“marginally significant”

Post hoc Dunnett tests comparing the experimental group with the control groups indicated significantly lower itch NRS scores in the positive expectation induction group ( M = 5.7, SD = 0.3) than in the negative expectation induction group ( M = 6.8, SD = 0.3) ( p <0.01) and marginally significant itch NRS scores in the positive expectation induction group than in the extinction group ( M = 6.5, SD = 0.3) ( p = 0.058).

In general, the differences between MS patients and controls still remained significant, with the exception of PASAT 2′′, where the effect of depression (although marginally significant; F(1,89) = 3.69, p = 0.058) tempered down the difference between the two groups (see Table 4 in the Supplementary Material available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7404289 ).

Furthermore, each 1-SD increase in ALP level was associated with 11%, 20% and 10% higher risk of CHD, stroke and CVD events in the fully adjusted model, respectively, with the risk calculated for stroke being marginally significant (HRs (95% CI), 1.20 (0.97 to 1.49), p=0.058).

For the deltamethrin-treated LLINs, the rate was one third that of the control, 15.1 vs 49.5, respectively, with a marginally significant difference (z = -2.34, p = 0.058) and a reduction percentage of 69.5%.

Interestingly, when these variables were included in the multivariable logistic regression model only age remained positively associated with help received (psychological distress was marginally significant p = 0.058).

This trend continued in 2018 with the Reference group scoring lower than the Dance group, although this difference was marginally significant (β = −0.2415, p = 0.058).

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc analysis on the interaction effect revealed a significant difference (p = .03) between CS+ 1ws (mean = 523.77 ms; sd = 149.42 ms) and CS+ 2ws (mean = 540.63 ms; sd = 161.03 ms) in the second hemiblock; a marginally significant effect emerged also for the first hemiblock (p = .058), with CS+ 1ws (mean = 517.36 ms; sd = 142.10 ms) presenting slightly faster reaction times than CS+ 2ws (mean = 527.55 ms; sd = 147.02 ms).

The correlation between SD and RA was marginally significant ( r = 0.09, p = 0.058). 3.2.

For hormone-related cancers, birth order and age at menarche had the most influence on this relation, while maternal proteinuria, birth order and own parity had the most effect on non-hormonal cancer risk. Birth length and cancer risk Univariate analysis A positive and statistically significant trend was found between birth length and all cancers combined (P = 0.007), and non- hormonal cancers (P = 0.011), while a marginally significant trend was found for combined hormone-related cancers and colon cancer (P = 0.058), adjusted for gestational age.

Changes in GIP AUC did not differ among groups ( P = 0.76); however, there was a marginally significant 7% decrease ( P = 0.058) with all groups combined.

After adjusting for sociodemographic variables (sex, age, race and ethnicity, educational level, and marital status), physical activity, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, hypertension, CKD, BMI, and HbA1c in model 3, the association between Klotho and KS was marginally significant (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.57–1.01; p = 0.058).

There was, however, a marginally significant main effect of Age Group for the subjective importance of observing the recommendations regarding hand-washing, F (2, 281) = 2.88, p = .058, η p 2 = .020, with the OA group perceiving the observation of these recommendations as significantly more important than the YA group ( p = .025) and the MA group ( p = .032).

Age was marginally significant (OR=2.172, CI, 0.975–4.839, p =0.058).

The two-way interaction between group and animacy was marginally significant (F(1, 22) = 4.142; p = 0.058; η 2 = 0.02).

The results from the 2 (group)*2 (phase) ANOVA for neutral primes indicated a marginally significant effect of phase (F(1,63) = 3.714, p = 0.058).

The difference in the pattern of ERβ expression in males and females were marginally significant ( P =0.058) and women showed more cases of strong expression compared to men.

It yielded a significant main effect of time point [ F (1,19) = 6.87; p = 0.017] and a marginally significant main effect of synchronicity [ F (1,19) = 4.08; p = 0.058], indicating that the proprioceptive drift toward the RH tended to be larger in the condition with synchronous stroking.

A marginally significant three-way interaction ( p = .058) was observed, suggesting a potential trend where the combined effect of immigration importance and negative arousal on PVV attitudes was most pronounced in the blame condition.

The results showed that the effects of NS were marginally significant on positive affective variation ( F = 3.88, p = 0.058), and the main effects of CL on positive affective variation were not significant ( F = 0.18, p = 0.677), but the interaction effects of CL and navigational structure on positive affective variation were significant ( F = 13.66, p < 0.001), which indicated that only when the two independent variables worked together will they significantly influence affective experience.

The model with the best fit for the outcome variable mean pitch only retained a marginally significant main effect of focus (β = −3.467, SE = 1.822, t = −1.903, p = 0.058).

Although this association was marginally significant in the crude model ( P = 0.058), adjustment for potential confounders strengthened the associations ( P = 0.022).

Furthermore, as expected, the males we studied showed higher mean social ADI-R score (20.1 ± 5.9) than females ([17.4 ± 5.6; although the two-sample t -test showed only a marginally significant difference between sexes ( p -value = 0.058)].

Children from higher-income households were more likely to be in Profile 2 (normative functioning) than in Profile 1 “Relative weakness in all domains” (see Table 3 ), though findings were marginally significant (OR=0.55, p =0.058).

The multivariate test of the multivariate analysis of variance with number of correct answers, number of words per correct answer, and seconds per correct answer was marginally significant, F (3, 47) = 2.68, p = .058, η 2 = .15.

There was a marginally significant interaction between habitat type and year on non‐native richness ( p = 0.058) in the direction of non‐native species increasing more rapidly in anthropogenic parks, but otherwise habitat type did not have a significant impact on richness, abundance, or proportion of native individuals ( p > 0.09).