“marginally significant”

A marginally significant interaction revealed that the same pattern emerged for face’s BS as well (Wald = 2.902, df = 2, p = .055).

The results showed that the effect of emotion group was marginally significant, F (1, 53) = 3.86, p = .055, η p 2 = .07, with worse delayed memory in the positive condition ( M = .26, SE = .02) than in the control condition ( M = .31, SE = .02).

However, while the impact of depression was higher among families affected by COVID-19 compared to those not affected by COVID-19 (35% vs 22%), the significance level was marginally significant ( P =.055), possibly due to the sample size.

In other words, we found that monkeys' preference toward a particular color was marginally significant at the group level [Two-way ANOVA, F (3) = 2.59, p = 0.055] ( Figure 4H ).

These factors were included in a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 39) = 3.83, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.09.

Table 2 also shows a marginally significant effect for the PII (F (2,50) = 3.01; p = .055), and PIx3 concerning the high frequency band (F (2,50) = 2.99, p = .056); these parameters trended to be higher for the SFT than for the FT and SIT tasks.

Results Offspring performance Source population ( F 1,193 = 10.450, P = 0.0014) and maternal diet ( F 1,193 = 33.577, P < 0.0001) had a significant effect on egg mass, with a marginally significant interaction between source population and maternal diet ( F 1,193 = 3.727, P = 0.055).

The main effect of T2 duration was marginally significant, F (2.07, 45.56) = 3.055, p = .055.

To investigate directly the difference between schema‐updating and schema‐violating trials, we followed up with another linear mixed‐effects model that only included data from schema‐updating and schema‐violating trials, which showed a marginally significant difference ( b = 3.03, SE = 1.58, t = 1.92, p = 0.055, 95% CI [−9.46, 5.78], partial R 2 = 0.0018).

In the regression model with initial hsCRP as independent and initial BMI, body fat and pre-study alcohol consumption as independent variables, BMI and alcohol consumption were marginally significant ( p = 0.055 and 0.056 resp.; adjusted R 2 = 0.19, p < 0.0001; data not shown).

The interaction between groups and recorded side of the tongue resulted marginally significant ( t 22 = 2.023, P = 0.055), suggesting a greater difference in DS (with respect to fluent speakers) in the spontaneous and sustained pre-TMS EMG activity, when comparing the tongue right side versus the left one ( Z = 2.845, P = 0.004; r = 0.858 - d = 0.429-).

The ANOVA revealed only a marginally significant effect of Contingency, F (1, 197) = 3.72, p = .055, η 2 = .02, BF 0 = 1.17.

The association between a higher C2C/CPII ratio and faster progression was marginally significant ( P = 0.055).

The interaction between Norm Type and Willingness to Donate was marginally significant, F (2, 386) = 2.93, p =.055, η p 2 =.015).

Results for the incidence of amnestic MCI, however, showed a marginally significant higher rate for males ( p =.055).

Additionally, the difference in the number of complicated inguinal hernias between the two periods was marginally significant, and it increased from 11.4% to 23.4% during the COVID-19 period (p = 0.055).

The effect of rice genotype on pmoA copy number was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

However, the heavier the mother the faster was the rate of growth of its offspring, this effect was marginally significant (mother weight = 0.006, se = 0.003, p = 0.055, Table 3 ).

Upon adjustment, individuals born in countries other than Greece were less likely to experience an MO of testing, although this association was marginally significant (aOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.22–1.02; p = 0.055).

When we repeated the analysis using the negative value of FIB-4 < 1.45 (rule out criterion for the presence of LF), we found an inverse association between low FIB-4 score and AEs at univariable OR: 0.45, 95%CI 0.24–0.86, p = 0.015, a marginally significant value at multivariable analysis (using Model A variables) with OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.01, p = 0.055).

Alone, ERQ-Reappraisal was a marginally significant predictor of reaction times, F (1, 83.4) = 3.79, p = .055.

This trend was marginally significant after adjusting for age and HIV/ART status (OS: HR = 0.02, P = 0.055; PFS: HR = 0.07, P = 0.11; Cox regression).

The main effect of time was marginally significant ( F (1, 283) = 3.702, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.013), the main effect of group was not significant ( F (1, 283) = 0.471, p = 0.493, η p 2 = 0.002), but the time × group interaction was significant ( F (1, 283) = 10.409, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.035).

There was a marginally significant difference in depression scores ( p = 0.055), with females having slightly higher scores (mean = 10.11 ± 4.06) than males (mean = 8.80 ± 3.18).

When break weight trials were examined in isolation to determine how many attempts were made before quitting, stimulation did have a small, marginally significant effect [ F (2,42) = 3.1, p = 0.055; Figure 5D , right].