“marginally significant”

The effect of pollination treatment on the probability of flowering in the third year tended to differ between species (marginally significant pollination by species interaction in Table 2 , p = 0.052).

The MNND Lactuca distance showed a marginally significant effect on the growth and recruitment of Lactuca (p = 0,052 and 0.085, respectively; see Table 2 ).

Previously screened The variation of the self-sampling effect by previous screening history was marginally significant ( P = 0.052), with the strongest effects observed among women screened less than 5 years ago and women without registered screening.

Follow-up exploratory analysis showed a marginally significant positive relationship between HbA 1c levels and mI within the T1DM group ( F (1,5) = 6.44, p = 0.052, R 2 = 0.56, Fig 4B ).

The path from healthcare satisfaction to subjective health, controlling for belonging, was marginally significant in the negative direction (B = −0.081, SE = 0.042, p = 0.052).

Treatment effects also varied significantly by newborn sex for newborn weight ( p = 0.028) with marginally significant results for weight to length ratio-for-age z -score ( p = 0.052) and length-for-age z -score ( p = 0.071).

Cases with high miR-150-5p expression were also found to have more frequent intraperitoneal recurrence than those with non-high miR-150-5p expression, with the difference being marginally significant (20.5% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.052).

Much debate was ignited by a marginally significant 16% ( P = 0.052) reduction in fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction in the UKPDS where chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or glipizide were used as initial therapy in newly diagnosed uncomplicated diabetic patients ( 1 ).

There was a similar magnitude reduction in IPV for married adolescents in Arm 3, though the findings were marginally significant (aIRR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21–1.01, p = 0.052).

The Observed species index included 8 studies (k = 8, N = 2302) and exhibited a marginally significant increase associated with exercise (g = 0.19, 95% CI: −0.002–0.39, P = 0.052), with low between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%).

The overall mean age of the two groups was 27.7 years, with the patients in group A being younger than those in group B by only a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.052).

These analyses did not detect a significant density effect on invasive snails ( p = .336) but did reveal a marginally significant effect of density treatment on embryo production for native snails ( p = .052; Table 5 ).

In this model, LSC-R total was only a marginally significant predictor of OFC strength (β = −0.055, SE = 0.027, p = .052) whereas the estimates of the other predictors (PTSD, age, ASI drug and alcohol use) remained very similar. 5 Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate neural correlates of PTSD and traumatic stress in women diagnosed with SUD.

It is worth mentioning that the difference in life satisfaction was marginally significant with regard to gender in this study, with females more satisfied with life than their male counterparts (22.88 vs 22.14, p = 0.052).

Except “place of drying washable material” that was marginally significant (p-value=0.0521), the two groups differed significantly in all other self-care variables ( Table 2 ).

When patients with DSS were compared only with patients with DHF, the difference in allele frequency of rs3765524-C at PLCE1 between DSS and DHF groups was statistically significant (one-sided P = 0.0399), and the difference in allele frequency of rs3132468-C at MICB was marginally significant (one-sided P = 0.0521).

The influence of SPL on the proportion of HBOs was marginally significant (estimate ± SE = 0.265 ± 0.137; z = 1.943; p = 0.0521; Fig. 3 ).

The correlation of CA125 to disease recurrence was marginally significant ( p = 0.0522) without enough statistical power to make a definitive statement about it.

The overall survival for S6K1 showed a marginally significant result ( p = 0.0523) with fatal outcome being most frequent in the group of patients with lower level of S6K1 expression, 64.7%, while 39.3% patients without change in expression and 23.1% of patients with higher level of expression had died in the same period of time ( Figure 3 ).

We observed a marginally significant increase in aVL ( P <0.0523) and aVF ( P <0.0607).

Between-subgroup differences were significant under the fixed-effects model ( P = 0.0201) and marginally significant under the random-effects model ( P = 0.0523) ( Figure 6C ). 3.4.5 Publication bias Publication bias for the IL-1β outcome was systematically assessed using multiple approaches.

In season II, rain (−), temperature (−), and insolation (+) significantly correlated with CBB infestation on the plant, whereas rain (+) and humidity (−, marginally significant at P = 0.0524) significantly correlated with CBB infestation on the ground ( Table 3 ).

At the outpatient level, consumption exhibited an immediate and marginally significant increase following 2020 ( p = 0.05244), interrupting an otherwise consistent downward trend.

The association between the SERP2 gene and the 0–6 h effect-site MEC was marginally significant (adjusted p = 0.05245; Supplementary Table S5 ).

Using the Fisher’s Exact test, these proportions were determined as marginally significant ( p = 0.0525).