“marginally significant”

Considering candidate genes from two previous GWAS of BDR, three SNPs (rs10476900 (near ADRB2 ) [ p -value = 0.009], rs10827492 ( CREM ) [ p -value = 0.02], and rs72646209 ( NCOA3 ) [ p -value = 0.02]) had a marginally significant interaction with age on BDR ( p < 0.05).

The first MANCOVA yielded a marginally significant overall effect of group ( F Wilks (2,110) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.05).

cleared HCV were marginally significant ( P = 0.05), whereas differences between women with chronic HCV vs.

Effects of omega-3 supplementation on blood clotting function and cell blood count (CBC) The lymphocyte count increased in the omega-3 group compared to the control group, though this effect was marginally significant (11.59 vs 11.80, F = 4.08, P = 0.05).

For this study, statistical significance was indicated by p ‐values <0.05, and marginally significant results have p ‐values >0.05 but <0.10.

Again, no other predictor reached conventional levels of significance although warmth was a marginally significant negative predictor, B = −0.62, SE = 0.32, Exp(B) = 0.54, p = 0.05.

3 ). For the Low Autistic Traits group there was also a marginally significant Condition × SOA interaction, F (1, 33) = 4.13, p = . 050, ηρ 2 = .11, whilst the High Autistic Traits group did not show the same interaction, F (1, 31) = 1.35, p = . 255, ηρ 2 = . 04.

marginally significant) than the non-PE days ( F 1,506 = 3.76, p = 0.05).

Oyster survival We found marginally significant differences (χ 2 = 7.66, df = 3, p = 0.05) in oyster survival among the sites from May 2018 – May 2019.

Additionally, a marginally significant association was observed after adjusting for the stenosis degree and time interval between HR-MRI and stroke (β=0.190, 95% CI [−0.002, 0.337], P =0.05) ( Table 2 ).

Treatment effects were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.10 ≤ P ≥ 0.05.

Regarding the self-report measures, we observed a marginally significant interaction Condition x Group, F(2) = 3.053, p = .05, partial ƞ 2 = .041, suggesting that, in both groups, the self-reported arousal was always higher in the fear condition compared with the neutral condition, as well as in the happy condition compared with the neutral condition, p < .01.

Reducing Visual Information Increased Pointing Error For both younger and older adults, pointing error increased as we removed visual information, going from full, to partial, to blindfolded conditions ( Figure 8 B), although this increase was marginally significant (i.e., there was a weak effect of visual information when considering both the fake and real hand conditions together, p = 0.05).

In the second 24 hour period following infection, where infection status had a strong absolute effect on fecundity, this correlation becomes marginally significant ( r = −0.324, p = 0.050).

However, a marginally significant correlation was obtained between age and change in treatment quality ( p = 0.050).

In addition, high cardiorespiratory fitness showed marginally significant ( P < 0.05) relationship with the mental component of HRQoL (see Table 3 and Figure 2 ).

Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant but weak positive correlation with age ( r = 0.20, p = 0.03), and a marginally significant correlation with work experience ( r = 0.13, p = 0.05), with the emotional labour score.

Although the variance in education level was marginally significant (PD: 13.0 ± 3.1 years, HC: 14.4 ± 2.0 years, p > 0.05), it was not considered a substantial difference.

A marginally significant 3-way interaction ( F (1,50) = 4.0, p = 0.05) reflected presence of a Category Size × Age interaction for concrete ( F (1,50) = 8.66, p = 0.005) but not abstract items ( F (1,50) = 0.11, p = 0.74).

There were no statistically significant differences at any of the time points, except at time 0, which had a marginally significant difference (p = 0.05).

Long-term interventions [ 22 , 23 , 33 ] (D > 12 weeks; 3 studies) exhibited marginally significant effects (SMD = − 0.81, 95% CI − 1.62 – 0.00; p = 0.05) with considerable heterogeneity (I2= 90%).

A similar but marginally significant effect emerged for participants who reported access to information as easy (OR = 0.23, CI [0.05, 1.00], p = .050).

A trend towards higher eczema presentation was reported in Group B infants, but the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

SVO 2 %: Pooled analysis of four studies revealed that ketone supplementation led to a marginally significant increase in SVO 2 % compared to placebo (MD = 3.33, 95%CI: -0.01 to 6.68; P = 0.05; Figure 2D ).

On the emotions scores, lesions on the upper limbs caused marginally significant lower scores compared to lesions in the face/head (p = 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found as far as lesions on the lower limbs or trunk compared to face/head located lesions.