Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
A marginally significant effect of condition, F (1,15) = 4.31, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.22, revealed higher hit rates when earn colors were presented first relative to when save colors were presented first, specifically at shorter onsets (8 ~ 38), F (1,15) = 4.81, p = 0.044, η 2 = 0.24, where onset information was limited (left panel, Fig. 4a ).
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Sensitivity analysis after excluding patients with T3-4N0 disease demonstrated that TPF plus CRT still achieved significantly better OS than PF plus CRT (HR, 0.580; 95% CI, 0.395-0.852; P = 0.005), while the difference between TP plus CRT and PF plus CRT was marginally significant (HR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.503-1.008; P = 0.056).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
O3PUFA associated with better executive function (Tails B, β = −1.15, p = 0.025, Figure 2C ), however, after adding WMH as a “mediating” variable into the regression equation that included O3PUFA, age, APOE4 and total intracranial volume simultaneously as predictors of executive function, the significant association between O3PUFA and better executive function was lost (β = 0.54, p = 0.332, Figure 2D ) and the WMH association with executive dysfunction remained marginally significant (β = 3589.95, p = 0.056, not illustrated in the Figure).
marginally significantp = 0.05631.1× alphagold
Finally, asymptotic performance improved from Day 1 to Day 2, evidenced by a significant reduction in asymptotic error in the one-state SSM (t 23 = 2.83, p = 0.0095, d = 0.58), and a marginally significant reduction in the two-state SSM (t 23 = 2.01, p = 0.0563, d = 0.41).
marginally significantP values = 0.05681.1× alphagold
Interestingly, in both Aymara and Quechua, when compared to the standard demographic model, Tajima’s D values are marginally significant (P values = 0.0568 and 0.0565, S2C Fig ) around chr10:82.0~82.3 Mb, and Fay and Wu’s H values are significant in both highlander groups in the same region (P values = 0.014 and 0.0212, S2D Fig ).
marginally significantp = 0.05681.1× alphagold
A two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) on age group (3) as a between-participants factor × stimulus condition (2) as a within-participants factor revealed a significant main effect of condition [ F (1, 2) = 0.505, p = 0.0385] and marginally significant interactions between the two factors [ F (2, 53) = 3.154, p = 0.0568].
marginally significantp = 0.05691.1× alphagold
Interestingly, NanoSight quantitation revealed that HPSC cells secrete more sEVs (mean conc.4.75 × 10 10 particles/ml) compared to HPaStec cells (mean conc.1.35 × 10 10 particles/ml) from the equal number of cells seeded in an equal volume of CM which is marginally significant ( p = 0.0569) ( Table 1 ).