“marginally significant”

Novelty check A between-participant ANOVA with historical representation as a three-level factor revealed a marginally significant effect of treatment condition on how new participants perceived aspects of African history they watched, F (1, 261) = 3.78, p = .053, η p 2 = .014, with participants in the positive history condition ( M = 3.21, SD = 2.01) perceiving the aspects of history as more novel in comparison to participants in the negative factual history condition ( M = 2.77, SD = 1.66).

After controlling for Φ PSII , differences in A mass among species were marginally significant in ANOVA ( p = 0.053; Table 1 ) or not significant in the post hoc Bonferroni test ( p > 0.05 for all species pairs; Figure 2 c). 3.3.

ineffective) on theta ITC was marginally significant in the early time window, F (1, 15) = 4.420, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.228, and significant in the late time window, F (1, 15) = 9.281, p = 0.008, η p 2 = 0.382.

The results showed that the tDCS effect was not statistically significant in the fair condition, F (2,74) = 0.16, P = 0.856, η p 2 = 0.004 but marginally significant in the unfair condition, F (2,74) = 3.06, P = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.076.

A marginally significant difference was observed between ANXA10 expression and Lauren classification ( p = 0.053, Fisher’s exact test).

Further ANOVA analysis revealed that the GAD group showed marginally significant higher negative HEP amplitude than the HC group in the EO state ( p = 0.053), but not in the EC state.

There was a marginally significant effect of ratio, F (2, 104) = 3.02, p = 0.053, The Developing Mental Number Line: Does Its Directionality Relate to 5- to 7-Year-Old Children’s Mathematical Abilities? = 0.055, and a linear contrast analysis revealed a statistically significant linear trend, F (1, 55) = 4.45, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.079, such that performance improved as ratio decreased (e.g., better performance for a ratio of 4:7 than 4:5), as expected.

Although the interaction between group and sentence type was marginally significant ( p = 0.053, χ 2 = 18.143, R 2 = 0.20), the effect of group was not significant for any of the sentence types.

Furthermore, the median ARS duration for late recurrence was 10 months, while the median ARS duration for early recurrence was six months, and the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

After controlling for KPS score, BMI, and stage of disease, EV IL-2 concentration was marginally significant ( p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.050) and GM-CSF remained significant ( p = 0.019, η 2 = 0.055).

This association was marginally significant among those with high birth weight (P = 0.053).

7 , Table 2 ), and exhibited marginally significant differences between groups in terms of the (NpD-NpV) pattern expression (accuracy=61 ± 5%, P = 0.053) 56 .

The multivariate analysis identified radicular pain as a marginally significant predictor of spinal cord injury (P = 0.053).

A marginally significant increase in risk was observed in female patients ( P = 0.053) and IDH-wildtype patients ( P = 0.060).

9.2% respectively). Oncological outcomes (OS, CSS) In stage II prostate cancer, significantly better OS is observed in the HIFU group compared with the RT group before IPTW adjustment ( p = 0.001), but the significance is marginally significant after IPTW adjustment ( p = 0.053).

For categories of combined plasma Aβ, it showed that the significant associations observed previously remained marginally significant only in the non-treated-HP group (OR = 2.307 [95% CI, 0.991–5.374], P = 0.053, Supplementary Table S3 ) and not in the treated-HP group (OR = 2.607 [95% CI, 0.417–10.237], P = 0.374, Supplementary Table S3 ).

After controlling for age, the results reported significant group differences in FBI levels ( F (2,68) = 6.252, p = 0.003, partial η 2 = 0.157); FGW ( F (2,67) = 16,670, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.332) and marginally significant differences in body anxiety ( F (2,67) = 3.077, p = 0.053, partial η 2 = 0.084).

An interaction contrast test comparing the size of the interval effect at low and high frequencies was, after correction, marginally significant [estimated difference of differences = 2.16 dB, F (1, 10.00) = 6.77, p = 0.053], providing modest evidence that the size of the interval effect differed between low and high frequencies, although in both cases the trend was in the same direction, with a larger interval producing a lower TMR at threshold.

Inclusion of the interaction term treatment type × elevation (Table S5) significantly improved the model fit ( χ 2 = 8.44, P < 0.038) and was marginally significant (df = 2, LRT = 5.864, P = 0.053).

Further, chi-square difference tests evaluating unconstrained versus constrained models were marginally significant for both youth and maternal reports, Δχ 2 (1) = 3.73, p = 0.053, Δχ 2 (1) = 3.55, p = 0.060, respectively, which indicates that these paths differed marginally by youth gender.

Finally, there was a marginally significant ( p = 0.053) result showing more non-LE state doctors (M = 6.96, SD = 9.97) than LE state doctors (M = 5.27, SD = 8.39) directly told patients their Lyme disease symptoms were just in their head (i.e., psychosomatic).

The intercept was marginally significant ( p =.053), consistent with numerically near-chance performance (~53.7%) at SOA = 0 ms.

In contrast, when shep is knocked down, a marginally significant increase in luciferase levels is observed ( p = 0.053), demonstrating that shep negatively affects insulator activity in the CNS.

Curiously, we observed that colonies headed by queens reared in treated wax had a lower number of varroa mites per bee and this effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

We found a marginally significant correlation between increase in LPI and FSIQ ( r = 0.35, p = 0.053), suggesting that individuals with higher intellectual abilities saw greater improvement from the CCT.