“marginally significant”

The pattern of adaptive plasticity was also evident for gene expression in samples collected at 8 hours after spray, where 44 out of 56 genes with plastic and evolved responses showed adaptive plasticity (binomial p = 2 × 10 −5 ), and marginally significant at 32 hours after spray, where 44 of 71 genes with significant adaptive and plastic responses exhibited adaptive plasticity (binomial p = 0.057, Fig.

The coefficient difference test indicates that the urban–rural gap in public-sphere pro-environmental behaviors is marginally significant ( p = 0.057), while the gap in private-sphere pro-environmental behaviors is not ( p = 0.433).

The main effect of Gender was marginally significant for accuracy (F(1, 58) = 3.8, p = 0.057 [p = 0.062]).

Sensitivity analyses showed that excluding days with alcohol or cannabis use did not change the model structure, though the effect of daily stress on sleep duration became marginally significant ( p = 0.057).

The interaction effect between skill level and AOI was marginally significant ( F (1.69, 28.78) = 3.33, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.16, ε = 0.42).

3.3.2 Surface area A 2 Diagnosis × 2 Sex × 2 Hemisphere × 3 ROI repeated measures ANOVA for the PMC ROIs (SMC, LPM, FEF) revealed a marginally significant main effect of diagnosis (TD > ADHD), F (1,222) = 3.7, p = .057, ηp 2 = .016.

conducted another meta‐analysis and their results indicated a marginally significant effect of the Met allele on increasing PTSD risk (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.99–1.26; p =.057).

The main effect of response portion was non-significant for the averaged-peak amplitudes ( F (1,55) = 0.244, p = 0.624), but marginally significant for the latencies ( F (1,55) = 3.77, p = 0.057), reflecting the fact that the averaged-peak latencies were slightly longer for the steady-state than for the transition portion (Fig. 3a , bottom right panel).

3b , most brain regions of the mentalizing network represent social congruency as revealed by r(same) being higher than r(diff), i.e., r(same) – r(diff) one sample t-test: PC marginally significant (p = 0.057; all p’s Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons, i.e., the number of ROIs), TPJ (p = 0.013) and posterior mPFC (p = 0.011) (see Fig. 3b ).

This analysis revealed that there was only a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 38) = 3.85, p = .057, η p 2 = .092, 95% CI [.000, .282], p(H 1 /D) = .522, a significant main effect of schedule, F (2, 76) = 18.71, p < .001, η p 2 = .330, [.155, .461], p(H 1 /D) = .987, and a significant interaction between the two factors, F (2, 76) = 7.71, p < .001, η p 2 = .169, [.034, .308], p(H 1 /D) = .502.

The frequency baseline model had a marginally significant better fit than the model not including change, Δχ 2 = 9.16, Δdf = 4, p = .057.

The probability by risk-taking interaction was significant in dorsolateral PFC [ F (1,37) = 3.89, P = 0.05] and marginally significant in ventral striatum [ F (1,37) = 3.86, P = 0.057].

Genotype distribution of the ABCB1 C3435T variant was marginally significant between the two groups of patients (P = 0.057), the frequency of the T allele in Clopidogrel non-responders was higher than in the responders (15/19; 78.9%) and (19/36; 52.8%) respectively.

The interaction effect between attention and eccentricity was marginally significant [ F (3, 69) = 2.62, p = 0.057].

Dunnett’s post hoc analysis detected that groups pretreated with DqTx1 ( p = 0.008), DqTx4 ( p = 0.044), and DqTx6 ( p = 0.002) showed an increase in the mean latency for the onset of seizures, and for the effect of DqTx3 was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) ( Table 2 ).

Additionally, weak or marginally significant correlations were observed for pain (r = 0.094, p = 0.057), anxiety (r = 0.080, p = 0.089), and vomiting (r = 0.079, p = 0.091).

In terms of clarity, they appeared to be slightly more positive towards the interaction with the CT ( M = 4.85, SD = 0.34) compared to the RT ( M = 4.45, SD = 0.37) (see Figure 4A ); however, statistically, these findings were marginally significant with a moderate effect size ( Z = −1.903, p = 0.057, r = −0.43).

Additionally, time per session showed a marginally significant negative association with relative ADL changes ( β = −0.258, p = 0.057). 4 Discussion Approximately 20% of participants who completed home‐based rehabilitation showed a decline in ADL 6 months later, whereas 80% of participants exhibited a maintained or improved ADL.

Because of a marginally significant interaction of temperature and endosymbiont infection status on the model (F 1,183 = 3.61; P = 0.057), a step-down analysis of the endosymbiont effect on sex ratio was performed for each thermal treatment separately.

The VTS × Organizational Support interaction was marginally significant ( β = −.068, p = .057).

The same analysis showed that the effect of group was significant for young participants in the target condition (F(1, 80) = 10.25, MSE = 0.064, p = 0.002, and η2 = 0.11), and marginally significant for adult participants in the baseline condition (F(1, 80) = 3.72, p = 0.057, and η2 = 0.04).

However, in the condition where the object which was out in the open was named Betsy retrieved the target object in 11 out of 14 trials, which was marginally significant (binomial test, P = 0.057, 2-tailed).

Model (session x treatment) yielded that in PR, the mean number of lever presses differed across sessions ( χ 2 = 50.295, df = 6, p < 0.0001), and marginal effects indicated a significant reduction on the 4 th session (p = 0.001) and marginally significant reduction on 2 nd session (p = 0.057), as compared to the first test.

The analysis of the CNV component revealed a marginally significant main effect of monetary rewards [ F (1, 22) = 4.028, p = 0.057, η 2 p = 0.155], indicating that the monetary rewards condition resulted in larger negative CNV amplitudes.

A significantly reduced Stroop interference was observed in the EXD group [ F (1,34) = 12.917, p = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.275], whereas the CON group showed a marginally significant change [ F (1,34) = 3.898, p = 0.057, partial η 2 = 0.103; Table 3 and Figure 2A ].