“marginally significant”

The main effect of Group was marginally significant ( F (1, 32) = 4.14, p = 0.050) reflecting slower naming times in the DLD ( M = 1404 ms, SD = 422 ms) than in the TD group ( M = 1177 ms, SD = 370 ms).

Regarding the self-report measures, we observed a marginally significant interaction Condition x Group, F(2) = 3.053, p = .05, partial ƞ 2 = .041, suggesting that, in both groups, the self-reported arousal was always higher in the fear condition compared with the neutral condition, as well as in the happy condition compared with the neutral condition, p < .01.

The models that allowed ω > 1 exhibited a significant fit for the data for chimpanzee TAAR6 ( P < 0.0001) and a marginally significant fit for human TAAR2 ( P < 0.05) (Table S5).

Compared with the reputation group and the regardless-of-reputation group, according to the linear regression results, the interaction term between reputation constraint and agent type has a marginally significant impact on sharing behaviors ( F = 3.981, p = 0.050), indicating that when the participants are of different types, the impact of reputation constraints on sharing behaviors is significantly different.

Between-subjects analysis (n = 16) showed a marginally significant reduction in DOMS scores at 48 hours ( P = 0.05 in right legs and P = 0.053 in left legs).

Using significant meQTLs on chromosome 1, analyses using only African American samples ( N = 112) showed that 99.91% of the meQTLs were directionally consistent with the full analysis, with 92% marginally significant ( P < 0.05) and 66% genome-wide significant (FDR < 0.01) in the smaller sample size and an overall sharing of π 1 = 0.995.

The clinically equivalent medium-dose BCG treatment demonstrated a marginally significant anti-tumor and survival benefit ( P = 0.05, Mantel-Cox test) over saline.

For old saplings, the extent to which warming accelerated shoot growth also varied by branch position, with vertical leaders exhibiting a greater response than lateral shoots (Figure 6 ); these differences were marginally significant at p = 0.05 for T+, and p = 0.07 for T++ treatments.

Living with a partner had a marginally significant effect (χ 2 = 3.844; p = 0.050), with a negative association (B = −1.585; 95% CI = −3.169 to −0.001), suggesting that those who do not live with a partner tend to verbalize a greater number of complaints.

Time trends for isoniazid prevalence (increase) and MDR TB (decrease) among new cases were marginally significant ( F = 3.33, p<0.05, and F = 1.13, p<0.05) but in opposite directions.

The interaction of both factors was marginally significant, [ F (1.6, 71.96) = 3.37, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.07], revealing a larger difference in miss and misidentification rates during forest trials compared to interior and library/books trials.

Regarding DED symptoms, a marginally significant trend in DEQ-5 scores was observed, in which patients with elevated TC (>200 mg/dl) and LDL levels (>130 mg/dl) reported more severe DED symptoms ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 1(c) ).

The interaction between sex and age was marginally significant ( p = .050) and the three-way interaction between sex, age, and hand was significant ( p = .036).

Four (TH, Ca 2+ , Fe 2+ , and NH 4 + ) showed a marginally significant increase (P = 0.05–0.07), whereas the other variables did not show a significant pattern, albeit most of the non-significant increases (e.g.

Although dedication showed a marginally significant uncorrected p value ( p = 0.05), this was not significant after FDR correction ( p = 0.23).

While estimates calculated using this correction factor did not appreciably differ from uncorrected estimates, the HR for obese class 1 went from being marginally significant at the p < 0.05 threshold to being no longer significant at that threshold.

Results and Discussion The MTT results indicate that treatment with lithium increases neuronal viability in comparison with the control cells, with a marginally significant difference ( p < 0.05).

Treatment effects were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.10 ≤ P ≥ 0.05.

There was also a marginally significant effect for the interaction between Hemisphere and Condition (F(4,112) = 2, 458, p = .05).

There was a marginally significant difference in weight gain ( p = 0.05) between the CF‐35g (control) group and the MCL‐35g group (Weanimix with Moringa ), after controlling for baseline values and wealth index (Table 4 ).

Model 5 in Table 2 shows the marginally significant interaction between search persistence and prosocial motivation (β = −0.20, t = −1.99, p < 0.05), thus supporting Hypothesis 4 .

Individual repeatability for inspection time was marginally significant ( R = 0.14, p = 0.05, CI = 0.0, 0.84) while controlling for flush and presentation order, but this effect was not significant when two visually obvious outliers were removed ( R = 0.11, p = 0.11, CI = 0.0, 0.74), and when not controlling for significant fixed factors (non-adjusted repeatability: R = 0.07, p = 0.39, CI = 0.0, 0.74). 3.3.

We found that AC016876.1 showed marginally significant lower expression in Basal-like than Her2 patients with uninvolved lymph node (stage ;N0; P=0.05; Wilcoxon test; Figure S1H ).

Individuals with unplanned pregnancies have higher EPDS scores compared to those with planned pregnancies, although the difference is marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Day 1 A marginally significant difference was seen in GWI (1587.2 vs 1165.6 mmHg %; p = 0.05, BF 10 = 1.53) and GCW (1805.4 vs 1349.1 mmHg %; p = 0.05, BF 10 = 1.69) between survivors and non-survivors.