We found marginally significant longitudinal effects of noise on behavioral health ( p = 0.06) as measured by strain and sleep.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Meanwhile, among patients without adjuvant CTx, the presence of ENE was significantly associated with poor OS (P=0.004) ( Figure 3C ), and the RFS had a marginally significant difference (P=0.06) ( Figure 3D ).
Of those, only Words ISO (OR = 2.20) was marginally significant ( p ≈ 0.06); all other effects were not significant, p 's > 0.10.
bilingual) as between-subject factors revealed that the effect of stimulus type was marginally significant [ F (1,112) = 3.71, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.09].
A significant difference in hydration increment was noted between both groups at Week 4, with the CPM‐HA20G treated side demonstrating an average hydration increment of 12.3% (95% CI 1.3–23.2, p = 0.029); there was also a marginally significant difference between the two groups at week 32, where the average hydration increment of the CPM‐HA20G treated side was 10.7% (95% CI −0.4 to 21.8, p = 0.06) higher than that of the CPM‐HA20 treated side, as shown in Figure 4 . 3.4.
Also, miR-1207-3p expression had a marginally significant impact on PCa survival (HR = 1.8 P = .06) ( Table 3 , Figure 1 , Figure 2 ).
The interaction between group and rating type may be more pronounced among conservative participants; the three-way interaction involving political ideology, rating type, and group was marginally significant ( B = −.41, SE = 0.22, p = .06).
α- and β-Diversity in Each Obesity Phenotype Healthy individuals had higher microbial α-diversity based on the Shannon index compared to the MHO and MUO phenotypes, and the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 ).
lobata , a higher symbiont density on day 2 was associated with lower parasitism, or an increase in proportional carbon translocation in heat-treated corals on day 17, and this relationship remained marginally significant even after applying a multiple test correction ( R 2 = 0.89, P = 0.06, Fig. 3C ).
follow-up, t (9) = 2.355, p < 0.05, d = 0.78 (see Table 3 ).There was a marginally significant main effect of Session for coefficient of variation of SART response times at baseline vs. follow-up, F (1,15) = 4.279, p < .06, η p 2 = 0.222 , that was accounted for by the GMT group, t (9) = 2.410, p < 0.04, d = 0.993 (see Table 3 ; Figure 1 , top right).
Spatial ROIs We found a marginally significant interaction in a cluster in right PSPL/Pr, (peak coordinate: x = 20, y = -66, z = 54, BA = 7, z = 2.52, p = 0.06, k = 83 voxels; Figure 4A ) 7 .
In addition, the interaction between priming type and experiments reached significance, F (1,96) = 5.72, MSE = 20401, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.06, and the three-way interaction was marginally significant, F (3,96) = 2.53, MSE = 9013, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.07, whereas other interactions were missing [Experiment ∗ SOAs: F < 1, ns; Congruency ∗ SOAs: F (3,96) = 1.41, MSE = 12277, p > 0.10].
The passage time of seeds through the gut and the germination percentage were marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.71, F = 7.69, p = 0.06).
There was a marginally significant main effect for situation, F (1,94) = 3.636, p = .06, η 2 = .037 . .
There was a marginally significant effect on egoistic motives (b = 0.23, SE = 0.12, p = 0.06).
There was some evidence that grazer utilization may increase the percentage bare ground in tufted attractor‐dominated sites: the best model included only a positive and marginally significant effect of dung abundance on percentage bare ground ( F 1,13 = 4.312, p = .06; Figure 5 ; Table S7 ); however, the simpler intercept only model received similar support (ΔAICc = 1.115). 4.
High DBP seems to reduce the CV hazard to 0.61 (marginally significant effect at P =0.06).
The odor of the caterpillars and their frass was attractive for naïve caterpillars in comparison to clean air ( N = 30, χ 2 = 8.53, P = 0.003), and attraction was marginally significant in the case of experienced caterpillars ( N = 23, χ 2 = 3.52, P = 0.060).
A marginally significant interaction for Sex and MPS was found, F (1,58) = 3.71, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.06.
The difference for blood pressure was marginally significant (p = 0.06).
Subsequently, we found positive correlations between ICD and apoptosis (PCC = 0.55, β = 0.43, p = 0.03), ICD and necroptosis (PCC = 0.74, β = 0.78, p = 0.002), and apoptosis and necroptosis (PCC = 0.83, β = 1.11, p = 0.0001) within the ARVC myocardium, whereas the correlation between ICD and pyroptosis was marginally significant (PCC = 0.49, β = 0.86, p = 0.06) ( Supplementary Figure S2 ). 3.3.
Correlations Between Disease Activity, Medications, and Markers of Intestinal Permeability Serum zonulin did not correlate with FCP, PMS, or IBD-related medications ( Supplementary Table S1 ), whereas there was a positive correlation between LBP and PMS (r = 0.40, p = 0.03), intake of antibiotics (r = 0.52, p = 0.00), anti-TNF medications (r = 0.42, p = 0.02), and a marginally significant trend for FCP (r = 0.31, p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 B). 5.
In addition, there was a marginally significant increase in anxiety from pre- to post-testing, F = 3.46, p = 0.06, partial eta squared = 0.02.
Antibody Concentration and Time to Infection Among cases, there was a low negative correlation between pre-F IgG concentration in breast milk at 1 month postpartum and time to RSV ARI in cases, which is marginally significant (ρ = –0.22; P = .06), indicating that higher antibody levels may be associated with shorter time to infection.
A marginally significant main effect of task type was also observed [ F (1,20) = 3.74, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.16], with post-hoc multiple comparisons revealing that the non-semantic condition was marginally significantly more negative than the semantic condition ( p = 0.06).