“marginally significant”

We observed a marginally significant interaction between the two variables ( F (1,46) = 3.737, p = 0.059), indicating a tendency for L2 listeners to have weaker sentence-level tracking than L1 listeners in the active condition ( p = 0.004) but not the passive condition ( p = 0.138).

In the predining state ( Figures 10A – C ), for the item “I am extremely hungry right now” ( Figure 10A ), an ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of music type ( F (2, 845) = 2.85, p = 0.059), and a marginal significance of the Time × Music interaction ( F (4, 1,690) = 2.04, p = 0.086).

The inverted image yielded marginally significant differences in change ratios ( F (2,26) = 3.165, p = .059, η 2 = 0.196)(see Fig. 2 , bottom row).

For School 1 which sees a marginally significant inequality effect in the mock exams (−6.889 points, P = 0.059), the inequality effect for Gaokao is also significant and of similar magnitude (−8.440 points, P = 0.015).

Pairwise comparisons of the two learning rates in each subgroup showed a significant difference between the two in the “Learning Charity” subgroup (t 6 = 8.53, p<0.0001) with greater learning rate for self than charity and a marginally significant difference between the two in the “Learning Self” subgroup (t 11 = −2.104, p = 0.059) with greater learning rate for charity than self.

For valence ratings, we found a significant main effect of stimulus, F (1, 24) = 13.49, p = 0.001, η 2 p = 0.360, as well as a marginally significant interaction of Phase × Stimulus, F (1, 24) = 3.92, p = 0.059, η 2 p = 0.140.

The microwave irradiation with the CNT absorber was marginally significant ( P = 0.059) in reducing the presence of X . fastidiosa when compared to the control group (dH 2 O treatment without microwave).

MDF results The MDF euthanasia values of the osteotomized femur compared to the control femur are statistically significantly higher for all groups, i.e., sixth week (P < 0.001), eighth week (P < 0.001), 10th week (P = 0.026), and marginally significant at the 12th week (P = 0.059).

For EI, a marginally significant difference between sexes was found on emotion management, F (1, 177) = 3.63, p = 0.059, η 2 = 0.020.

Compared with leptospirosis patients, a marginally significant longer LOS was found in COVID-19 patients ((12.35 ± 4.94) days vs (10.26 ± 4.10) days, p = 0.059; Table 2 ).

A significant two-way interaction between group and hemisphere was also observed [ F (2,36) = 3.36, p = 0.046, η p 2 = 0.16], indicating that both the low-arousal music [ F (1,36) = 6.82, p = 0.013, η p 2 = 0.16] and high-arousal music groups [ F (1,36) = 29.18, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.45] exhibited stronger neural responses in the left than right hemisphere, while the silence group showed a marginally significant difference in neural responses between the left and right hemispheres [ F (1,36) = 3.80, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.10].

S1b), and there was a marginally significant negative relationship between soil organic carbon and herbivore nematodes ( R = − 0.67, p = 0.059, Fig.

Moreover, the effect of the Pet-related Avoidance Scale was marginally significant [ F ( 1 , 432 ) = 3.597, p = 0.059]; dogs of owners with elevated PAVS tended to approach the toy object later, and there was a significant PAVS × PANXS interaction [ F ( 1 , 432 ) = 5.568, p = 0.019; dogs of owners with lower PAVS and PANXS tended to approach the toy object sooner].

The results of analysing the accuracy rates showed that: (1) the main effect of cognitive effort-avoidance was significant, F (1,16) = 5.758, P = 0.029, η 2 = 0.265; and (2) the interaction effect between patient condition and cognitive effort-avoidance was marginally significant, F (1,16) = 4.120, P = 0.059, η 2 = 0.205.

However, there was a statistically significant indirect effect such that individuals with ambivalent encounters reported higher levels of daily stress, which was, in turn, associated with greater SCD relative to 5 years ago ( b = 6.210, p < .05), and there was a marginally significant indirect path from neutral encounters to SCD through daily stress ( b = 3.533, p = .059).

A marginally significant trend was also observed for TNK (RR 1.10 95% CI 1.0–1.21, p = 0.059) (Fig.

This interaction was marginally significant in ANG with respect to associative retrieval (χ 2 (1) = 3.57, p = 0.059), but not decision RT (χ 2 (1) = 0.16, p = 0.685).

A marginally significant reduction was observed in the mRNA expression of CB1 ( p = 0.059).

∆ α demonstrated excellent variance homogeneity ( p = 0.9258) with marginally significant group differences ( p = 0.0591).

Comparison of the distribution of single versus multiple HCMV genotypes between distinct clinical specimens showed a marginally significant difference (χ 2 = 15; p = 0.0592).

There was a marginally significant difference in the prognosis between patients with scores of 1 and 2 (p = 0.0592, Log rank test).

However, the marginally significant p -value ( p = 0.0593) of the ARB/AML interaction term could indicate a negative interaction, implying that the effect of the combination drug was less than the sum of the component effects.

The organic matter percentage showed marginally significant differences ( F = 3.7418; p = 0.0594; Fig. 5 ) for the LUI being controlled by the volume and age.

When we performed the PCA analysis separately for the two periods, we still observed a significant divergence among tissues during development (⍴=0.95, p=0.0008) and observed a marginally significant convergence during ageing (⍴=-0.64, p=0.0596).

The dry mass per receptacle decreased with segment age; the decrease being significant in Kronprinsen and Hirsholmene and marginally significant in Kobbefjord and Qeqertarsuaq (Kobbefjord: p = 0.0596; Qeqertarsuaq: p = 0.0536; Appendix S1 : Table S3 ) (Figure 5 ).