“marginally significant”

A marginally significant protective effect was observed in the 60–69 age group (unadjusted OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.39–1.00, p = 0.050).

Among the variants used in the gene-based test, four, including I349F, were marginally significant ( P <0.05) ( Supplementary Table 5 ).

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analyses further revealed a marginally significant separation in nematode community composition (based on abundances) between the ambient and warmed treatments ( F 1,39 = 1.69, P = 0.05; Fig. 2B ).

The SEM with temporal variables showed marginally significant ( p = 0.05) positive dust coefficients for 6- to 23-month-old children in 1994–1998, suggesting higher dust IRs during those years.

There were marginally significant differences ( p < 0.05) between CHIKV copy numbers in mosquitoes fed first with ZIKV and then with CHIKV compared to mosquitoes exposed to an uninfectious blood meal first (UC vs.

For the single-question variable trust scientific information from this author , both the effect of arm and the interaction effect of arm × political orientation were marginally significant (.01< P <.05), with political liberals being more likely to trust scientific information from authors who provided both cognitive and normative claims, and political conservatives more likely to trust scientific information from authors who provided only cognitive claims.

Response efficacy had a significant positive impact ( β = 0.470, p <0.001); perceived threat also exerted a significant positive effect ( β = 0.289, p <0.001); response cost showed a significant negative influence ( β = −0.156, p <0.001); and self-efficacy exhibited a marginally significant positive association ( β = 0.092, p <0.05).

However, the main effect of gender on psychological resilience was marginally significant ( p < 0.05), which does not support a mediation effect model with gender as the primary moderating factor.

A follow-up ANOVA excluding the 0 cm condition showed a marginally significant effect of group [ F (1, 15) = 4.54, p = 0.05], but again no group × increment interaction.

The association between IncFIA and enrofloxacin was marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

One-way ANOVAs for each session revealed significant differences between the vehicle and L-KYN groups on day 1 [ F (1, 13) = 9.2, p < 0.01], day 2 [ F (1, 13) = 5.5, p < 0.03], and day 6 [ F (1, 13) = 5.6, p < 0.03], a marginally significant difference on day 3 [ F (1, 13) = 4.5, p = 0.05], and no significant differences between the groups on day 4 ( p > 0.1), day 5 ( p > 0.1), or day 7 ( p > 0.4).

observed only a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.05) with the same comparison.

When restricting attack rates only to fruits that were held in the beak (indicating potential dispersal), we found the interaction between fruit size and elevation to again be the most important interaction (GLM holding rates ; Figure 6 ; Table A4 ), although in this case, it was marginally significant overall ( p = .05).

The number of brood had a marginally significant effect (GLMM: brood F 1,177 = 5.237; P ≤ 0.05), while population and colony phase (i.e., the presence or absence of adult offspring) had no significant effect (population F 1,175 = 0.093; P = 0.761; colony phase F 1,176 = 0.157; P = 0.692).

The comparison of the mean percentage of Np pods under greenhouse UV light exposure and field conditions revealed a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.05).

The effect of threshold on the SME was marginally significant ( F(2,48) = 3.19, p = 0.05; η 2 p = 0.12; η 2 G = 0.01 ).

This finding was validated by western blot at protein level (Figures 4 C,D) finding marginally significant differences when comparing risk and protective genotypes at basal levels ( p = 0.05), but not after stimulation.

The observed inequality in HIV transmission was also marginally significant at p = 0.05.

Additionally, T2change in TMTBA exhibited a significant correlation with T2change in alpha1 ( r = 0.363, p = 0.023), and T6change in rumination showed a marginally significant correlation with T6change in alpha1 ( r = 0.330, p = 0.050).

There was a marginally significant reduction (χ 2 = 3.73, P-value = 0.05, OR = 2.57, 95% CI 0.97, 6.79) in the proportion of malnourished children that were malaria-positive at pre-intervention screening (20, 60.6%), compared to those that were malaria-positive at 1st post-intervention screening (7, 31.8%) after wearing pCAM.

The predicted relative abundance of bacteria with phenotypes, such as mobile genetic elements (MGE), biofilm-formation, and stress-tolerant potential, also tended to be higher in laryngeal microbiota, while the differences were marginally significant ( P = 0.05, F = 36.5).

Post hoc Dunn’s tests revealed a marginally significant difference only between PI1 and NR1 (Dunn’s test: adjusted p value = 0.050), with no other significant pairwise comparisons (Dunn’s test: adjusted p value ≥ 0.32; Supplementary Fig. 4 ; Supplementary Data 3 ).

The main effect of object size was marginally significant (F(1,24) = 4.16, p>.05, η p 2 = .15).

Compared with the reputation group and the regardless-of-reputation group, according to the linear regression results, the interaction term between reputation constraint and agent type has a marginally significant impact on sharing behaviors ( F = 3.981, p = 0.050), indicating that when the participants are of different types, the impact of reputation constraints on sharing behaviors is significantly different.

This was confirmed by Kruskal–Wallis H tests, revealing marginally significant group differences for RHR (χ2 = 5.98, p = 0.050, η 2 = 0.19 [−0.01, 0.08]).