Unadjusted nonparametric analyses revealed significant improvements in disability outcomes at 3 months postsurgery ( P =0.003) and marginally significant improvements at 6 months ( P =0.056) and 1 year postsurgery ( P =0.082) ( Table 3 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Furthermore, a marginally significant group × congruency interaction was evident [ F (1,55) = 3.82, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.065].
At T3, the TCT-Q group exhibited a marginally significant increase in question-asking compared to the TAU group ( p = 0.056).
A marginally significant effect of condition, F (1,15) = 4.31, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.22, revealed higher hit rates when earn colors were presented first relative to when save colors were presented first, specifically at shorter onsets (8 ~ 38), F (1,15) = 4.81, p = 0.044, η 2 = 0.24, where onset information was limited (left panel, Fig. 4a ).
Sensitivity analysis after excluding patients with T3-4N0 disease demonstrated that TPF plus CRT still achieved significantly better OS than PF plus CRT (HR, 0.580; 95% CI, 0.395-0.852; P = 0.005), while the difference between TP plus CRT and PF plus CRT was marginally significant (HR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.503-1.008; P = 0.056).
The interaction effect between input mode and text difficulty was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.81, p = 0.056, indicating that in general, insertions made by the dictation group were more sensitive to text difficulty than those made by the typing group. 4.3.2.
On the other hand, published data have demonstrated that TPF achieved significantly better 10-year OS than PF (HR, 0.58; p = 0.005), and the difference between TP and PF was marginally significant (HR, 0.71; p = 0.056) ( 59 ).
O3PUFA associated with better executive function (Tails B, β = −1.15, p = 0.025, Figure 2C ), however, after adding WMH as a “mediating” variable into the regression equation that included O3PUFA, age, APOE4 and total intracranial volume simultaneously as predictors of executive function, the significant association between O3PUFA and better executive function was lost (β = 0.54, p = 0.332, Figure 2D ) and the WMH association with executive dysfunction remained marginally significant (β = 3589.95, p = 0.056, not illustrated in the Figure).
The results showed marginally significant differences between UK and Brazilian dogs (β = −0.0511 ± 0.0262, p = 0.0561), suggesting that work-type location does have a weak effect on telomere length.
This relationship was marginally significant when the mean number of reported host families was considered (24 vs. 11.4 reported host families, p = .0561).
A marginally significant effect of sex was observed ( p = 0.0561), with male dogs tending to perform this behaviour more frequently than females.
Note that the divergent modules only contained a marginally significant number of synaptic pathways (per module) compared to the non-significant modules ( p = 0.0561).
Participants in the PD-MCI group also showed a marginally significant trend toward less time spent in State 3 relative to the HC group (p = 0.0562, t = 1.98) and significantly less time than the PD-NC (p = 0.0160, t = 2.55) group.
The direct effect on ADL was marginally significant (ADE = 52.22, p = 0.0562), while that on NPI‐Q was not significant (ADE = 24.03, p = 0.5052).
The diversity difference between the two treatment diets was marginally significant in OW dogs ( P = 0.0562) but not in LN dogs ( P = 0.7402), suggesting greater dietary effects on OW dogs than on LN dogs.
Finally, asymptotic performance improved from Day 1 to Day 2, evidenced by a significant reduction in asymptotic error in the one-state SSM (t 23 = 2.83, p = 0.0095, d = 0.58), and a marginally significant reduction in the two-state SSM (t 23 = 2.01, p = 0.0563, d = 0.41).
The PHQ-9 itself showed a positive, albeit marginally significant effect on social contact levels (PHQ-9: .7282, p = .0563).
In 2012, a marginally significant (slightly above the prescribed level of significance, p = 0.0565) but relevant difference was found in the abundance of C. subzerafae between male and female siblings.
Apart from rs7665116 in the transcribed region of the PGC-1α gene, SNP rs2970870, located in the promoter region, showed a marginally significant effect on the HD AAO in the first analysis of covariance (P = 0.0566; Table 1 ).
The Friedman test showed a marginally significant difference among four conditions ( p = 0.0567).
Interestingly, in both Aymara and Quechua, when compared to the standard demographic model, Tajima’s D values are marginally significant (P values = 0.0568 and 0.0565, S2C Fig ) around chr10:82.0~82.3 Mb, and Fay and Wu’s H values are significant in both highlander groups in the same region (P values = 0.014 and 0.0212, S2D Fig ).
A two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) on age group (3) as a between-participants factor × stimulus condition (2) as a within-participants factor revealed a significant main effect of condition [ F (1, 2) = 0.505, p = 0.0385] and marginally significant interactions between the two factors [ F (2, 53) = 3.154, p = 0.0568].
On the other hand, there was only a marginally significant association between SUVmax and pMAPK positivity (p = 0.0568).
In addition, marginally significant differences were observed in the elements of “Selecting and communicating option” (p = 0.0569), and “Communication and teamwork” (p = 0.0622).
Interestingly, NanoSight quantitation revealed that HPSC cells secrete more sEVs (mean conc.4.75 × 10 10 particles/ml) compared to HPaStec cells (mean conc.1.35 × 10 10 particles/ml) from the equal number of cells seeded in an equal volume of CM which is marginally significant ( p = 0.0569) ( Table 1 ).