“marginally significant”

In this study, the association between a BMI ≥24 kg/m 2 and the risk of diabetes was marginally significant (P=0.052).

After additionally adjusting for BMI, systolic BP, diabetes mellitus status, total cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, alcohol intake, antihypertensive therapy, and lipid‐lowering therapy, the overall OSA association remained significant ( P =0.014): mild OSA was significant (OR: 2.08, P =0.006) and moderate/severe OSA was marginally significant (OR: 1.66, P =0.052) for retinal arteriolar narrowing in men.

In contrast, those with poor support but with good chair stand performance presented with a considerably lower odds of a depressive burden compared with the reference group (albeit marginally significant, OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.25–1.01; p = .052).

As shown in Table 3 , Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Table 4 , the ACME of IL-8 was statistically significant for PFS ( p =0.036) and was marginally significant for OS ( p =0.052).

However, analysis of KTR detected a marginally significant difference over time (F[4,48] = 2.864, P = .052, eta 2 [g] = 0.074) but not between the groups or the interaction of group and time.

pNGAL was marginally significant (p = 0.052) and uCyC was not significant (p = 0.76) after they were added to the parsimonious clinical model.

2A ), but this effect appeared weaker than the shift in perception for /aba/ sounds, as suggested by a marginally significant interaction (F(1, 26) = 4,15, p = 0.052) between current stimulus (auditory /aba/, /ada/) and previous stimulus (fused McGurk stimulus, all other stimuli).

We did not observe this pattern in the first session (before participants were taught the game rules) and actually found a marginally significant effect in the opposite direction, with worse memory for winning sequences ( t =–2.01, p=0.052).

As for BMI change, a BMI loss >10% had a marginally significant impact on DFS (HR = 1.87, 95%CI 1.00–3.50, P = 0.052), and it predicted significantly worse OS (HR = 2.15, 95%CI 1.01–4.57, P = 0.047) ( Fig. 2 C and D, Supplementary Table S1 ).

After controlling for other variables in the model, DUB showed a marginally significant association with preoperative HR (β = 0.427, p = 0.052).

The difference between the depression and HV groups was significant in the number of semantic clusters ( p = 0.04) and marginally significant in the number of phonemic clusters ( p = 0.052) during the category fluency task.

There was a marginally significant correlation between macrovascular invasion and severe PHLF (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 0.990–8.276; p = 0.052).

In the post-shortage phase, the decreasing trend appeared to persist, with a marginally significant slope change (coefficient = −13.2, p = 0.052), which may suggest a potential residual effect on submission practices even after the supply issue had been resolved.

no-deviant trials, t(15) = 28.45, p < .001, as well as a marginally significant difference between pupil latency until maximum on hit vs. missed trials t(15) = -2.11, p = .052.

The two means were compared via Student’s t-test, showcasing marginally significant ( p value = 0.052) results supporting a decrease in abundance for this peptide in connection with LN involvement.

Analysis of baseline and post-training emotional-based coping scores revealed a marginally significant group main effect [ANCOVA F (1, 62) = 3.92, P = 0.052], but post-hoc analyses failed to identify any within-group differences ( Figure 4B ).

MMSE deterioration was marginally significant (Wave 1 mean 29.29; Wave 2 mean 29.24; t 1946 = -1.94, p = .052).

For accuracy , this analysis revealed a marginally significant three-way interaction between frequency, interval, and sleep group [ F (1, 36) = 4.031; p = 0.052; η 2 = 0.101; BF incl = 0.128 (moderate support for H 0 )].

Before correcting for multiple testing, the signal is marginally significant in carnivores (p = 0.052) and positive, but not significant, in artiodactyls (p = 0.29).

Specifically, there was a marginally significant decrease in we-words from 3 to 2 weeks before the NSSI event ( M decrease = −0.16, SE = 0.08, t = −1.96, p = 0.052), which stayed at a similar frequency level in the week immediately preceding the event.

When comparing the scores provided by the LIWC, the results of the test indicated that participants came up with marginally significant more negative words in the rumination ( Mdn = 9.31) than in the control condition ( Mdn = 5.26), U = 331.00, z = −1.94, p = .052, while the negativity scores from SentiWordNet were significantly higher in the rumination condition ( Mdn = 0.08) than in the control condition ( Mdn = .05), U = 303.50, z = −2.33, p = .020.

The linear mixed model revealed a marginally significant association between positive affect and gBOLD-CSF coupling over time ( unstandardized estimate = -0.005, p = 0.052), including random effects for participant and positive affect and controlling for age, sex and average positive affect as fixed effects ( Table 2 ).

We did find marginally significant overexpression of ALS gene transcripts in weedy compared with wild individuals ( p = .052), suggesting constitutive overexpression of ALS may provide a survival advantage to weedy individuals in agriculture fields.

The difference in performance between consistent and inconsistent trials was marginally significant when the task was to report the content of their own perspective, t (32) = 2.01, p = .052, d = 0.18.

The SD of head tilt angle showed a marginally significant difference across conditions ( F (1.364, 19.093) = 3.903, p =.052, η p 2 = 0.536).