“marginally significant”

The demographic variables (see Table 1 ) of women making informed or uninformed choices did not differ significantly, although the relationship between educational level and informed/uninformed choices was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

When evaluated in a Cox model with backward selection, only vimentin.N emerged as a marginally significant parameter using 0.05 as the traditional threshold for inclusion in a final model ( P =0.055, hazard ratio=4.10).

AMH levels exhibited a marginally significant positive trend (OR 1.124; 95% CI 0.997–1.286; p = 0.055).

However, sVEGFR2 levels significantly decreased in all nine patients by C1D14 after exposure to sunitinib ( P = 0.004), and showed a marginally significant decrease from days 1 to day 28 ( P = 0.055).

Simple main effect analyses demonstrated that somatic anxiety increased from the pre- to the pressure test and was significant for the contraction group ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for the no-contraction group ( p = 0.055).

ving flags [χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 16.269, p < 0.001], using personification and choosing among different text-image relations [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 13.141, p = 0.001], using personification and using iconography in general [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 6.180, p = 0.046], with those instances involving people being marginally significant [ χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 3.681, p = 0.055], but still more significant than the remaining subtypes.

There was a marginally significant difference in depression scores ( p = 0.055), with females having slightly higher scores (mean = 10.11 ± 4.06) than males (mean = 8.80 ± 3.18).

The results showed that the effect of emotion group was marginally significant, F (1, 53) = 3.86, p = .055, η p 2 = .07, with worse delayed memory in the positive condition ( M = .26, SE = .02) than in the control condition ( M = .31, SE = .02).

Similarly, when gender, Chinese tests, and English tests were added as covariates, most of the significant interaction effects between Language and Group Type for N170 amplitude remained significant, and only one interaction effect became marginally significant ( p = 0.055) when using Chinese tests as a covariate.

The Seagrass and Mangrove sites showed fewer Cyanobacteria than the Phytoplankton site (ANOVA, marginally significant differences p = 0.055, n = 12) and different Proteobacterial groups, mainly in the Alphaproteobacteria class.

Analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of condition, ( F (1, 38) = 3.92, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.10) with a greater proportion of utilitarian responses observed in the simulated action condition compared to the judgment condition.

The IncuCyte® Live-Cell Analysis revealed a marginally significant increase in the migration of SCC-24A by EVs (2 × 5 μg/mg) from F. nucleatum compared to control cells ( P = 0.055; Fig. 7 a).

Paired sample t tests revealed a marginally significant decrease in AD in the multi-domain CogTr group (student’s t (16) = 2.066, two-tailed P = 0.055); conversely, no significant alteration was seen in the controls (student’s t (13) = −0.401, two-tailed P = 0.695).

Indeed, we did see that concurrent load increased partner-duplications at generation, consistent with its demonstrated effect on working memory ( Quinn and Ralston, 1986 ; Smyth and Pendleton, 1989 ; Lawrence et al., 2001 ; Can et al., 2017 ), and decreased correct recall of partner actions [this simple effect was marginally significant, F (2,34) = 3.17, MSe = 2.33, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.157].

JFLS mastication The analysis of JFLS Mastication scores showed a marginally significant negative association with pregnancy status (Coefficient = -1.4679, p = 0.055).

There was a marginally significant interaction between Trial type and Simon score ( t = 1.92, p = 0.055), suggesting a trend that the higher Simon scores showed the greater mixing costs.

The prevalence of CP class B/C showed a marginally significant difference between these two groups ( P = 0.055).

p ]The mean 1-back latency in the older group was lower after green tea extract and this change was marginally significant (P = 0.055), but no significant change was observed in the younger group (P = 0.77).

A marginally significant association was found for SARS-CoV-2 positivity within the age group ( p = 0.055), and no statistically significant association was found for SARS-CoV-2 positivity within gender ( p = 0.44) (Table 2 ).

However, we retained two marginally significant effects, one for A on GCSE scores (β = .16, p = .055) and the quadratic effect of S on preclinical knowledge in years I and 2 (β = −.12, p = .068).

The difference between 3 and 30 s conditioned groups was significant under saline [ t (22) = 3.292, p < 0.005], and the reversed pattern of difference under 0.4 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT was marginally significant [ t (22) = 2.028, p = 0.055]. 3.1.3.

This interaction was marginally significant, F ( 1 , 350 ) = 3.70, p < 0.055, [ η p 2 ] = 0.010.

The Type-II-MANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect for Group ( F (1,17) = 2.38, p = .055).

The experimental group exhibited significant improvement in PFS ( p = 0.016) but marginally significant improvements in DCR ( p = 0.055).

The difference in OS by rLN was marginally significant in the entire model (P=0.055).