After controlling for education, the effect was marginally significant ( p = .057).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The comparison between the weak and free models was marginally significant ( p = .057), suggesting a slight preference for the free model, while the comparison between the strong and free models did not show a significant difference ( p = .360).
The location–instruction interaction was marginally significant ( F (2,22) = 3.303; p = 0.057; η 2 = 0.231; BF 10 = 0.335), resulting from presaccadic enhancement (increased peak-SF during saccade preparation relative to fixation) surviving FDR correction only for the horizontal ( t = 3.082; p = 0.031; d = 0.728) and the upper vertical ( t = 3.082; p = 0.031; d = 0.728) meridian ( Fig. 6 b ).
The main effect of Day was marginally significant in both languages: German words, F (1, 23) = 4.01, p = 0.057, η 2 p = 0.15; novel words, F (1, 23) = 3.17, p = 0.09, η 2 p = 0.12.
The plasma S100B levels for the three AMS sufferers changed from 0.100 μg/l (95 % CI −0.029 to 0.229) at baseline to 0.127 μg/l (95 % CI −0.031 to 0.284) at high altitude which was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) compared to the non-AMS sufferers who showed a non-significant ( p = 0.35) change from 0.187 μg/l (95 % CI 0.102–0.272) at baseline to 0.143 μg/l (95 % CI 0.108–0.179) at altitude.
The total indirect effect was marginally significant (β = 0.845, 95% CI [−0.025, 1.715], p = .057).
The reduction in mitochondrial complexes I and II was marginally significant ( P =0.057 and P =0.097, respectively).
7 Similarly, a repeated measures ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between media framing and the other participant’s nationality on the expected rate of outgroup preemptive strikes, F (1,125) = 3.69, p = 0.057, partial η 2 = 0.03; pairwise comparisons indicated that under both experimental conditions the expected rates of Chinese preemptive strikes (mo
We did, however, find a marginally significant relationship between Covid knowledge asymmetry and anxiety, b = .06, SE = .03, 95% CI: [-.002, .12], t (1021) = 1.90, p = .057 (H1D).
However, after 3 h of bait consumption, a trend emerges, showing a marginally significant decrease in activity (15hs-18hs: estimate= 0.61; p = 0.057).
Employing generalised additive models, we found a lower rate of antidepressant prescriptions for people living within 100 m of higher density of street trees—although this relationship was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) when confounding factors were considered.
We observed that the main effect of craving in the final model was marginally significant (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.99 to 2.41, P = 0.057).
In the first MLM, the interaction of maternal cortisol levels with condition on infant cortisol was marginally significant in the ITT ( b = .435, SE = .229, t = 1.91, p = .057) and PP ( b = ‐.601, SE = .311, t = 1.93, p = .055) approaches.
For N2, notes had a marginally significant main effect, F(2, 98) = 2.95, p = 0.057, and no significant difference was found between any pair of the three notes, and there was no significant main effect of age.
Although our ability to run some higher-order multiple regressions was limited by our sample sizes, the effect of stimulus type was marginally significant in a single fixed effect model ( F 2,22 = 3.278, P = 0.057) and may interact with other effects.
The Emotion × Group Interaction was marginally significant, F (1,87) = 3.73, p = .057, η p 2 = .041, d Z = .21. 4 The priming score for ingroup happy faces ( M = 3.15, SD = 5.70) exceeded that for Middle-Eastern happy faces ( M = 1.05, SD = 5.37, see Table 1 ), t (87) = 2.46, p = .016, whereas ingroup ( M = −0.91, SD = 5.06) and outgroup ( M = −0.88, SD = 6.32) fearful faces were comparable in terms of mean priming scores; t (87) = −0.04 , p = . 970.
The relationship between explanations and condition were marginally significant for 5-year-olds [χ 2 (2) = 5.73, p = 0.057]. “No idea” responses were comparable in both conditions, however, there were more 5-year-olds in the arbitrary condition who referred to wrong explanations than in causal condition and there were more children in causal condition that referred to the “correct explanation” than in the arbitrary condition.
A marginally significant difference from zero for the slopes at 1 SD below the mean (29 years; B = 0.30, SE = 0.16, p = 0.057) indicated the trend that younger age and a higher social media use time were associated with higher levels of perceived loneliness.
boulardii, Lactobacillus , and VSL#3 probiotics in CD was marginally significant ( P =0.057) with efficacy [ 124 ].
conducted another meta‐analysis and their results indicated a marginally significant effect of the Met allele on increasing PTSD risk (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.99–1.26; p =.057).
There were marginally significant decreases in the hs-CRP levels due to both diets ( P = 0.057 in BD group vs.
The PLS analysis for the matched sample ( Figure 3 ) revealed that, the first LV explained 66.55% of the covariance and was marginally significant ( p = 0.057).
For STG, there was a marginally significant main effect of group ( F (1, 58) = 3.782, p = .057).
The difference on FT3 between the subgroups with and without suicide attempts in the female group was not significant, F (1, 906) = 1.32, p = 0.25 > 0.05, η p 2 = 0.001; while the difference on FT3 in the male group was marginally significant, F (1, 906) = 3.62, p = 0.057 , η p 2 = 0.004.
Parasomnia, speech disorders, and cardiovascular disorders had higher RORs in women, while insomnia-related disorders, cognitive disorders, and movement disorders (marginally significant, p = 0.057) had higher RORs in men.