“marginally significant”

The effect of higher recipient FOXP3 mRNA expression was significant in rabbit‐ATG recipients ( p = 0.036) and marginally significant in horse‐ATG recipients ( p = 0.059).

3.4 Impacts of EFN secretion on plant fitness Clogging had a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.059) on fruit abortion, increasing by 12% the probability of abortion in flowers associated with leaves in which EFN had been clogged (Figure 4 a, Table 1 ).

For correct rejections, there was a marginally significant effect of Applicant Age [F (2,70) = 2.95, p = .059, η p 2 = .078], with planned comparisons confirming that participants made fewer correct rejections for adolescent compared to child [t (35) = 3.25, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.39] and adult applicants [t (35) = 3.96, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.37] but no difference between for child and adult applicants [t (35) = 0.71, p > 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.06].

The interaction of change type and cue type was marginally significant [ F (1, 12) = 4.33, p = .059].

A similar (but marginally significant, p = 0.059) activity relationship occurred for summer but not spring ( Figure 3 c,d).

Also only among men, reflection directly and positively predicted integrative self-knowledge (β = .17, p < .001); the difference between regression coefficients in men and women was marginally significant ( t = 1.89, p = .059).

We found a significant difference between the conditions at 83%, t (22) = 2.319, p < 0.05, and a marginally significant difference at 17%, t (22) = −2.01, p = 0.059 (Figure 2 ), although none of the tests survived Bonferroni correction.

A marginally significant correlation was observed between the first principal coordinate of functional SNVs and microbiome PC1 ( Figure 2(c ), R = 0.37, P = .059).

For former smokers, the OR difference of the different NDVI groups was marginally significant ( P = 0.059).

The interaction was not observed with the SL measure of SVO ( F (1,404) = 0.83, p = .364), but was marginally significant when the participants were categorized to proselfs and prosocials [ 22 ] ( F (1,404) = 3.60, p = .059).

MDF results The MDF euthanasia values of the osteotomized femur compared to the control femur are statistically significantly higher for all groups, i.e., sixth week (P < 0.001), eighth week (P < 0.001), 10th week (P = 0.026), and marginally significant at the 12th week (P = 0.059).

A repeated measures ANOVA confirmed these impressions as a significant effect of blood glucose evaluation day was found [ F (2,12) = 73.46, p < 0.000] and a marginally significant group effect [ F (1,6) = 5.40, p < 0.059], but no interaction [ F (2,12) = 2.21, p = 0.15].

This decrease was only statistically significant in exon 4 (χ 2 = 12, P = 0.001) and marginally significant in intron 2a (χ 2 = 3.556, P = 0.059), whereas it was non-significant in exon 2 (χ 2 = 1.815, P = 0.178).

A three‐way interaction between target type, target modality, and group was also marginally significant ( F (1, 97) = 0.344, p = .059), so we further separately conducted a subsequent ANOVA analysis for both non‐SCD and SCD older adults.

There was no difference in transformation frequency between isolates with pherotype 1 or non-pherotype 1 alleles (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.384); this difference becomes marginally significant if strains lacking any detectable transformation are excluded from this analysis (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.059).

The odds of using antipsychotic during a self-harm act increased marginally significant when females used no alcohol during the self-harm act (OR = 0.823, p = .059) and when there was a history of self-harm episodes (OR = 2.409, p < .001).

The differences in the proportion of the distribution of these behavioral modification stages between the control and intervention groups were significant at 3 months ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.059).

There was a marginally significant correlation between the blood Hg level and the WAZ-BWZ among 109 infants (r = −0.182, p = 0.059; Supplementary Figure S1 ).

The continuous variable NFA showed a marginally significant interaction with warmth, F (1, 179) = 3.62, p = .059, η 2 p = .02: Participants higher in NFA (+1 SD ) tended to have a stronger preference for stereotypically warm groups over stereotypically cold groups, M diff = 15.81, SE = 1.61, 95% CI [12.64, 18.98], F (1, 179) = 96.95, p < .001, η 2 p = .35, than participants lower in NFA (−1 SD ), M diff = 11.45, SE = 1.61, 95% CI [8.28, 14.61], F (1, 179) = 50.80, p < .001, η 2 p = .22.

The correlation coefficient between ξ1 and ξ2 was weak but significant ( r = 0.47, P = 0.05) for the normalized measures and marginally significant ( r = 0.45, P = 0.059) for the original ones.

Repeated measures ANOVA for Global Cognition revealed a marginally significant main effect of Time (F = 3.719, df = 1,54, p = .059) and a trend-level Treatment Group x Time interaction (F = 2.960, df = 1,54, p = .091) with small effect size ( d = 0.25).

The main effect of Dose was marginally significant [ F (2, 14) = 3.54, p = 0.059].

However, TNFAIP8 shows a marginally significant difference (P = 0.059), implying that higher WBC counts might be associated with elevated TNFAIP8 expression, though the other members do not display such associations.

They found that treatment with nesiritide was associated with a 74% increased risk of death within 30 days, though this increase was marginally significant (p = 0.059).

After adjusting for confounding factors, time × group interaction became significant for total n -6 PUFA (p = 0.026) and marginally significant for C15:0 (p = 0.059) and C16:0 (p = 0.056), and became non-significant for C17:1 (p = 0.162) and C18:3n-3 (p = 0.105).