Next, focusing on PGC1.5 women only, a comparison to UKB showed significant genetic correlations with the overall UKB ( r g = 0.46, P = 0.0004) and UKB women ( r g = 0.46, P = 0.0008), and a slightly lower, but marginally significant correlation with the smaller UKB male data ( r g = 0.44, P = 0.052).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
However, the NOR task revealed marginally significant short-term memory deficits in the T1D STZ group ( p = 0.052), whereas non-T1D rats retained intact short-term memory ( p = 0.049).
Age was significant, β = -0.023, t = -2.18, p = 0.033, 95 % CI [-0.045, −0.002], anxiety symptom scores (BAI) were marginally significant, β = -0.028, t = -1.98, p = 0.052, 95 % CI [-0.056, 0.000], and depression symptom scores (BDI) and months since last injury were significant, β = 0.025, t = 2.04, p = 0.045, 95 % CI [.001, 0.049]; β = 0.002, t = 2.27, p = 0.027, 95 % CI [.000, 0.005], respectively.
The cup-to-disc ratio exhibited a marginally significant difference, with p = 0.052, suggesting a potential difference that approaches statistical significance.
Using branch-site model A with the Glires branch (see Figure S7B for labeling) as foreground lineage in the branch-site test of positive selection (null model ω 2 = 1 fixed) LRT provided marginally significant support ( P = 0.052) for 2 positively selected sites with Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) probability above 0.7 ( Table 2 ).
Of note, in Model 2 (just demographics), participants who identified as people of color had lower odds of suicide risk compared to White participants (aOR 0.357, 95%CI 0.15, 0.84), this association was attenuated and marginally significant ( p = .052) when the mental health variables were added in, and then no longer significant when the social support variables were added. 3.3.3.
The uniANOVA for the ∆HbR values further revealed a marginally significant effect for the interaction of group * surface in ch6(F(1, 18) = 4.322, p = 0.052, η 2 = 0.194).
Moderation by ERP-derived AB The model with N170 to threat moderating the association between DMU vs FTF preference and anxiety symptoms was significant [Model: R 2 = 0.22, f 2 = 0.28, F (6, 68) = 3.28, p = .007], and the DMU*N170 interaction was marginally significant [Δ R 2 = 0.04, b = −0.09, SE = 0.05, F (1, 68) = 3.90, p = .052, LLCI = −0.19, ULCI = 0.001].
A marginally significant difference in stroke mortality was seen in participants taking salt substitute vs. normal salt (χ 2 = 3.78, P = 0.052).
Plant species had significant effects on the OTU richness of fungi inhabiting leaves ( F = 3.026, P = 0.005), roots ( F = 4.550, P < 0.001), and soils ( F = 2.003, P = 0.052, marginally significant) (Table S1).
The racial or ethnic disparity in medication use among those who had previously displayed below-average levels of externalizing problem behaviors was marginally significant (RR = 1.55, p = .052).
Although stable disease was less common in patients with complex THID compared to those with simple THID (1.4% vs 5.4%), the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.052) (Table 2 ).
We found no significant differences between the two groups on any of these measures (all p s > 0.25), except for a marginally significant difference in visual ANS RT ( p = 0.052), which was due to faster RTs in the ANS training group compared to the PA training group.
For the Non-Hispanic White model, number of comorbidities is marginally significant (p=0.052).
Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed a marginally significant reduction of myocardial infarction (16%, P = 0.052) with insulin or sulfonylurea treatment compared with dietary treatment, despite greater weight gain.
This difference was marginally significant ( p value = 0.052).
This analysis indicated that there was a marginally significant effect of condition (β = −.36, SE = .18, z = −1.94, p = .052), where participants were slightly more accurate in the phonological condition compared with the semantic condition.
However, when testing grade as a moderator only in the path relationship between flow and trust, both the hypothetical (sophomoreβ = juniorβ) and the original models showed a marginally significant moderating effect ( p = .052).
The analysis of self-efficacy scores based on demographic variables indicated a marginally significant difference between female and male participants (39.5 ± 11.7 vs. 41.8 ± 12.3, p = 0.052).
A marginally significant cluster was found in neutral trials in 188–216 ms ( T sum = 344.235, p = 0.052).
SCH had a marginally significant effect on OT ( β = 0.08, p = 0.052) ( Table 2 ).
After removing the non-significant interaction term from the regression, a main effect of race was found for the R hippocampus (B = -.17; p = .012), L hippocampus (B = -.20; p = .003), and was marginally significant for the L amygdala (B = -.13; p = .052), wherein Whites had greater volumes than AAs.
Examination of simple effects ( Table 5 ) revealed that for the self-esteem and empathy variables, there was a statistically significant increase in the means from pre-test to post-test in the intervention group ( p < 0.001), and a marginally significant change in the control group ( p = 0.052 and 0.058, respectively).
MMSE deterioration was marginally significant (Wave 1 mean 29.29; Wave 2 mean 29.24; t 1946 = -1.94, p = .052).
The intercept‐only model indicated a significant variance of LDC and AUC both at the within‐person and between‐person levels (variance of between‐person LDC marginally significant, p = 0.052).