“marginally significant”

The second word (generally the verb, on over 80% of trials) showed an effect of coherence [F(1,25) = 5.5, p = 0.027], which was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between coherence and group [F(1,25) = 4.02, p = 0.056], whereby only the high imagers showed a speedup in reading times on this second word for sequentially coherent compared to sequentially incoherent pairs (Bonferroni: p < 0.05).

In a third sensitivity analysis using a higher threshold to define high chronic stress in a subset of participants (n=1423), chronic stress was associated with incident hypertension after adjustment for demographics, hypertension risk factors, and baseline stress in model 3 ( P =0.029), but became marginally significant after adjustment for behavioral factors in model 4 ( P =0.056; Table S3 ).

In the multivariable models, the following state-level variables were significantly associated with changes in VCR: Influenza: percentage of adults who report participating in any physical activity (p = .01) Pneumococcal: percentage of adults who report not seeing a doctor in the past 12 months because of cost (p = .02) HZ: health homes (p = .04); percentage of adults who report participating in any physical activity or exercise (p = .01); percentage of adults who report not seeing a doctor in past 12 months because of cost (marginally significant, p = .056) Tetanus: none Conclusion Few state-level variables demonstrated an association with changes in VCR but some significant findings were observed in final models.

In male patients with Alport syndrome, after age adjustment, the negative association between baseline urinary MCP-1/Cr and eGFR slope was marginally significant ( P = 0.056) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

In comparison, when contrasting Met and Val homozygotes, COMT effect on baseline iron was not significant (β = −0.198, p = 0.37), whereas the effect on iron accumulation was marginally significant (β = −0.496, p = 0.056).

Without adjustment, food coverage practice had a marginally significant effect against faltering in girls ( p -value = 0.056).

Frequency of neighboring conspecifics had a marginally significant negative effect for all three groups (light demanding: P = 0.056; mid-tolerant: P = 0.063; shade-tolerant: P = 0.059).

The curvature along the line of disagreement was also marginally significant (curvature test statistic = 0.08, p = 0.056), pointing to a convex surface and suggesting that the willingness to confront injustice decreases toward the midpoint of both scales.

Accuracy rates For accuracy rates, the first model with age and retirement was marginally significant and explained 22.2% of the variance ( R2 = 0.222, adjusted R2 = 0.154, p = .056).

For the remote association task, the main effects were not significant (all F-values < 1.55, all p-values > 0.100), but the interaction was marginally significant (F(1,98) = 1.64, partial η 2 = 0.041, p = 0.056), and the simple main effect test showed that the number of correct responses decreased with contingent-pay only in the laboratory condition (t(89) = 2.47, d = 0.93, p = 0.015) (see Fig 2(A)) .

With regard to brand recall , the mediation analyses showed a marginally significant direct effect of the disclosure on brand recall ( b = 1.72, SE = 0.90, p = 0.056).

A marginally significant difference was observed between the infant and younger-adult faces: t (20) = 2.03, p <0.056, indicating more attraction towards the relevant age categories when categorizing infant compared to adult faces ( Figures 2 & 3 ).

In terms of accuracy, the participant showed a significant improvement in the motion discrimination task ( P = 0.041) and a marginally significant improvement in the localization task ( P = 0.056).

Notably, non-responders exhibited significantly higher LRPS expression compared with responders ( Supplementary Figure S5A ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.015), while CCL20 showed a marginally significant upregulation trend in non-responders ( Supplementary Figure S5B ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.056). 3.8 CCL20 promotes HCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and lactate production in vitro To elucidate the biological functions of CCL20 in HCC, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments using Hep3B and MHCC97H cell lines.

However this was mitigated by a marginally significant interaction by group [group × change, F (1, 30) = 3.969, p = 0.056], such that this effect was observed in tone speakers ( p < 0.001) but not in the control group ( p = 0.215).

RTRs who were nonobese but had metabolic abnormalities demonstrated a marginally significant increase in the risk of MASLD compared with those in the MHNO group, with an OR of 2.74 ( p = 0.056).

In particular, the difference in loss of PTEN expression between SCLC and LCNEC was marginally significant (p=.056).

In YRI, the MBB indicates marginally significant signals at FOXP2 exons 4–8 ( P = 0.056).

EMPA, in Omar et al.'s [ 14 ] study, showed a marginally significant reduction in mPAP during exercise (−2.37 mmHg, p = 0.056), suggesting a trend toward improvement.

Similar to post-test prediction results, we discovered that none of the incoming parameters were significant predictors of NLG, except for marginally significant DPA feature ( B = 0.244, t = 1.946, p = 0.056).

The curvature of the LOIC was marginally significant [a4 = 0.14, 95% CI (−0.004, 0.277), p = 0.056], suggesting that whether adolescents or parents hold high educational expectations is related to better parent–child relationships as reported by parents (see Figure 2B ).

Contrastingly, MR show a marginally significant signal ( p = 0.056; Table 2 ) and is the only growth form to have a statistically significant correlation between PC2 of climate and PC2 of morphology ( p = 0.029; Figure 5D ; Table 2 ).

Phylogenetic Comparative Analyses We observed a significant phylogenetic signal for average infection load (P = 0.033), a marginally significant phylogenetic signal for hazard ratio (P = 0.056) and no significant phylogenetic signal for log response ratio (P = 0.118, Fig 3A–3C ; Table 1 ).

Soil pH was significantly higher in prairie cores than in forest (Table 3 ), and there was a marginally significant trend for forest soils to have higher nitrate concentrations than core ( p = 0.056) and shrub-encroached portions ( p = 0.083) of prairies (Table 3 ).

Result We first conducted a 2 (priming type: individualism, collectivism) ×4 (social distance of close target: individual in the same country, individual in the same town, friend, family member) × 2 (individuals toward whom empathy is extended: socially distant target only, socially close target only) × 2 (contribution level: empathic, prosocial act) repeated ANOVA and found a marginally significant main effect of priming, F (1, 199) = 3.70, p = 0.056, ηp 2 = 0.02, a post hoc test found that participants’ overall moral judgments were significantly higher in the collectivist priming condition ( M = 6.19, SD = 0.12) than in the individualist priming condition ( M = 5.87, SD = 0.11), in which collectivism had higher overall moral ratings than individualism for different types of acts.