“marginally significant”

This difference was marginally significant, t (14) = 2.11, p = 0.053.

Our second analysis focusing on anemone survival revealed a significant decline in anemone survival in 2023-2024 (Firth logistic regression: β = –8.44 ± 1.91, p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table 2 ), and a marginally significant decline in anemone survival with increasing anemonefish group size (Firth logistic regression: β = –1.20 ± 0.69, p = 0.053; Supplementary Table 3 ).

A marginally significant increase in risk was observed in female patients ( P = 0.053) and IDH-wildtype patients ( P = 0.060).

It is noteworthy that “my supervisor used my data in papers/patents without acknowledging my contribution” was also marginally significant difference ( p = 0.053) among the three major science categories. • “my supervisor took away or threatened to take away my funding” Follow up analyses of standardized residuals indicate that participants in Engineering experienced higher than expected rates of four of the five contextual behaviors: visa cancellation threats, lab stays, threats to funding and unacknowledged use of data ( Figure 2 ).

In the resulting model, the density of voles in year t − 1 became marginally significant (GLMM, coefficient estimate = 0.12, CI: 0.00 – 0.25, p = .053).

There was no significant difference between the control group and taxol- or EGCG-treated group, while the difference between the control group and combination treatment group was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

However, significant or marginally significant clusters can be found in the unattended condition (permutation test with small volume correction: cluster p = 0.053 for the contralateral SC, and p < 0.001 for the ipsilateral SC.

The regression model for the pain thresholds in the dominant hand was marginally significant, F (10, 110) = 1.90, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.147.

Likewise, in lag1 trials, a marginally significant main effect of time-cue condition (F(1, 39) = 3.98, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.09) revealed a tendency of higher T2 accuracy when the preceding trial was also a lag1 trial (compared with a single-target trial); however, the effect appeared to be independent of whether or not participants paid attention to the temporal information ( Figure 2 E).

Among female boxers, the probability that randomly selected left-hander showed a higher BoxRec score was 53.9%, which a Mann-Whitney test showed was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

A chi-square analysis was performed and the effect was marginally significant, indicating increased forgetting over time [χ 2 (1) = 3.75, p = 0.053; Cramer’s φ = 0.31].

Although this difference was marginally significant in univariate testing ( p = 0.053), the performance of the app in stimulating test requests was significantly better than the brochures in logistic models that adjusted for income.

Results In total, 1 year after the mindset induction, students originally assigned at random to the Develop condition reported on average greater intentions to use cultivation strategies when their passion was low ( M = 27.61, SD = 3.75), compared to those in the Fit condition—a marginally significant effect ( M = 25.57, SD = 4.74), b = 2.04, [0.02, 4.11], t (68) = 1.97, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.48.

The results showed that the tDCS effect was not statistically significant in the fair condition, F (2,74) = 0.16, P = 0.856, η p 2 = 0.004 but marginally significant in the unfair condition, F (2,74) = 3.06, P = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.076.

In short, there was a marginally significant first-order effect of ethnocentrism on prestimulus alpha power (β = 0.14, t (158) = 1.95, p = .053), but no other first-order or interaction effects.

Similarly, the correlation slopes of the AD patients were significantly more negative than those of healthy OA in the E/N bands and marginally significant ( p = 0.053) in the M band.

The mean MUAC was 24.8 cm (SD = 2.64) and the proportion of participants with poor nutritional status was higher among those with inadequate dietary diversity (25.7% vs 19.1%), which was a marginally significant ( p = 0.053) difference ( Table 3 ).

We found no significant association between iron supplementation (37/98 or 37.8%) and maternal sTfR concentrations (p = 0.95) or with the combined sTfR-ferritin indexes following log transformation (p = 0.20 to 0.97), while there was a marginally significant association between serum ferritin concentrations and supplemental iron intake (p = 0.053).

Subsequent one-way ANOVAs showed that there were significant effects of angular deviations for Targets, F (6,150) = 4.257, p = 0.001, η 2 p = 0.146, marginally significant effects for Probes, F (6,150) = 2.128, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.078, but not significant effects for Irrelevants, F (6,150) = 1.361, p = 0.234, η 2 p = 0.052.

There were marginally significant associations between TASC-r total score ( B = − 0.66, SE = 0.27 , t (39) = − 2.48, adjusted p = 0.053) and TASC-r task subscale score ( B = − 1.04, SE = 0.38 , t (39) = − 2.76, adjusted p = 0.053) predicting decreased CL-ARI in the next rating.

The two-way interaction between decision-maker and moral belief was marginally significant ( F (1,250) = 3.79, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.015).

VC in the two groups was 0.07 and marginally significant ( P = 0.053) [ Table 4 ].

Subgroup analyses Subgroup analyses revealed significant effect modification by episode status (interaction p = 0.045) and marginally significant interactions for illness duration ( P = 0.053), gender ( p = 0.056), and age ( p = 0.057).

Exploratory analyses also found marginally significant pairwise group differences for CS+ nr Block 1 (Z = -1.93 , p = .053 ) and CS- Block 1 (Z = -1.91 , p = .056 ).

We found a marginally significant correlation between increase in LPI and FSIQ ( r = 0.35, p = 0.053), suggesting that individuals with higher intellectual abilities saw greater improvement from the CCT.