“marginally significant”

In addition, alpha power showed a marginally significant negative correlation with PSQI ( r = −0.189, p = 0.051).

For Haemoproteus , the best model showed a marginally significant association with latitude ( p = .051), with a pattern similar to that observed for MHC‐II, with individuals from north Chile having a low prevalence of infection (Table S6 , Figure S3 ).

As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).

Fecundity and maintenance costs A two‐way ANOVA revealed no effect of salinity on fecundity ( F 2,35 = 2.39, P = 0.11), but a marginally significant effect of selection ( F 3,35 = 2.86, P = 0.051) with the lowest fecundity in heat‐selected lines (Fig. 4 ).

In addition, participant in the top tertile of DOS had marginally significant higher level of FBS compared to participants in the bottom tertile (92.3 vs. 88.9 mg/dl, P = 0.051).

Results Two participants who incorrectly responded to the target article comprehension questions were removed from analyses (the significance and direction of results do not differ if these individuals are included, with one exception: the experimental condition x timepoint interaction for the general perceived anti-White discrimination analysis was marginally significant, F (2, 224) = 3.02, p = .051, η p 2 = 0.03).

Hopelessness was marginally significant for females (B = 0.042, SE = 0.021, p = 0.051) and non-significant for males (B = 0.029, SE = 0.021, p = 0.166).

All measures assessing the same ability were significantly positively intercorrelated, except for the linguistic accuracy scores (although the correlation between the verbal fluency and lexical decision task was marginally significant: p = 0.051, r = 0.20), linguistic speed scores (for which the correlation was negative), and the flanker and Simon inhibition scores.

When the anger modality was the body, the interaction between the emotion compound type and group was marginally significant [ F (2,74) = 3.10, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.08].

At the same time, a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051) indicated that the “Balanced” group exhibited the most interest in environmental friendliness.

There was a marginally significant difference in engagement score between program duration groups (F(2)=3.23, p=0.051); the engagement score for clients who have been enrolled in the program for over two years were slightly higher than one year clients. 41% of clients attended Café before participating in any other groups; 4 of them joined other recreational & leisure groups. 3 clients later enrolled in a skill based group. 92% of respondents commented about the benefit of Café to their recovery as being “good” or “better”.

The direct effect of C1 became marginally significant when controlling for the mediator (path c’: B = -0.28, SE = 0.14, p = 0.051).

In addition, there was a main effect for mode-of-thought [ F (1,96)=6.24, p <0.05], as well as a marginally significant order × mode-of-thought interaction [ F (5,92)=2.31, p=0 .051].

The results showed significant Neurotracker learning effects in all intervention groups and a marginally significant learning effect in the control group ( p = .051, d = 0.45).

Results : The analysis of smooth pursuit gain in the participants revealed a marginally significant reduction between the SMA patients and the healthy controls in the horizontal direction at a frequency of 0.2 Hz ( p = 0.051), but no significant differences were observed at any other frequency or direction.

The results indicate a positive, though marginally significant, coefficient for roommate commensality ( β = 0.043, p = 0.051), while the second-category commensality is not significant.

Households with two or more siblings and pets displayed marginally significant increased abundances of Penicillium (W = 38, p = 0.051, r = −0.008, CI 95% −0.014 to 0.0007) and Aureobasidium (W = 42, p = 0.087, r = −0.006, CI 95% −0.028 to 0.001), while those with no siblings and no pets exhibited lower overall fungal diversity.

The 5-year survival rate from the diagnosis of colorectal cancer tended to be lower in patients with an aerogenous pattern than in those who had a non-aerogenous pattern; however, the difference was marginally significant (p=.051).

Two-way ANOVA of γ showed a marginally significant TnT–SL interaction effect on γ (P = 0.051), suggesting that TnT F88L altered γ differently at short and long SLs.

The same ANOVA performed on the Effector Priming Task revealed a marginally significant effect of Age Group F (1,83) = 3.9, P = 0.051) but the main effect of Prime Group and the Prime x Age Group interaction was not significant (both F (1,83) < 1).

In contrast to 30 mg QD dacomitinib and 80 mg QD osimertinib, we observed a marginally significant improvement after 1 year of treatment ( P = 0.051) after multiple comparison corrections.

The increase was marginally significant ( P < .051). 3.2.

Although the main effect of condition was marginally significant ( F 4,99 = 2.45, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.09 ), a post hoc Bonferroni corrected t -test did not reveal any significant difference between each condition (all p s > 0.05).

For work engagement, we observed no significant change in the intervention group, but there was a marginally significant ( d = -.26, p = .051) decrease in the control group over the study period.

40‐64) revealed a marginally significant negative association ( B = ‐0.320, p = 0.051), suggesting that participants aged 40‐64 were slightly less likely to anticipate AD.