This model, F (3, 88) = 5.18, p = .002, f 2 = 0.18, resulted in a similar marginally significant nonverbal expression of shame by rurality interaction effect ( B std = 0.64, p = .06) with higher intensities of nonverbal expressions of shame at T1 predicting higher T2 suicidal ideation for rural ( B std = 0.73, p = 0.004) but not for urban ( B std = 0.09, p = 0.71) LGBTQ participants.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The direct effect was marginally significant (estimate = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 1.91, p = 0.06, 95% CI: −0.0022, 0.1699). 3.3.
This region showed no difference over the three time points for the Low-Challenge group, whereas the High-Challenge group showed a marginally significant increase in modulation from pretest to one year, t (15) = 2.08, p = 0.06, and no difference from posttest to one year later ( p = 0.54).
The interaction between ER time windows and groups was marginally significant (F(3,75) = 2.52, p = 0.06) ( Figure 4 ).
There are marginally significant differences in the number of female flowers between the distal half (1.2 ± 1.1; mean ± SD) and the proximal half (3.3 ± 3.4; P = 0.06) of the inflorescence.
Manipulation check As Table 2 shows, for absolute change in mean values for the motive of kin care before and after the intervention, ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of the group assignment [ F (2, 966) = 11.274, p = 0.06].
We found a marginally significant difference for CFF after‐before difference between 3° and 15° eccentricities ( H 2,240 = 5.6, p = .06, post hoc: p = .056) in the rest session.
The further comparison between +R −S and –R +S remained marginally significant F (1,453) = 2.51, P = 0.06). 15.
A marginally significant increase in the frequency of the DQB1 * 0201 ( P = 0.06) and DQB1 * 0603 ( P = 0.10) alleles was found among subjects who demonstrated high IL-4 levels to MV-P.
Moreover, we found a marginally significant difference in cortisol levels between T1 and T3, t (152) = 2.84, p = 0.06, r = 0.22 with a larger effect for the humor group compared to the control one (2.0 and 0.38 respectively).
Results were marginally significant for acceptance ( F 1,93 = 2.59; p = .06; partial η 2 = .05) and non-significant for glycated hemoglobin ( F 1,93 = 0.54; p = .58; partial η 2 = .01).
There was a marginally significant Group × Cue Validity interaction for P100 latencies, F (2, 53) = 2.92, p = 0.06, η P 2 = 0.10.
When each replicate was taken separately, dogs were significantly preferred over chickens in 16 of 18 replicates (binomial test, P ≤0.001 in 13 replicates and P <0.05 in 3 replicates; one trial was marginally significant, P = 0.06, and one not significant).
The discrepancy between the direct and indirect estimate was marginally significant (I 2 =71%, P=0.06).
Although quite less than these studies, our model predicted only 10.7% of total intention, including the BFSN, showed the likely trait (marginally significant; p = .060; Table 3 ), so we included it in the model with further adjustment, and it was significant (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.71; Table 4 ).
Given the gender differences highlighted above in gender-stratified analyses, we also carried out interaction tests and found a marginally significant interaction for gender × Maternal AN for hyperactivity problems ( p = .06) and a significant gender × Maternal AN interaction for conduct problems ( p = .04) and emotional problems ( p = .04).
The Distributive Justice × Procedural Justice interaction was marginally significant on voluntary tax compliance ( p = 0.06).
Salamander Group had a marginally significant effect on salamander T b ( P = 0.06), possibly because the minimum gradient temperature tended to be slightly colder through the season ( Fig.
Overall alkaloid concentration was also higher in bee Salvia as detected by a t ‐test, indicating that concentration as well as composition contribute to this pattern ( t = 3.23, df = 5.01, P = 0.023), and marginally significant when considering all species ( t = 2.15, df = 10.14, P = 0.06).
The test for interaction between treatment and HLA-A*02 status was marginally significant ( P = .06).
There were marginally significant gene-nutrient interactions between αENaC A663T genotypes and available zinc intake in women ( p = 0.06; Figure 2 ). 4.
In contrast, Shannon index demonstrated marginally significant variation among gradients ( χ 2 = 7.52, df = 3, P = 0.06), from 0.148 in the A gradient to 0.400 in the K gradient.
Results A Group (bilinguals, musicians, bilingual musicians, and controls) by Congruency (congruent, neutral, and incongruent) ANOVA conducted on response time data yielded a significant main effect of Congruency, F (2,430) = 453.58, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.68, a marginally significant main effect of Group, F (3,430) = 2.50, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.03, and a significant interaction between Group and Congruency, F (6,430) = 3.87, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.05.
Marginally significant increases (tendency) ( p = 0.060) were observed for task-approach goals.
Concern about infections and awareness of bacterial accumulation did not differ significantly among education groups, despite a marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.060) between cleaning frequency and education levels.