“marginally significant”

There were no significant associations in the final adjusted model, though income was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

To investigate this further, analysis of the continuous measurements (Figure 2 ) demonstrated evidence of a positive correlation of GDF9 with ovarian volume ( p = 0.02; Figure 2A ) and with AFC ( p = 0.004; Figure 2B ), as well as marginally significant evidence of a positive correlation with AMH ( p = 0.05; Figure 2C ).

eCPMV Immunotherapy Induces Changes in Cytokine Plasma Levels Of the 13 cytokines analyzed, a significant decrease in interleukin (IL)-6, IL-7, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels were observed after the first eCPMV injection ( p < 0.04 for all), followed by an increase close to basal plasma levels by surgery day; a nonsignificant decline in IL-2 plasma levels was observed, and a marginally significant decrease in IL-10 by DSx ( p = 0.050) ( Table S9 ) was also observed.

Hypothesis testing As predicted, ANOVA analysis (scarcity appeal × need for uniqueness) with purchase intention as the dependent variable indicated that the interaction between the two independent variables was marginally significant ( F (1, 122) = 8.32, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.064).

However, a marginally significant inverse association was found between study duration and changes in insulin concentrations (P = 0.05).

For the E/I ratio, the interaction term became marginally significant ( F (1, 12) = 4.68, p = 0.05, Figure 3(c) ).

Results from the meta-analysis were significant for any migraine (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99) and marginally significant for MA (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00; p = 0.05).

Additionally, a marginally significant association was found between the CNV and body diagonal length in HS ( p -value = 0.050).

In the Mendelian randomisation model adjusted for age, gender and principal components (PCs) (Model 3, Table 2 ), each 10 mm Hg increase in DBP and MAP was associated with a 4.5 μm decrease (P = 0.01) in CRAE, and the effect size of MAP on CRAE remained similar (β = −2.6 μm) and was marginally significant (P = 0.05).

Notably, the causal effects of FEV1 on SA of pericalcarine gyrus turns to marginally significant in results without global weighted (βnon-gc = -13.315, 95%CI: -26.654 ~ 0.024, P = 0.050).

Sensitivity Analysis Using Self-Reported Glaucoma Definition When glaucoma was defined solely by self-reported physician diagnosis (167 cases, 2785 controls), a marginally significant association with higher serum Klotho levels was observed (OR = 1.05 per 100 pg/mL increase; 95% CI, 1.00–1.10; P = 0.05 in both models).

However, the interaction between task type and expectation level was marginally significant, F (2, 68) = 1.82, p = 0.05.

The present meta-analysis indicated a marginally significant difference between the two groups, with better outcomes with ACE inhibitors (fixed-effects model analysis: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00; P=0.05; I 2 =44%; Fig. 4 ).

For the Story task, results showed a marginally significant effect of Setting on prosocial choices, F (1,30) = 4.16, p = .05, n p 2 = 0.122 ( Fig. 4 b): choices were more prosocial under the ON setting ( M = 0.576, SD = 0.174) than under the OFF setting ( M = 0.526, SD = 0.215).

A marginally significant difference was also noted in the mothers’ nationality, with the majority of foreign mothers being in the low PB group (83.3%, Fisher's Exact Test, P = .05).

None of the 152 canonical pathways were statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or even marginally significant (unadjusted p < 0.05).

In Table S5 , we also reported the proteins in each complex that are marginally significant (p < 0.05) based on the univariate association test using mixed effects regression models.

There was a main effect of meter [ F (1,49) = 39.90, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.449], a marginally significant main effect of group [ F (4,49) = 2.56, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.173] and a meter by group interaction [ F (4,49) = 4.59, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.272].

IRI and HOMA‐IR decreased from baseline to Week 48, although these decreases were marginally significant ( P = 0.05 and 0.07, respectively).

The effect of Condition in both age-groups concerning the duration of navigation was marginally significant ( p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.06) but a post hoc pairwise Tukey test indicated no significant differences.

The difference in the magnitude of variance between the first and second digitization of the 2D photographs is significant only for VAR2 (.05 > p > .01) and marginally significant (.1 > p > .05) for VAR1, with absolute deviations from the means of the two replicates accounting for less than 1% of variation (Table 5 ).

Among CN controls, the coefficient for age (per decade) was marginally significant for Aβ 42 (−36.67 pg/ml, −3.0%, p < 0.05), and highly significant for tTau (+23.37 pg/ml, +13.3%, p < 0.001) and pTau (+2.06 pg/ml, +13.3%, p < 0.001).

Exercising 1–2 times per week was also marginally significant ( p = 0.05); therefore, exercise might reduce Pb accumulation in infertile women (aOR = 0.37, 95 % CI 0.14–1.00).

However, the difference in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke between patients with an LPS and those without shunting was marginally significant (aHR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.00-5.86; p = 0.05).

Primary outcome At Week 7, LM/S did not demonstrate significant improvement compared to CAU in depressive symptoms (adjusted mean difference = − 1.21, p =.80, d = 0.24), while the PLM showed a marginally significant reduction relative to CAU (adjusted mean difference = − 3.96, p =.05, d = 0.78).