“marginally significant”

Employment in Model 1 changed from marginally significant to significant at p < 0.05 ( p = 0.049).

[ 85 ] reported a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.05) in cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in cats with cystic endometrial hyperplasia, while Jursza et al.

This trend is considered marginally significant (MW-test: p < 0.05, KS-test: p < 0.15).

Changes in Depressive Symptoms The ANOVA testing for changes in depressive symptoms demonstrated a marginally significant main effect of time-by-group interaction (F(1, 79) = 3.82, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.05), indicating a marginally significant difference between the groups post-intervention.

Also, the intervention was associated with a negative change in EQ5D compared with the baseline assessment; the association was marginally significant (β = −0.05; p = .050).

A higher occurrence of MSEs was observed in the comparator group, which was marginally significant (p=0·05).

Only the IV PCA–opioid use was found to be a marginally significant preventive factor for early postoperative severe pain in the PACU ( p =0.05; OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.24–1.00).

There was a marginally significant difference for stride length, shorter in PD (F = 3.97, df = 1,68, p = 0.05).

In a study conducted by Head, marginally significant ( p = 0.05) increases in overall consumption were observed using weighed plate waste in four North Carolina elementary schools exposed to nutrition education with a focus on basic nutrition and dietary patterns [ 107 ].

A paediatric investigation found only a marginally significant (P = 0.050) difference in sodium thiosulfate's protective effect on cisplatin-related ototoxicity for patients with Hispanic ethnicity. 15 There have been, however, a number of pharmacogenomic studies of cisplatin-related hearing loss (reviewed by Hong et al., 17 ) so it is likely that genetic variants more prevalent in certain populations could account in part for our findings.

The moderating effects of marital status and number of siblings on the dominance component were marginally significant ( p < .05 but p > .01).

The ANOVA results showed (see Table 4 ) that the main effect of exercise level was significant, F (1, 99) = 30.16, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.23; the main effect of gender was marginally significant, F (1, 99) = 3.34, p > 0.05, η 2 = 0.03; the interaction between exercise level and gender was not significant, F (1, 99) = 0.12, p > 0.05, η 2 = 0.02.

Finally, on the subject of access to mental healthcare, with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.05), mental health caregivers (82.5 %) considered this to be a priority need more often than primary caregivers did (64.8 %).

The marginally significant correlation between VSPF modulation range and IQ (Spearman’s Rho = 0.49; p = 0.05) suggests that the reduced VSPF modulation range in children with ASD is related to developmental delay (Fig. 5a ).

However, this association was marginally significant (P = 0.05).

Using the global measures of gray matter CBF, the regression of CBF on age, ignoring eCRF, was marginally significant [ b = −0.35, t (39) = −2.00, p = 0.05].

The egg mass size × species interaction effect was found to be marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.84; df = 1; p = 0.050).

This difference was found to be marginally significant when examining the EHQ subscale of feelings about healthy eating, χ 2 (4) = 9.48, p = 0.050, Cramer’s V = 0.27.

There was a marginally significant effect of age on collective identification F (1,45) = 3.93, p = .05, η p 2 = .08], but a significant interaction between group membership and age [ F (1,45) = 4.54, p = .04, η p 2 = .09].

A marginally significant 3-way interaction ( F (1,50) = 4.0, p = 0.05) reflected presence of a Category Size × Age interaction for concrete ( F (1,50) = 8.66, p = 0.005) but not abstract items ( F (1,50) = 0.11, p = 0.74).

This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.77, df = 1, P = 0.05).

This difference was marginally significant (p=0.05) ( Fig.2D ).

A linear regression analysis shows that there is a marginally significant decline in yearly incidence of 58 acute infections per 1000 children per year from 1998 to 2002 (p = 0.05).

The evaluation of the product was positively correlated with the health orientation, r (661) = 0.29, p < 0.001, the ecology orientation, r (661) = 0.17, p < 0.001, and the self-perceived knowledge of healthy eating; however, this relation was marginally significant, r (632) = 0.08, p = 0.05.

Significant clustering is defined as critical ( p < 0.01), marginally significant (0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.05), or not significant ( p > 0.05).