While SC had a marginally significant effect on SCULT (H4: β = 0.111, t = 1.891, p = 0.059), its direct relationships with SK (H5: β = 0.053, t = 0.810, p = 0.418) and SP (H6: β = 0.096, t = 1.468, p = 0.142) were statistically nonsignificant.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Interactions The interaction analysis identified a marginally significant differential effect for personnel by presence of CBT ( β = −0.75, p = 0.059).
Male students skipping dinner ≥ occasionally were likely to have a higher cumulative probability of weight gain than those eating dinner every day, although the difference between these groups was at a marginally significant level ( p = 0.059) ( Figure 2 a).
From all the cardiometabolic parameters analyzed in this study, there was only a marginally significant ( p = 0.059) increase in MMP-9 for Group A after 8-months intervention and a non-significant ( p = 0.089) trend, in the same sense, for Group A+X.
There was also a marginally significant interaction between devaluation X group X context (F 1,22 = 3.97, p = 0.059).
There was also a marginally significant effect on empathy [ t (14) = 1.89, p = 0.059, ES = 0.145], but object-related absorption did not reach a significant level [ t (14) = 0.84, p = 0.403, ES = 0.061].
When classification task and action jointly switched, the associated full switch costs remained constant across immediate and remote tests in the wake group ( b = −10.58, t = −1.06, P = 0.288), whereas a marginally significant decrease was seen after sleep ( b = −18.93, t = −1.89, P = 0.059) ( Fig. 2 C).
When we assessed the interaction between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and being a healthcare professional, we found only a marginally significant p for interaction ( p = 0.059) for test-diagnosed COVID-19 infection.
This interaction effect was more obvious in group extraction ( figure 2 a ; electronic supplementary material, table S1, p = 0.012) and marginally significant in individual extraction ( figure 2 b ; electronic supplementary material, table S2, p = 0.059).
However, the sense of presence was marginally significant in Model 2, β = 0.27, t = 1.95, p = 0.059.
A significant two-way interaction between group and hemisphere was also observed [ F (2,36) = 3.36, p = 0.046, η p 2 = 0.16], indicating that both the low-arousal music [ F (1,36) = 6.82, p = 0.013, η p 2 = 0.16] and high-arousal music groups [ F (1,36) = 29.18, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.45] exhibited stronger neural responses in the left than right hemisphere, while the silence group showed a marginally significant difference in neural responses between the left and right hemispheres [ F (1,36) = 3.80, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.10].
In SNU-EP1 cells, there was significant increase of early apoptosis ( P = .0468; unpaired t test) and marginally significant increase of late apoptotic cells ( P = .0590; unpaired t test) after WP1066 treatment.
This decrease in CSK expression was statistically significant in all the cases (p < 0.05), except for individuals who carried CSK rs34933034 risk allele A, that showed a marginally significant decrease (p = 0.059).
Sex of the host influenced transmission in both cases, but conversely: females were associated with a higher probability of infection in birds (OR: 3.98 [95% CI: 1.48–10.72]), whereas in mice, males were more likely to transmit infection (marginally significant association, p = 0.059, OR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.09–1.93]) than females.
We also observed a significant 3-way interaction between target category, hemisphere, and age group ( F (2,46) = 3.54, p = 0.037) and a marginally significant 3-way interaction between category, MI level, and age group ( F (4,92) = 2.36, p = 0.059).
We also found a marginally significant interaction effect between solution type and region, F (2, 48) = 3.410, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.124, and a significant interaction effect between region and laterality, F (2, 48) = 7.785, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.245.
The left hand side of the table reveals that DRD2 has a marginally significant effect on conduct disorder ( b = .141, p = .059), whereas DRD4 does not exert an independent effect on the wave 1 conduct disorder scale ( b = .036, p = .656).
We summarize the results below: Regarding the individual-level prediction on the SCZ dataset, we found a marginally significant positive correlation between the predicted working memory and the digit-sequencing score ( r = 0.21, P = 0.059), but partial correlation analysis did not show a significant correlation ( rho = 0.10, P = 0.26) while factoring out the BACS composite score and age.
Feeling incomplete evacuation and time in lavatory per attempt (Completeness and Time variables) may be considered as marginally significant (p= 0.059).
The increase in bladder volume at the first desire to void was marginally significant (from 106.3 to 140.5, P=0.059) and the increase in bladder capacity was not statistically significant (P=0.11).
The difference in life satisfaction in the past between the two groups was marginally significant ( t = 1.90; p = 0.059).
A similar (but marginally significant, p = 0.059) activity relationship occurred for summer but not spring ( Figure 3 c,d).
The main effect of hemisphere was marginally significant, F (1, 116) = 3.65, p = .059, η p 2 = .031, 95% CI [-.032,.093], with a trend towards faster response times in the right hemisphere ( M = 737, SD = 112) than the left ( M = 748, SD = 117).
5 B middle), although anger was marginally significant in the same condition (r = 0.42, P = 0.059; Fig. 5 B right).
At one year more SCS patients were in CCS class 1 or 2 (Table 2 ) and the difference was marginally significant at the traditional level (p = 0.059).