Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp-value < 0.0531.1× alphagold
The estimated odds ratio for the proportion of women who complete secondary school or more is marginally significant (p-value < 0.053), suggesting that a 10 percent increase in the proportion of women/peers who complete secondary school or more is associated with a two percentage point decrease in the proportion of daughters who are circumcised a generation later.
marginally significantp = .0531.1× alphagold
Effects of the narrative intervention Effects of the narrative intervention compared to pre-test scores The results of the paired samples t -test comparing pre-test scores and post-test scores in condition A show that there was a marginally significant difference between pre-test scores and post-test scores safer sex communication intentions with a sexual partner, t (70) = −1.97, p = .053, and a significant difference between pre-test scores and post-test scores for safer sex communication intentions with friends, t (71) = −3.01, p < .01.
Using a narrative to spark safer sex communication.
Health Educ J · 2017 · PMC5580782
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
However, results on the Control group showed a significant moderate negative correlation r = −0.579, p = 0.048 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of anger, and a marginally significant negative correlation (moderate), r = −0.570, p = 0.053 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of happiness.
marginally significantP=0.0531.1× alphagold
Results Our finding showed that serum triglycerides (TG) (n=5, WMD -38.50 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.68 to -15.31; P=0.001) and total cholesterol (TC) (n=4, WMD -18.70 mg/dL, 95%CI -34.85 to -2.53; P=0.023) decrease following diet intervention along with marginally significant weight reduction (n=5, WMD -3.61 mg/dL, 95%CI -7.25 to 0.04; P=0.053).
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
The model including the diversity variable revealed a significant interaction between face race and index number, χ 2 (1, N = 89) = 6.95, p = 0.008, and a marginally significant interaction between face race, diversity of experience, and index number, χ 2 (2, N = 89) = 5.87, p = 0.053.
Infant Eye Gaze While Viewing Dynamic Faces.
Brain Sci · 2021 · PMC7918747
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Likewise, in lag1 trials, a marginally significant main effect of time-cue condition (F(1, 39) = 3.98, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.09) revealed a tendency of higher T2 accuracy when the preceding trial was also a lag1 trial (compared with a single-target trial); however, the effect appeared to be independent of whether or not participants paid attention to the temporal information ( Figure 2 E).
marginally significantp = .0531.1× alphagold
There was a marginally significant Group × Time interaction predicting TEPS scores (b = 3.34, 95% CI: [−0.04, 6.72], f = 0.272, χ 2(1) = 3.75, p = .053), such that participants in iNarratives with Coaching reported a marginally greater increase in pleasure compared with the participants in iCBT with Coaching during treatment.
marginally significantP = 0.0531.1× alphagold
When comparing only the L1014F frequency between groups at Chulaimbo, the difference is marginally significant (OR = 3.957, 95% CI = [0.781–21.713], P = 0.053; Fischer’s exact test) and could be limited by a low sample size in the resistance group ( N = 14), whereas there was no significant difference in L1014S frequencies between susceptible and resistant groups (OR = 0.525, 95% CI = [0.197–1.364], P = 0.185, Fischer’s exact test).
marginally significantp-value = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Although age was a marginally significant predictor in phase 1 (p-value = 0.053) and not related in phase 2 (p-value = 0.985), a one-year increase in the SW's age was significantly associated with a 5% [OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.98, p-value = 0.001)] decrease in the odds of supplying condomless-sex.