention, including the BFSN, showed the likely trait (marginally significant; p = .060; Table 3 ), so we included it in the model with further adjustment, and it was significant (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.71; Table 4 ).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Given the gender differences highlighted above in gender-stratified analyses, we also carried out interaction tests and found a marginally significant interaction for gender × Maternal AN for hyperactivity problems ( p = .06) and a significant gender × Maternal AN interaction for conduct problems ( p = .04) and emotional problems ( p = .04).
marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Overall alkaloid concentration was also higher in bee Salvia as detected by a t ‐test, indicating that concentration as well as composition contribute to this pattern ( t = 3.23, df = 5.01, P = 0.023), and marginally significant when considering all species ( t = 2.15, df = 10.14, P = 0.06).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results A Group (bilinguals, musicians, bilingual musicians, and controls) by Congruency (congruent, neutral, and incongruent) ANOVA conducted on response time data yielded a significant main effect of Congruency, F (2,430) = 453.58, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.68, a marginally significant main effect of Group, F (3,430) = 2.50, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.03, and a significant interaction between Group and Congruency, F (6,430) = 3.87, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.05.