“marginally significant”

We found DAE across all samples to be marginally significant (p = 0.059) with higher expression of allele A; the one sample t -test method showed p = 0.001.

The differences in the proportion of the distribution of these behavioral modification stages between the control and intervention groups were significant at 3 months ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.059).

A potential mechanism for these associations is suggested by the marginally significant ( p = 0.059) finding of increased levels of CRP, a marker of systemic chronic inflammation, associated with RT.

Further, in Organic Evolution, those with preinstruction content knowledge score at or below the class median had a significantly higher increase in their BAS Part A score ( p = 0.0360) and a marginally significant higher increase in their BAS Part B ( p = 0.059), on average, than those scoring above the median.

A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis indicated an apparently favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in the LND group, compared to the LNS group, and this difference was marginally significant (P = 0.059).

After adjusting for confounding factors, time × group interaction became significant for total n -6 PUFA (p = 0.026) and marginally significant for C15:0 (p = 0.059) and C16:0 (p = 0.056), and became non-significant for C17:1 (p = 0.162) and C18:3n-3 (p = 0.105).

There was a marginally significant trend for the independent effect of neighborhood disadvantage on PHQOL within African American cancer survivors (P=0.059) but not White cancer survivors (P=0.1642).

The results of analysing the accuracy rates showed that: (1) the main effect of cognitive effort-avoidance was significant, F (1,16) = 5.758, P = 0.029, η 2 = 0.265; and (2) the interaction effect between patient condition and cognitive effort-avoidance was marginally significant, F (1,16) = 4.120, P = 0.059, η 2 = 0.205.

In the sensitivity analysis ( Supplemental material Table S1 ), adjusting for the same variables except baseline hemoglobin, the direction of the effect remained the same but was marginally significant (β = −1.61; 95% CI: −3.27 to −0.06; p = 0.059).

In the predining state ( Figures 10A – C ), for the item “I am extremely hungry right now” ( Figure 10A ), an ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of music type ( F (2, 845) = 2.85, p = 0.059), and a marginal significance of the Time × Music interaction ( F (4, 1,690) = 2.04, p = 0.086).

A marginally significant difference was also observed between adolescents living with other guardians and those living with both parents (p = 0.059).

There was no significant difference in the slope between AM and ECM species ( P = 0.97), whereas the difference in the intercept was marginally significant ( P = 0.059) with the common slope; AM species had consistently lower LN than ECM species at a given SLA.

The results showed a significant main effect of noise level ( F (1, 8) = 50.793, p < 0.001) and spatial frequency ( F (9, 72) = 94.486, p < 0.001) but only a marginally significant main effect of deprivation stage ( F (1, 8) = 4.858, p = 0.059).

For AZD0530 (also known as saracatinib, a Src and Abl inhibitor), we found a previously reported gene set for SRC signaling 22 , which consisted of eight genes, was significantly associated with the drug in CCLE ( P = 3.89 × 10 −4 , NES = 1.91) and marginally significant by the GDSC model ( P = 0.059, NES = 1.48).

The continuous variable NFA showed a marginally significant interaction with warmth, F (1, 179) = 3.62, p = .059, η 2 p = .02: Participants higher in NFA (+1 SD ) tended to have a stronger preference for stereotypically warm groups over stereotypically cold groups, M diff = 15.81, SE = 1.61, 95% CI [12.64, 18.98], F (1, 179) = 96.95, p < .001, η 2 p = .35, than participants lower in NFA (−1 SD ), M diff = 11.45, SE = 1.61, 95% CI [8.28, 14.61], F (1, 179) = 50.80, p < .001, η 2 p = .22.

In the short run, the effects are more limited: the first-differenced health expenditure coefficient is negative but not statistically significant ( p = 0.231), whereas the first-differenced migration coefficient is positive and marginally significant ( p = 0.059).

On the other hand, participants who followed the relaxation instructions with the instrumental meditation music reported a marginally significant decrease in alertness ( p = .059, Bonferroni-corrected), whereas the opposite was observed for participants who followed the relaxation instructions with the drumming sequence ( p = .054, Bonferroni-corrected).

The PP results were in line with the LMM approach, yielding a Time (T1 and T2)×Group (AB versus BA) interaction that was significant for the Communication index [ F (1,41) = 5.75, P = 0.021, η p 2 = 0.123] and marginally significant for the Responsive speech index [ F (1,44) = 3.76, P = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.079].

Additionally, there was a marginally significant congruency × experiment effect ( F ( 1 , 82 ) = 3.65 , p = 0.059 , η p 2 = 0.04 ), which indicated a marginally weaker congruency effect in Experiment 1 compared to Experiment 2 .

There was a marginally significant additive effect for the CG haplotype which reduced the expected number of malaria episodes (RR = 0.969, 95%CI: 0.939–1.001, P = 0.059).

A higher chronicity index in patients with relapsed LN was marginally significant (p=0.059), as shown in Supplementary Table 2 .

Pain catastrophizing was positively associated with caregiver burden (β = .339, p < .01) and negatively associated with education (β = −.382, p < .01) and resilience (β = −.192, p < .059, marginally significant).

The increase in bladder volume at the first desire to void was marginally significant (from 106.3 to 140.5, P=0.059) and the increase in bladder capacity was not statistically significant (P=0.11).

Among the various clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological features that were evaluated, mixed histology (tumors consisting of 10%-90% of signet ring cells) had a marginally significant association ( P = 0.059) with the risk of LNM.

We then tested our second hypotheses on the moderating effects of caregivers’ perspective taking and observed three effects on the association between receiving emotional support and PLWD’s hair cortisol ( β = 0.56, p = .003), the association between receiving practical support and PLWD’s hair cortisol ( β = −0.39, p = .013), and the association between receiving emotional support and PLWD’s DHEA-to-cortisol ratio ( β = −0.41, p = .059; marginally significant).