Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
However, results on the Control group showed a significant moderate negative correlation r = −0.579, p = 0.048 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of anger, and a marginally significant negative correlation (moderate), r = −0.570, p = 0.053 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of happiness.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
E− Conditions Only (Normal and Opaque Sunglasses) The interaction between Belief and Group with the E− conditions was marginally significant, F (1,47) = 3.99, p = 0.053, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta _{{\text{p}}}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.077.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
For both models, male patients had lower GDS scores than female patients (β = −1.98, p < 0.01—first model; β = −1.93, p = 0.003—second model); there were no significant effects for education levels, and pension had a negative association with GDS scores, which was marginally significant (β = −0.0005, p = 0.053).
marginally significantP = 0.0531.1× alphagold
On the other hand, vital-surgical residents reported significantly lower QOL, higher stress, and lower satisfaction scores than vital-medical or other-surgical residents (except for a marginally significant difference in satisfaction compared with the vital-medical group, P = 0.053), even though there was no significant difference in perceived weekly work hours.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
That is, the effect of negative affectivity on total COBEL scores varied between the genders, β = 0.669, p = 0.034. As can be seen from Supplementary Table 1 , in boys the link between negative affectivity and olfactory reactivity and awareness was positive, although marginally significant, Spearman’s ρ = 0.247, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.62.