“marginally significant”

A marginally significant effect of temperature was apparent when data from the two t 5 CO 2 treatments were pooled and subject to PLS-DA (p = 0.051; Supplementary Figure S2 ).

However, the formative evaluation showed marginally significant association with local applicants ( p = 0.051) (c) Arab Board Written Exam ( Tables 4 and 5 ) A negative correlation was shown between being a local applicant at the time of application and passing the Arab Board part 1 (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03–0.89; p = 0.037) and part 2 (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01–0.80; p = 0.037) written exams.

If we analyzed only participants who learned about a mostly competent vehicle, the Consistency × Impression Type interaction was marginally significant in the predicted direction, b = .27, SE = .14, t (350) = 1.96, p = .051.

Early graduates rated commitment to the profession higher than recent graduates did, while commitment to the organisation was marginally significant for the year of graduation ( p = 0.051).

Additionally, the flanker congruency effect for accuracy demonstrated a marginally significant positive correlation with NRT, r = .19, p = .051, suggesting that individuals with greater susceptibility to interference may be more prone to NRT.

2.0%), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

In the TaqMan subgroup, a marginally significant effect between them was also detected under the additive genetic model (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85,1.00, P = .051) (Table 4 ).

In the multivariate analysis about management satisfaction (Additional file 5 ), patients over 48 years had marginally significant higher odds of satisfaction with management (OR = 31.98, 95%CI [1.79–571.74], p = 0.051) than patients under 35.

Women's age group and number of living children were marginally significant (p=0.051 and p=0.061 respectively).

Post hoc Tukey tests revealed significant (or marginally significant) differences between no reward and $5 reward ( p = 0.051), between no reward and $10 ( p = 0.020), and between $5 and $10 ( p = 0.008).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant interaction of hemisphere × MA [ F (2, 100) = 3.07, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.06].

In addition, storms also had a negative and marginally significant effect in the small islet of Binicodrell Petit (t = -2.541, P = 0.051).

The interaction between defeat/entrapment and FTT-Pos predicted 3-month SIQ at a marginally significant level after controlling for depressive symptoms ( β = 0.17, p = 0.051).

When we repeated the ANOVA only on epochs 2 and 3, where a benefit of context repetition would be expected, the main effect of configuration became marginally significant (F(1,12) = 4.721, p = 0.051).

Two way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of age ( F (1,8) = 8.322, p = 0.02) and a marginally significant age by treatment interaction ( F (1,8) = 5.283, p = 0.051).

First, the main effect of language on the solidarity variable became marginally significant, B = –.13, p = .051.

The difference between these two time delays was marginally significant (t 15 = 2.12, p = 0.051).

The No ACL group had marginally significant lower VAS than the ACL first patients ( P = 0.051) [ Table 3 ].

A marginally significant difference in pain severity was observed among dysmenorrhea, NMPP, and dyspareunia (mean VAS scores 5.3, 4.7, and 5.4, respectively; p = 0.051), with NMPP being comparatively less severe ( Fig. 1 ).

The effect of permissive parenting style was marginally significant ( β = 0.12, t = 1.96, p = 0.051).

Only the MFA values of the lIFOF in the second time point had a marginally significant difference (F>M), t (36) = 2.02, P = 0.051. l IFOF Here, a significant main effect of time was revealed, F (1, 35) = 49.94, P < 0.01 with a large effect size η 2 = 0.588.

At follow-up, such correlation remained significant for HAPA-enhanced ( r =.59, P <.001) and basic mindfulness groups ( r =.43, P <.001) and became marginally significant for waitlist controls ( r =.28, P =.051).

However, for NP2-biased verbs, the difference between congruent and incongruent conditions was not significant for the high-proficiency group ( β = −0.014, SE = 0.037, t = −0.371, p = 0.711) but was marginally significant for the low-proficiency group ( β = −0.076, SE = 0.039, t = −1.951, p = 0.051).

This association remains marginally significant when adjusting for age, energy intake, BMI, job status, thyroid, and smoking status (OR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.00, 1.16; P = 0.051).

Furthermore, a marginally significant association was also identified between the presence of the chrA gene and MAR index values exceeding 0.2 ( p = 0.051) in our study.