“marginally significant”

15–20 years after colonization for each), we found significant differences in minimum frequency ( p = 0.006; estimate ± 95% CI = −0.04 ± 0.03; d ± 95% CI = 0.62 ± 0.44) and marginally significant differences in maximum frequency ( p = 0.017; estimate ± 95% CI = –0.025 ± 0.02; d ± 95% CI = 0.54 ± 0.44), but not frequency bandwidth ( p = 0.39; estimate ± 95% CI = 0.015 ± 0.03; d ± 95% CI = −0.19 ± 0.44) and not trill rate ( p = 0.45; estimate ± 95% CI = −0.63 ± 1.63; d ± 95% CI = −0.17 ± 0.44).

By contrast, during the Chow-cue test the devaluation effect was significant during all five 1-min bins, save for a marginally significant result in minute 4 (minute 1: F (1,18) = 6.95, p = 0.017; minute 2: F (1,18) = 16.02, p = 0.001; minute 3: F (1,18) = 6.18, p = 0.023; minute 4: F (1,18) = 4.13, p = 0.057; minute 4: F (1,18) = 5.95, p = 0.025).

The comparison between neutral and pleasant stimuli and the comparison between neutral and unpleasant stimuli (with the Bonferroni-corrected alpha set at 0.05/3 = 0.01667) were both marginally significant [ t (31) = 2.54, p = 0.017, and t (31) = 2.41, p = 0.022, respectively].

After correction for multiple comparisons, a marginally significant negative correlation between negative affect and VFT performance was found ( r (76) = -.27, p = .017).

Mutating basic residues had only a marginally significant effect ( P = 0.017).

However, marginally significant differences were found for MSLP4 , both in allelic ( p = 0.01711) and genotypic ( p = 0.01700) frequencies (Table 1 , suggesting a potential association with rejection behaviour.

There was a marginally significant difference in the IOP between groups (P = 0.0176, mixed-effects model).

Cost biases correlated positively with LSAS ( r s = 0.47, p = 0.001), while probability biases were marginally significant ( r s = 0.30, p = 0.018).

NCERS was also a marginally significant predictor of increased NSSI frequency (β = 0.03, p = .018).

The infertility rate was marginally significant in secondary infertilities ( p = 0.018).

Patients with high risk had shorter RFS in the validation set1 with a marginally significant p -value of 0.069 Figure 4f and shorter OS ( p = .018, Figure 4g ).

And nitrogen fertilization rate showed a significant negative correlation with Chao1 ( R 2 = 0.051, p = 0.079) and a marginally significant negative correlation with richness ( R 2 = 0.141, p = 0.018).

However, the VAN module showed only a marginally significant difference ( F (1, 85) = 5.793, p = 0.018, q = 0.050, 95% CI [0.003, 0.043], η p 2 = 0.064) after FDR correction, indicating a trend toward higher entropy in BD patients. 3.4.

The interaction between fungal load and body condition on call duration had a medium effect size ( η 2 = 0.09) and was marginally significant with the Bonferroni correction ( F 1, 58 = 5.952, p = 0.018; Table 2 ).

In HCs, the slope was marginally significant: %CBF reduction = 0.171 × %CO reduction − 4.708; R 2 = 0.114; p = 0.018.

ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of gamble type on risky choice in the original sample and a marginally significant effect in the replication sample (original: F (2,148) = 4.85, P = 0.018 sphericity corrected; replication: F (2,62) = 3.27, P = 0.054 sphericity corrected).

This difference was marginally significant [ t (20) = −2.57; p = 0.018; d = 1.14].

This enhancement was marginally significant in CHLA-119 ( P =0.018) xenografts.

In addition, a marginally significant potential hotspot (E132; three mutations, p = 0.018) is located in the α-helix between two amino acid motifs (G4, NKXD and G5, EXSAK) that are important for binding the guanine base of the nucleotide 32 .

Follow-up contrasts between the familiar face condition and the other three conditions (alpha corrected = .016) revealed marginally significant differences between the familiar face condition and the unfamiliar arrow condition ( p = .018, 95% CI [1.15 to 11.82]) as well as a marginally significant difference between the familiar face and unfamiliar arrow conditions ( p = .02, 95% CI [.90 to 11.82]).

This was true when hs-cTnT was added to the individual parameters of the FRS (Model 1: HR hs-cTnT 1.02, P = 0.007 and Chi-square change 5.23, P = 0.022) or marginally significant when added to the complete FRS algorithm (Model 2: HR hs-cTnT 1.02, P = 0.018 and Chi-square change 3.58, P = 0.058).

Professionals working 8 hours per day had higher knowledge scores at all stages, however it was considered significant only in the Transfusion Step, and yet, it was considered marginally significant (p= 0.018).

Follow-up comparisons revealed a significant difference between MEP change at 5 and 15 mins after iTBS ( t (39) = 2.78, p = 0.008), a marginally significant difference between 5 and 25 mins ( t (39) = 2.48, p = 0.018), and no significant difference between 15 and 25 mins after ( t (39) = 1.52, p = 0.136; adjusted alpha = 0.017).

We also found that CGIs on the X Chromosome are more highly methylated compared with autosomal CGIs in both male and female liver tissues (Kruskal–Wallis χ 2 = 17.494, df = 3, P -value = 0.0005592), and similar, marginally significant trends were observed in other tissues (muscle: Kruskal–Wallis χ 2 = 16.864, df = 7, P -value = 0.01829; gonad: Kruskal–Wallis χ 2 = 9.4642, df = 3, P -value = 0.02372) ( Supplemental Fig. 6 ).

This association was marginally significant in group 2 subjects (Coefficients, −0.002; 95% CI, −0.004–0; P = 0.0185), but was no more valid in group 3 subjects (Coefficients, −0.005; 95% CI, −0.011–0.001; P = 0.0985).