“marginally significant”

Only Enabling factors as a group (income, social support, neighborhood safety and competing needs) offered marginally significant predictive power ( p = 0.058).

There was only a marginally significant difference between taxonomic mismatch and match (p = .058) in the left fronto-central region.

In detail, the alteration of HRAS mutation, although marginally significant (p=0.058), was more frequent in the invasive UTUC cases than in the noninvasive UTUC cases.

Soil porosity A marginally significant third-order interaction between species, compaction and time was observed in relation to soil porosity (measured at a scale of 60 μm) (p = 0.058, n = 56; Fig 9 ).

4 D ) did not show any changes across conditions, but ripples showed marginally significant higher coupling with PPC than PFC spindles (rmANOVA brain area P = 0.058, F 1,2 = 15.7).

The main effect of emotion conditions was marginally significant [ F (1.407, 21.100) = 3.616, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.194], but the main effect of time points and the interaction were all not significant.

Post Assessments The ANOVA revealed significant main effects for Moments for RMSSD (F 1, 20 = 5.77; p = 0.026, η p 2 = 0.22; op = 0.63) and SD1 (F 1, 20 = 5.78; p = 0.026, η p 2 = 0.22; op = 0.63), and a marginally significant effect, but with a large effect size for Mean RR (F 1, 20 = 4.06; p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.17; op = 0.48), which shows an increase in RMSSD and SD1 at rest from pre (34.9 ms and 24.7, respectively) to post intervention (47.5 ms and 33.6) in both sequences. 3.3.

At a concentration of 40 μM of compound 121 (comparable to 500 μg/mL of the extract), there was only a marginally significant inhibition of NO production (20%, P = 0.058). 86 This study explored the effect of multiple doses of the extract and isolated 121 on NO levels in an inflammatory model; however, the study was only conducted at the in vitro level.

Decision times The main effect of fairness was marginally significant, F (1, 30) = 3.90, P = .058, η p 2 = 0.12 (see Fig. 2 ), indicating that participants completed decisions more quickly for fair offers (588.85 ± 139.46 ms) than unfair (609.01 ± 135.79 ms).

A marginally significant effect of measurement ( F (1,31) = 3.864, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.111) was detected that might be the result of continued task practice. 3-Back Task Further, a 3-back task was administered to assess the persistence of WM modulations from before to after stimulation (Figure 4B ).

Moreover, linear regression analysis indicates that the decrease in CD63 intensity is marginally significant for both systems ( p = 0.058 for ON-Chip and p = 0.10 for OFF-Chip).

Group I patients showed better final hearing levels compared with group II patients (42.00±22.35 dB and 57.38±26.40 dB, respectively), although this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.058).

A marginally significant result was observed between II1 and II2 (MD = −33.69%, p = 0.058).

Groups were fairly similar according to clinical characteristics, except death, which was marginally significant (NF1‐associated MPNSTs [100%], sporadic MPNST [71%]; P = 0.058). 3.1.

Most species contributed to a differentiation of the community composition with the intensification gradient, but only Vallonia costata showed a marginally significant univariate positive response ( P = 0.058; Additional file 5 : Appendix S5).

Pre-training CDT scores predicted training clusters [ β = 0.283 , S D = 0.096 , Z = 2.940 , p < 0.01 ] and a marginally significant relation emerged between training performance (cluster) and anxiety improvement β = 0.157 , S D = 0.083 , Z = 1.893 , p = 0.058 .

The regression model explained 14.0% of the variance in this criterion variable, which was marginally significant [ F (3, 49) = 2.668, p = 0.058].

Moreover, SON also increased the number of open quarter visits as a marginally significant effect of treatments was found (H = 7.493, df = 3, p = 0.058).

Non-normalized levels of NPPB exhibited a marginally significant difference between failed and non-failed samples (p = 0.058).

Not only was this pattern identified when all FC edges were examined, but, suggestively, it was also identified for the subset of edges comprising higher-order RSN nodes (the binomial test results are marginally significant, however; p = 0.058).

It had a marginally significant positive effect among centrists compared to the Control condition at T2 (estimate = 0.45, SE = 0.19, t (362) = 2.35, p = 0.058, d = 0.37, 95% CI [0.06, 0.68]), no significant effect among leftists (estimate = 0.05, SE = 0.16, t (479) = 0.30, p = 0.762, d = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.21, 0.29]), and a non-significant negative effect among rightists (estimate = −0.12, SE = 0.23, t (358) = −0.55, p = 0.874, d = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.39, 0.22]).

These differences were statistically significant in 2020 and marginally significant in 2018 ( p < 0.058) and 2022 ( p < 0.059) (Table 2 ).

Differences in the distribution of male and female partners across relationship type were marginally significant [ χ 2 (1) = 3.59; p = 0.058], with a greater proportion of female partners (28%) being primary partners compared to male partners (21%), while a greater proportion of male partners (79%) were casual partners compared to female partners (72%).

Similarly, in the visual recognition task of the WMS, with a Linear Mixed Model with clinical diagnosis as the factor and age as the covariate, we found that the patients had a marginally worse performance than the control group [ F (1, 58) = 3.77, p = 0.057], and age was also marginally significant [ F (58) = 3.75, p = 0.058; Figure 3B ].

Furthermore, we obtained a marginally significant three-way interaction of the factors reward, CTI, and SOA, F (2, 48) = 3.03, p = 0.058, η G 2 = 0.003.